SBR finally lowers WSEX's grade

[Igetp2s]

I think the grade is still too high, should be B at most, but at least it's a start. Maybe this will finally get their attention that what's been going on with their payouts is unacceptable.

They can't keep milking the UEIGA as an excuse forever, when many other books (at least equal in size), aren't having nearly the trouble they are.

[obamaismyuncle]

A-, I don't understand. After all this crap WSEX has put people through, they are lowered to an A-. Are you kidding?

[Playmaker]

Its a start but my question is what took so long to lower their grade? Overall I would like to see WSEX get better with Payouts because I think its a nice Book but they must improve..I wish them the best in terms of getting their Act Together

[thespeculator]

the people on the forum are a better source of ratings , just reading people's threads about wsex, i am staying away , i don't care what the sbr ratings say, those ratings are probably the most accurate on the net, but like anything , money rules

[Casi]

Sad to see that they now have the same rating as Betonline.

[cinpls081]

You can't go by there ratings at all. They have sportsbetting rated C- and if any of the mods speak about the place they tell you its a scam (which its not) and they wouldn't put any money in it.

Then why would they not have it rated F?

Bookmaker has the worst lines in the world (so they steal this way) they bounce checks and they are rated A+....the rating system makes no sense. How could Wsex be rated A- at this point in time? honestly they clearly need to be rated lower then this

[DIF]

Bwin one ofe eurpes biggest sportbook is ranked C-. SBR have to admit their rankings sucks lately.

I feel very safe with betway. ranked D-.

[BouncedCheck]

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Sportsbetting is C- and not F because on some level, SBR knows it's not a total scam. It's also not AS safe a book as betjamaica, 5dimes, legendz, pinnacle, etc.

I've only been posting here a little over a month, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist IQ to figure out that the books with little advertisements at the top of every SBR page get a boost to their rating and the ones that don't get trashed on all the time. Sometimes that boost is justified, as with the books I just mentioned, and other times, it's not, as with WSEX and probably a couple others in the A+/A category.

[Casi]

Wsex never stiffed someone, and they are a pioneer book.
Yes there are bad things going on there atm, but everyone has been paid so far in the end (or am i wrong?).

Posting that they should be a C to D is silly, and shows how much trash is posted on forums.

[ByeShea]

Wsex never stiffed someone, and they are a pioneer book.
Yes there are bad things going on there atm, but everyone has been paid so far in the end (or am i wrong?).

Posting that they should be a C to D is silly, and shows how much trash is posted on forums.

Years in operation, never stiffed anyone. This means nothing to desperate guys who need their $300 yesterday for rent money, which I believe is the bulk of the complaining.

Momentarily forgetting that there are two sides for every story and that there actually might be a messageboard somewhere for gambling site operators to bitch about customers (probably is), but I see other posts here about customers from other sites being stiffed. About checks bouncing. NOW THAT is being screwed.

I've been a WSEX guy for years - and it's been my experience to trust them implicitly to deliver me what's mine when I win. And until that changes (or until this site is flooded with more pressing issues than how many business days their FedEx arrives), I'm sticking with them. End of story.

[Igetp2s]

Years in operation and past performance count for something, but recent history should be weighed much more heavily.

I don't care what kind of message boards they post on. Who cares? The bottom line is that their withdrawals compared to other books are unacceptably long, and that they make absolutely no effort to get better. What exactly is there for them to be complaining about? They are slow paying people, not the other way around.

And when I hear excuses that checks were lost in the mail, that is confidence shattering. We all know they never actually sent it out. They have used that excuse way too frequently for it to be even plausible. Thats great for you that implicitly trust a book everyone knows is lying to its customers. Most people here aren't as tolerant (and for good reason).

[Igetp2s]

You know who else never missed a payment until recently? Bernie Madoff.

[ByeShea]

You know who else never missed a payment until recently? Bernie Madoff.

Touche!

But still, my long-time and most recent experience with them (college bowl season) is 100% not like what I've been reading about.

[sportsbetwin]

I've only been posting here a little over a month, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist IQ to figure out that the books with little advertisements at the top of every SBR page get a boost to their rating and the ones that don't get trashed on all the time. Sometimes that boost is justified, as with the books I just mentioned, and other times, it's not, as with WSEX and probably a couple others in the A+/A category.

Spot on! SBR is better than most - but they are no angels. Books like BetOnline and WorldSport Sexchange are overated. I think alot of books from regulated countries (where the book is a listed company) are very underated. I can give you a dozen Aussie books that I would put my money before even thinking about sending it off to supposed A+ books like BetCris or Betonline or Bookmaker who reside in Costa Rica or Panama.
On the positive at least they don't rate SBGGlobal which must pay alot at other sites becuase it is often rated highly. (I know it is a scam or almost scam book)