Game in question is the Dallas Stars, Winnipeg Jets game. I placed two bets on under 4.5 goals in regulation when the score was 2-2. First bet was placed with 7:15 left in the third period, and the other was placed a couple seconds later. Shortly after, play was stopped around the 6:45 mark and the refs reviewed a play from a minute earlier. Link below from nhl.com….
Colton Sceviour scored his sixth goal with 7:31 left in the third period to give Dallas a 3-2 lead. It was not initially ruled a goal, but play was stopped 36 seconds later when video review determined the puck went into the Winnipeg net.
"I had no idea," Sceviour said of the play. "I don't even know what it hit. Fortunately, it was in.”
*****************************
Live, it looked like the shot hit the post so play continued and the goal was not reviewed immediately after. After review, it was determined the puck did cross the line and was ruled a good goal. Both of my bets were accepted AFTER the official goal was scored at the 7:31 mark. Play continued because no one realized at the time it crossed the line. Therefore, my wagers were placed AFTER the goal was scored.
You can damn well believe if I had the over and play continued only to later review a goal and change the call, the bet would have been no actioned as my wagers were placed after the goal.
I chatted with sbo and got the same generic response that “your bet was placed during safe period.” They showed complete and utter incompetence in addressing, or even having a fundamental understanding of the issue at hand.
I will file an official complaint with sbr to give them the correct information they need, but I felt the need to post this on the forum. There are so many books out there who do incredibly shady things in live betting, and I felt like it was my obligation to bring this to the forum’s attention.
Colton Sceviour scored his sixth goal with 7:31 left in the third period to give Dallas a 3-2 lead. It was not initially ruled a goal, but play was stopped 36 seconds later when video review determined the puck went into the Winnipeg net.
"I had no idea," Sceviour said of the play. "I don't even know what it hit. Fortunately, it was in.”
*****************************
Live, it looked like the shot hit the post so play continued and the goal was not reviewed immediately after. After review, it was determined the puck did cross the line and was ruled a good goal. Both of my bets were accepted AFTER the official goal was scored at the 7:31 mark. Play continued because no one realized at the time it crossed the line. Therefore, my wagers were placed AFTER the goal was scored.
You can damn well believe if I had the over and play continued only to later review a goal and change the call, the bet would have been no actioned as my wagers were placed after the goal.
I chatted with sbo and got the same generic response that “your bet was placed during safe period.” They showed complete and utter incompetence in addressing, or even having a fundamental understanding of the issue at hand.
I will file an official complaint with sbr to give them the correct information they need, but I felt the need to post this on the forum. There are so many books out there who do incredibly shady things in live betting, and I felt like it was my obligation to bring this to the forum’s attention.
