Hi,
yesterday the Russian premier league match between Tom Tomsk and Rostov took place.
On 2/28 Rostov made an announcement that the match will take place in their stadium even though they are the away team, because the pitch in Tom Tomsk stadium is bad shape.
You can find the link here:
http://www.fc-rostov.ru/press/news/10792
Afterwards Pinnacle and SBO posted that match.
SBO voided all bets on this match citing rule 7.1. "In the event of a change if venue (home team plays away or vice versa), all bets on the match will be void."
Pinnacle has the same rule. They graded the match. They say that because the change of venue was announced before the match was offered, bets have action.
Who is right here? Should the match have action or not?
Thanks!
yesterday the Russian premier league match between Tom Tomsk and Rostov took place.
On 2/28 Rostov made an announcement that the match will take place in their stadium even though they are the away team, because the pitch in Tom Tomsk stadium is bad shape.
You can find the link here:
http://www.fc-rostov.ru/press/news/10792
Afterwards Pinnacle and SBO posted that match.
SBO voided all bets on this match citing rule 7.1. "In the event of a change if venue (home team plays away or vice versa), all bets on the match will be void."
Pinnacle has the same rule. They graded the match. They say that because the change of venue was announced before the match was offered, bets have action.
Who is right here? Should the match have action or not?
Thanks!