SBR, if it is true that you blocked a bailout because you wanted a cut of the action

**RogueScholar** · 01-09-13, 02:36 PM

Originally posted by raiders72001

Great example of why people should believe little of what's posted by me.

FYP.

**tto827** · 01-09-13, 02:49 PM

Originally posted by Dark Horse

The banning of wtt0315, under the circumstances, is all the proof I need. This guy had just helped seven players to get a bailout.

Anyway, it's becoming increasingly unlikely that there will be a bailout through SBR participation, because they place their own interest first. Even in this incredibly ugly situation.

It's known not to share contact info on this site, I'm going to guess he had to do that to get them a bailout. I agree he shouldn't have been banned, but he broke a rule.

**pokernut9999** · 01-09-13, 04:26 PM

Maybe WTT0315 felt obligated since he was the biggest shill on the forum. Funny how he had all the inside info after the fact but none before the collaspe.

Not everyone is who you think they are.

**HedgeHog** · 01-09-13, 04:38 PM

Originally posted by pokernut9999

Maybe WTT0315 felt obligated since he was the biggest shill on the forum. Funny how he had all the inside info after the fact but none before the collaspe.

Not everyone is who you think they are.

Point taken, because the SBR today bares no resemblance to the watchdog site they created well over a decade ago.

**uncynd** · 01-09-13, 07:04 PM

If you've wasted anytime in this thread you are just as stupid as OP. If I operated a sportsbook I would hope for nothing but players like the ones in this thread.

**eastern2** · 01-09-13, 07:09 PM

Originally posted by uncynd

If you've wasted anytime in this thread you are just as stupid as OP. If I operated a sportsbook I would hope for nothing but players like the ones in this thread.

Guess what you participated! So obv u have no life if u took the time to reply

**Squared Box** · 01-09-13, 07:32 PM

Originally posted by tto827

It's known not to share contact info on this site, I'm going to guess he had to do that to get them a bailout. I agree he shouldn't have been banned, but he broke a rule.

My goodness, he broke a rule? Golly gee, that ain't right.

It's a good thing he was banned. Rules are rules, eh?

**Dark Horse** · 01-09-13, 07:39 PM

He broke a pm rule. Can't have that. Stealing 1.5 million is one thing, but breaking a pm rule... nah.

**bettilimbroke999** · 01-09-13, 07:56 PM

2/3 of the 1.5 mil is owed to 10 guys that already have accounts...what braindead fukin book would give 10 of their sharpest gamblers an extra million just bc some idiot scambook robbed them? Don't be stupid

**Bill Dozer** · 01-09-13, 08:14 PM

No, someone is not going to keep responding to story telling. Everytime a SBR-wannabe site posts some nonsense, they get the attention they want here. We aren't going to facilitate another site's viral marketing campaign.

Dark Horse, IMO time to man up take responsibility for the fact that you didn't play at the safest sportsbook available to you. A lot of players made a lot of money with BI. Even those with the biggest balances were well into the plus column. When SBR told posters they weren't rated higher because they were new, many of the same posters who are the loudest now, advocated that they were better than our opinion.

There is only a small few making most of these posts. Most of the victims understand that they are adults who make their own decisions. They understand that a display ad does not make SBRforum their personal insurance company. They understand that all the folks who work on this site feel very badly for them.

Anyone is welcomed to post whatever they like about any bailout offer. When books have failed in the past, SBR printed the offer from other books so players knew what was on the table. Here, the only thing anyone has seen were bonus offers that wouldn't be good value for players if it was offered to the general public.

SBR is not involved beyond observing and letting a potential participant know that those they help will have all the room they want here to sing their praises. Without question any book that assisted (beyond a crappy bonus offer) would probably win a good spot in the next poster poll and see their global exposure rise after flexing some financial muscle (once payouts were received). Even the source of the lies and drama, former owner of stiff book Apex (americas....com, was told he was welcome to step up and if he paid winners would see support. He used player deposits to build Americasbookie up, maybe he can repay the favor and show he belongs well above the blacklist.

**Footballtime** · 01-09-13, 08:20 PM

Originally posted by Bill Dozer

No, someone is not going to keep responding to story telling. Everytime a SBR-wannabe site posts some nonsense, they get the attention they want here. We aren't going to facilitate another site's viral marketing campaign.

Dark Horse, IMO time to man up take responsibility for the fact that you didn't play at the safest sportsbook available to you.

There is only a small few making most of these posts. Most of the victims understand that they are adults who make their own decisions. They understand that a display ad does not make SBRforum their personal insurance company. They understand that all the folks who work on this site feel very badly for them.

Anyone is welcomed to post whatever they like about any bailout offer. When books have failed in the past, SBR reposted the offer from other books so players knew what was on the table. The only thing anyone has seen were bonus offers that wouldn't be good value for players if it was offered to the general public.

SBR is not involved beyond observing and letting a potential participant know that those they help will have all the room they want here to sing their praises. Without question any book that assisted (beyond a crappy bonus offer) would probably win a good spot in the next poster poll and see their global exposure rise after they flexing some financial muscle (once payouts were received). Even the source of a lot of the rumors, former owner of stiff book Apex (americas....com, was told he was welcome to step up and if he paid winners would see support. He used player deposits to build americasbookie up, maybe he can repay the favor and show he belongs well above the blacklist

Ill man up and say it wasnt my best option, Now Can you man up and say you lead me and posters to the slaughter house and knew it was coming well before you told us? Man up Billy Boy!

**JasonDC** · 01-09-13, 08:20 PM

Originally posted by Bill Dozer

No, someone is not going to keep responding to story telling. Everytime a SBR-wannabe site posts some nonsense, they get the attention they want here. We aren't going to facilitate another site's viral marketing campaign.

Dark Horse, IMO time to man up take responsibility for the fact that you didn't play at the safest sportsbook available to you.

There is only a small few making most of these posts. Most of the victims understand that they are adults who make their own decisions. They understand that a display ad does not make SBRforum their personal insurance company. They understand that all the folks who work on this site feel very badly for them.

Anyone is welcomed to post whatever they like about any bailout offer. When books have failed in the past, SBR reposted the offer from other books so players knew what was on the table. The only thing anyone has seen were bonus offers that wouldn't be good value for players if it was offered to the general public.

SBR is not involved beyond observing and letting a potential participant know that those they help will have all the room they want here to sing their praises. Without question any book that assisted (beyond a crappy bonus offer) would probably win a good spot in the next poster poll and see their global exposure rise after they flexing some financial muscle (once payouts were received). Even the source of a lot of the rumors, former owner of stiff book Apex (americas....com, was told he was welcome to step up and if he paid winners would see support. He used player deposits to build americasbookie up, maybe he can repay the favor and show he belongs well above the blacklist

So what about the meeting that was supposed to take place in the second week of January? did that meeting take place?

**JasonDC** · 01-09-13, 08:22 PM

Bill Dozer thinks people need to man up and take responsibility for making a bad decision...if someone truly believes SBR is responsible for stealing their money i think they need to man up and go visit the SBR offices.

**Footballtime** · 01-09-13, 08:23 PM

1 Day Bill, I hope you and SBR john meet every person that BI ripped off in person.......... You think you guys were afraid of BI Jon and the Costa rican possy............Time to Man up.

**GamblerSpirit** · 01-09-13, 08:33 PM

Damn wtt0315 banned..that sucks
I hope Dark horse is not next..