As you may have noticed, the forum was offline for a period. We identified a security incident to Sportsbook Review Forum and took the site offline as a containment step while we investigated.
We wanted to make sure the system and site were restored and secured before bringing things back online and you will see that we are requiring all forum users to reset their password as a precautionary step.
If you have any questions, our moderators are around and happy to help where they can.
It's rather amusing, even if some of the positions are ridiculous.
9
Yes
0%
8
No, he's just a player
0%
1
No, he's a Sportsbook.com shill trying to justify old Jazette CP thefts
0%
0
skrtelfan
SBR MVP
10-09-08
1913
#2
Beyond a reasonable doubt, no, by preponderance of the evidence, yes. What standard is used in SBR kangaroo court?
Comment
Justin7
SBR Hall of Famer
07-31-06
8577
#3
Originally posted by skrtelfan
Beyond a reasonable doubt, no, by preponderance of the evidence, yes. What standard is used in SBR kangaroo court?
This isn't a criminal case. Just an informal pole. No jury instructions will be provided on your question re: the appropriate evidentiary standard.
Comment
trixtrix
Restricted User
04-13-06
1897
#4
well i think the jazz shill angle is a bit of stretch, this means he has enough foreplanning to know where arguing wagerweb's theft will eventually lead.. and so far my man has demonstrated the exact opposite
Comment
trixtrix
Restricted User
04-13-06
1897
#5
gee, i wonder who voted the 1 time for eagle NOT being a shill lol