Beware of Betphoenix slashing limits right after a deposit

[Buffalo Nickle]

i read many posts on this forum that make me lose faith in humanity, how can noone understand what they read?


if he was given the option he would have passed on the bonus, thats the point, he was never given the option, he took the bonus and accepted the rollover based on 500$ limits, his limits were cut by the book right after deposit and without warning, its a bait and switch unless they accept to return the deposit

He never would have deposited without the bonus. When someone gives you free money, they get to decide how you use the money and a book can put limits on you whether you deposit with a bonus or not.

Every person that complains about these limits is going to lose their ass.

[HedgeHog]

i read many posts on this forum that make me lose faith in humanity, how can noone understand what they read?


if he was given the option he would have passed on the bonus, thats the point, he was never given the option, he took the bonus and accepted the rollover based on 500$ limits, his limits were cut by the book right after deposit and without warning, its a bait and switch unless they accept to return the deposit

Nonsense, you always have the option to pass on a bonus. If he wanted $500 limits again, then his deposit should've been at least $1000. Bonus books typically base your limits on the amount you deposit, which is just good business sense. It shocks me that so many people here don't get it.