http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/09/the-alt-right-gives-a-press-conference.html
Hillary was spot on
Hillary was spot on
-
-
Find it funny Trump is trying to capitalize on this. Comes out of the box bashing mexicans, bashing POW's, calls
women fat bigs (only Rosie) and uses the term Islamic terrorism.
Don't look at me! Look over there at Hillary!Comment -
^lol two idiots and they think no one else knows it. The shtick is hilarious guys.Comment -
lol rkelly showing what a lying idiot he isOriginally posted by rkelly110
lol rkelly showing what an idiot he is.
There is no doubt you are one the biggest white-guilt idiots I have met. A white person who supports BLM and thinks the accurate term Islamic terrorist is a problem lol! Next you're going to tell us illegal immigrants is wrong haha truly enjoy your clown show rkelly. I just don't know anyone remotely that stupid so funny when I see it.Comment -
More polls
So, they polled 1000 trump supporters and now they know millions of trump supporters are racist! 
Comment -
Not very familiar with Vox but here is an article they had something to do with and I like.
181 Clinton Foundation donors who lobbied Hillary's State Department
Updated by Jonathan Allen jon@vox.com Apr 28, 2015, 7:10a
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, second speaks with Mark Norbom, President and CEO of General Electric Greater China. Pool/Getty ImagesThe size and scope of the symbiotic relationship between the Clintons and their donors is striking. At least 181 companies, individuals, and foreign governments that have given to theClinton Foundation also lobbied the State Department when Hillary Clinton ran the place, according to a Vox analysis of foundation records and federal lobbying disclosures.
The following chart shows entities that donated to the foundation and lobbied the State Department during Hillary Clinton's tenure. The totals include funding for the foundation from both corporate and charitable arms of listed companies that lobbied State, even though the charities themselves don't necessarily lobby. One exception: The Gates Foundation, co-chaired by Microsoft co-founder and board member Bill Gates, is not Microsoft's charitable arm (that's another group) and does not register to lobby. The chart does not account for contributions made by executives, and it may omit some companies who made contributions or lobbied through subsidiaries.
CLINTON FOUNDATION DONOR GAVE BETWEEN THIS MUCH* AND THIS MUCH*
MICROSOFT/GATES FOUNDATION (GATES FOUNDATION CO-CHAIR BILL GATES IS A CO-FOUNDER AND MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF MICROSOFT, WHICH IS A SEPARATE ENTITY. BOTH DONATE TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION. ONLY MICROSOFT REPORTED LOBBYING THE STATE DEPARTMENT.) $26,000,000 NO LIMIT REPORTED WALMART/WALTON FAMILY FOUNDATION (SIMILARLY, THE WALTON FAMILY FOUNDATION IS DISTINCT FROM WALMART AND DOES NOT LOBBY. BOTH ARE RUN BY THE WALTON FAMILY.) $2,250,000 $10,500,000 COCA-COLA $5,000,000 $10,000,000 STATE OF QATAR AND RELATED ENTITIES $1,375,000 $5,800,000 GOLDMAN SACHS $1,250,000 $5,500,000 DOW CHEMICAL $1,025,000 $5,050,000 PFIZER $1,010,000 $5,025,000 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION $1,002,000 $5,010,000 EXXONMOBIL $1,001,000 $5,005,000 ALLIANCE FOR A GREEN REVOLUTION IN AFRICA $1,000,000 $5,000,000 HEWLETT-PACKARD $1,000,000 $5,000,000 NIMA TAGHAVI $1,000,000 $5,000,000 NRG ENERGY $1,000,000 $5,000,000 OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE $1,000,000 $5,000,000 PROCTER & GAMBLE $1,000,000 $5,000,000 BOEING $1,000,000 $5,000,000 OCP $1,000,000 $5,000,000 NIKE $512,000 $1,035,000 GOOGLE $511,000 $1,030,000 DAIMLER $510,000 $1,025,000 MONSANTO $501,250 $1,006,000 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY $500,000 $1,000,000 CHEVRON $500,000 $1,000,000 GENERAL ELECTRIC $500,000 $1,000,000 MORGAN STANLEY $360,000 $775,000 INTEL $252,000 $510,000 NOBLE ENERGY $250,000 $500,000 SONY $175,000 $400,000 ASTRAZENECA $150,000 $350,000 BLOOMBERG AND BLOOMBERG PHILANTHROPIES $150,000 $350,000 SALESFORCE.COM $125,000 $300,000 VERIZON $118,000 $300,000 YAHOO $125,000 $300,000 LOCKHEED MARTIN $111,000 $280,000 QUALCOMM $103,000 $265,000 TIAA-CREF $103,000 $265,000 JP MORGAN $102,000 $260,000 ACCENTURE $100,000 $250,000 AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY $100,000 $250,000 APPLIED MATERIALS $100,000 $250,000 CH2M HILL $100,000 $250,000 CORNING $100,000 $250,000 FEDEX $100,000 $250,000 GAP $100,000 $250,000 GILEAD $100,000 $250,000 HESS CORPORATION $100,000 $250,000 HUMANITY UNITED $100,000 $250,000 HYUNDAI $100,000 $250,000 INT'L BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS $100,000 $250,000 JOHNSON CONTROLS $100,000 $250,000 LIONS CLUBS INTERNATIONAL $100,000 $250,000 MYLAN $100,000 $250,000 PEPSI $100,000 $250,000 SANOFI-AVENTIS $100,000 $250,000 STARWOOD HOTELS $100,000 $250,000 UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION $100,000 $250,000 UPS $100,000 $250,000 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, ST. LOUIS $100,000 $250,000 TIME WARNER $75,000 $150,000 HUNT ALTERNATIVES $60,000 $125,000 ERICSSON $51,000 $105,000 ABBOTT LABORATORIES $50,000 $100,000 ANADARKO $50,000 $100,000 BT GROUP $50,000 $100,000 DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS $50,000 $100,000 EARTH NETWORKS $50,000 $100,000 FEED THE CHILDREN $50,000 $100,000 GENERAL MOTORS $50,000 $100,000 HILTON $50,000 $100,000 MARRIOTT $50,000 $100,000 NEXTERA ENERGY $50,000 $100,000 NOUR USA $50,000 $100,000 NOVOZYMES $50,000 $100,000 OCEANA $50,000 $100,000 STARBUCKS $50,000 $100,000 TECK RESOURCES $50,000 $100,000 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS $50,000 $100,000 NATURE CONSERVANCY $50,000 $100,000 TRILOGY INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS $50,000 $100,000 UNILEVER $50,000 $100,000 WORLD VISION $50,000 $100,000 S.C. JOHNSON & SON $50,000 $100,000 MOTOROLA $35,000 $75,000 ENEL $35,000 $75,000 JCPENNEY $27,000 $60,000 TARGET $27,000 $60,000 NOVARTIS $26,000 $55,000 PRUDENTIAL $26,000 $55,000 3M $25,000 $50,000 AAR $25,000 $50,000 AFL-CIO $25,000 $50,000 APCO WORLDWIDE $25,000 $50,000 AREVA $25,000 $50,000 BAYER $20,000 $50,000 CAPSTONE TURBINE $25,000 $50,000 CEMEX $25,000 $50,000 CHF INTERNATIONAL $25,000 $50,000 ELI LILLY $25,000 $50,000 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY $25,000 $50,000 HBO $25,000 $50,000 HONEYWELL $25,000 $50,000 MARS, INC. $25,000 $50,000 MCGRAW-HILL FINANCIAL $25,000 $50,000 MWH GLOBAL $25,000 $50,000 NEW VENTURE FUND $25,000 $50,000 PARTNERS HEALTHCARE $25,000 $50,000 ROTARY INTERNATIONAL $25,000 $50,000 SHELL $25,000 $50,000 SPECIAL OLYMPICS $25,000 $50,000 BRINK'S $25,000 $50,000 UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION $25,000 $50,000 VIACOM $25,000 $50,000 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY $25,000 $50,000 ZE-GEN $25,000 $50,000 AT&T $11,000 $30,000 BP $11,000 $30,000 SAP AMERICA $10,250 $26,000 ACTAVIS $10,000 $25,000 ALFA $10,000 $25,000 AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE $10,000 $25,000 AMGEN $10,000 $25,000 ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. $10,000 $25,000 BHP BILLITON LIMITED $10,000 $25,000 CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION $10,000 $25,000 CONOCOPHILLIPS $10,000 $25,000 DANFOSS $10,000 $25,000 DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP $10,000 $25,000 DIGITAL GLOBE $10,000 $25,000 DOW CORNING $10,000 $25,000 EMD SERONO $10,000 $25,000 ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE ASSOCIATION $10,000 $25,000 HERBALIFE $10,000 $25,000 HERMITAGE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT $10,000 $25,000 INNOVIDA HOLDINGS $10,000 $25,000 LEVI STRAUSS & CO. $10,000 $25,000 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES $10,000 $25,000 MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA $10,000 $25,000 NOKIA $10,000 $25,000 OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM $10,000 $25,000 SESAME WORKSHOP $10,000 $25,000 SIEMENS $10,000 $25,000 SNCF $10,000 $25,000 SYMANTEC $10,000 $25,000 TAMARES MANAGEMENT $10,000 $25,000 TELEFONICA INTERNATIONAL $10,000 $25,000 HERSHEY $10,000 $25,000 NASDAQ OMX GROUP $10,000 $25,000 THE PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS $10,000 $25,000 TV AZTECA, S.A. DE C.V. $10,000 $25,000 US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $10,000 $25,000 WHIRLPOOL $10,000 $25,000 ONEIDA INDIAN NATION $10,000 $25,000 AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION $5,000 $10,000 EOS FOUNDATION $5,000 $10,000 FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY $5,000 $10,000 GIRL SCOUTS OF THE USA $5,000 $10,000 GONZALO TIRADO $5,000 $10,000 NBC UNIVERSAL $5,000 $10,000 SANTA MONICA COLLEGE $5,000 $10,000 SENSIS $5,000 $10,000 ADOBE SYSTEMS $1,000 $5,000 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION $1,000 $5,000 BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB $1,000 $5,000 CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION $1,000 $5,000 CATERPILLAR $1,000 $5,000 CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA $1,000 $5,000 DEERE & COMPANY $1,000 $5,000 DELL $1,000 $5,000 EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE $1,000 $5,000 ELIGIO CEDENO $1,000 $5,000 FESTO CORPORATION $1,000 $5,000 GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY $1,000 $5,000 LABORERS INT'L UNION OF NORTH AMERICA $1,000 $5,000 NESTLE $1,000 $5,000 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION $1,000 $5,000 AMERICAN LEGION $1,000 $5,000 ASSOCIATION FOR MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY $1,000 $5,000 TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION $1,000 $5,000 HARA SOFTWARE $1,000 $5,000 ORACLE (MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM) $250 $1,000 NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY $250 $1,000
* The Clinton Foundation reports contributions in ranges.
That's not illegal, but it is scandalous.
There's a household name at the nexus of the foundation and the State Department for every letter of the alphabet but "X" (often more than one): Anheuser-Busch, Boeing, Chevron, (John) Deere, Eli Lilly, FedEx, Goldman Sachs, HBO, Intel, JP Morgan, Lockheed Martin, Monsanto, NBC Universal, Oracle, Procter & Gamble, Qualcomm, Rotary International, Siemens, Target, Unilever, Verizon, Walmart, Yahoo, and Ze-gen.
The set includes oil, defense, drug, tech, and news companies, as well as labor unions and foreign interests. It includes organizations as innocuous as the Girl Scouts and those as in need of brand-burnishing as Nike, which was once forced to vow that it would end the use of child labor in foreign sweatshops. This list of donors to the Clinton foundation who lobbied State matters because it gives a sense of just how common it was for influence-seekers to give to the Clinton Foundation, and exactly which ones did.
Author Peter Schweizer, whose book Clinton Cash is due out May 5, took his best shot but couldn't prove — or even assert — that Hillary Clinton took any official action because of contributions to the Clinton Foundation. I haven't read the book, but even Schweizer concedes that what he's identified is a "pattern of behavior," not hard evidence of corruption.
Still, the Clintons have shown they can't police themselves.
"WE MADE MISTAKES, AS MANY ORGANIZATIONS OF OUR SIZE DO"
The foundation's acting CEO, Maura Pally, acknowledged problems with reporting on federal 990 tax forms in a statement issued Sunday, in which she contended that information about donors was available but not appropriately listed in filings with the government.
Before working for the foundation, she was a deputy assistant secretary under Hillary Clinton at State.
"So yes, we made mistakes, as many organizations of our size do, but we are acting quickly to remedy them, and have taken steps to ensure they don't happen in the future," Pally said.
Bringing good things to life?
Scrutiny of the foundation's practices, and of Clinton's work at State, has intensified in recent weeks, due in large part to Schweizer's book and his effort to get news outlets to write about his research.
The New York Times published a thorough report last week on the sale of uranium mines to a company connected to the Russian government by a group of Canadians who poured millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation. The Washington Post, also working from Schweizer's research, reported that Bill Clinton collected $26 million in speaking fees from donors to the Clinton Foundation. And Newsweek reported that a company owned by Victor Pinchuk, one of the top donors to the Clinton Foundation, has shipped goods to Iran.
Public records alone reveal a nearly limitless supply of cozy relationships between the Clintons and companies with interests before the government.
"I SAW AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ADVANCING PROSPERITY IN ALGERIA AND SEIZING AN OPPORTUNITY FOR AMERICAN BUSINESS"
General Electric, for example, has given between $500,000 and $1 million in cash to the foundation, and it helped underwrite the US pavilion at the Shanghai Expo in 2010, a project for which top Clinton family fundraisers were tapped by the State Department to solicit contributions from the private sector.
GE lobbied the State Department on a variety of issues when Hillary Clinton was secretary, including trade and energy tax breaks, according to its filings with the federal government.
In her most recent memoir, Hard Choices, Hillary Clinton details how she went to bat for GE in Algeria, a country that donated $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation in violation of the charity's agreement with the Obama administration to place restrictions on contributions from foreign governments.
"When the government decided to solicit foreign bids to build power plants and modernize its energy sector, I saw an opportunity for advancing prosperity in Algeria and seizing an opportunity for American business. General Electric was competing for the more than $2.5 billion contract," she wrote. Clinton personally lobbied President Abdelaziz Bouteflika to bless the GE contract.
The kicker: Clinton allies have said she will use her work to create business for US companies overseas on the campaign trail as she runs for president. She's now in position to visit GE sites in the US and talk about how she worked to strengthen the company.
The Washington Post reported earlier this year that the Clinton Foundation failed to seek approval from the State Department when it accepted a $500,000 donation from the Algerian government for Haitian earthquake relief in 2010.
From the perspective of the Clintons' defenders, the GE deal is a win all around. The US strengthens its ties to an important geopolitical player in North Africa. GE opens up a new market. American workers benefit from the expansion of a major manufacturer. Hillary Clinton gets to campaign as a job creator. And in her defenders' view, the donations to the Clinton Foundation are unrelated to any action Hillary Clinton took on behalf of GE.
Likewise, Coca-Cola has given between $5 million and $10 million to the foundation. The company announced an investment of $200 million in Burma after Hillary Clinton worked to lift sanctions on that country. Even unions that blame Bill Clinton's NAFTA deal for killing American jobs, including the AFL-CIO, pop up on the crosstab of companies that donate to the foundation and lobbied Hillary's State Department. Coke, of course, was one of the biggest beneficiaries of NAFTA, which opened up Mexico, the country with the highest per-capita Coca-Cola consumption in the world.
Still, no one — no one — has produced anything close to evidence of a quid pro quo in which Hillary Clinton took official action in exchange for contributions to the Clinton Foundation. If anyone did, Clinton would cease to be a candidate and become a defendant.
The 'trust us' model is broken
It's unthinkable that Hillary Clinton would intentionally undermine the interests of the United States as secretary of state, not because she is above question but because she planned to run for president.
Clinton allies make no secret of their model of using the family brand to leverage other people's money, intellectual capital, products, celebrity, and political networks to serve the Clintons' ends. They believe those ends are just and often noble — like providing clean drinking water in developing countries — and that the Clintons are beyond reproach. But it's reasonable, and necessary, to ask whether the business interests of the benefactors are incidental or central to their motivation for giving.
It should come as no surprise that the folks who have a lot of cash to give are also those who have the most at stake in decisions made by the federal government. That's why politicians get so much money from special interests. It's also why the voting public should be aware, and wary, of the flow of money from special interests to candidates and elected officials.Transparency is not an antidote to corruption, so that money flow deserves intense scrutiny.
RelatedHillary Clinton's foundation problem isn't going away
Whitewater, explained for people who don't remember the Clinton presidency
Ultimately, it is impossible to tell where one end of the two-headed Clinton political and philanthropic operation ends and where the other begins. The "trust us" model is insufficient for the public. It's also an ongoing political liability for Hillary Clinton. Both she and the public would benefit from greater controls. She's not the first politician forced to defend contributions to her charity. Tom DeLay, the legendary former House majority leader and whip, was hammered by the left for taking donations for his children's charity from corporations and lobbyists with business before Congress.
On one level, there's little difference between special interests donating money to politicians' campaigns and donating to their charities. The nature of the objections raised by the Clintons taking money from interested parties also applies to their solicitation of contributions to her presidential campaign — and to similar asks made by every other politician. On another level, though, a politician's charity is a special avenue of access.
Politicians' charities are an attractive place for special interests to funnel money. They can give much larger sums to charities than they can in hard campaign dollars. Because the charities are, by definition, nonpartisan, the contributions look less political. The politician who runs the charity usually has a pretty strong emotional tie to its sustainability and often benefits from payment in the form of travel and accommodations in conjunction with the charity's activities. Last but not least, donations to the charity are tax-deductible, in contrast to campaign contributions.
Candidates for office should seek to set the bar for their own conduct higher than the level required by current law. More important, at a time when the American public has rightly lost confidence that politicians serve the public first, foremost, and exclusively, Hillary Clinton has fallen short of that standard.
Comment -
I think she forgot to mention that Donald Trump himself is in that basket.
Hard to put a number on it, but I don't think she was off by that much with half. Maybe it's closer to 1/3. Trump will probably get close to 60 mil votes. So 1/2 would be 30 mil. That's only 10% of the country. 10% of the country as deplorable is not unreasonable and virtually every deplorable will pull the lever for Trump.Comment -
Clinton foundation was better rated than the Red cross.
Love how there are no exact figures in those donation figures. From this to that.
Comment -
lol by who again?Originally posted by rkelly110Clinton foundation was better rated than the Red cross.
Love how there are no exact figures in those donation figures. From this to that.
you just can't help it can ya?
the 9/11 thread, the hillary's america thread and now this one. What a roll, like I predicted too.
23:59:59Comment -
Get out of your bubble, everyone is racist.Comment -
Trump is laughing all the way to the bank. You guys are his pawns. How much money have you guys given?Comment -
Originally posted by rkelly110
lol keep running your embarrassments. They are not going anywhere.Comment -
Richard Spencer has a cool haircut.Originally posted by Turd FergusonComment -
Comment -
20 points if you prove where any of those are factually false. Go....Originally posted by rkelly110Comment -
The truth hurts. Just look at all the butt hurt Trumptards replying to this thread. Hits close to home for them.
Comment -
Originally posted by Shafted69
Comment -
Kentucky GOP Governor, another deplorable inciting violence.
Comment -
Comment -
I bet $25 on June 16th 2015 for Trump to win the REPUBLICAN NOMINATION to win $500 at 5D.Originally posted by rkelly110
So far I've given BACK $160 to the TRUMP campaign for a job well done.
And remember 'DEPLORABLE LIVES MATTER"Comment -
the woman who got a pedophile she felt was guilty off the hook is calling people deplorable lolComment -
This.Originally posted by rkelly110Comment -
So Hillay claims:
Donald Trump doesn't have the temperment for president because he resorts to name calling;
& half of his supporters are homophobic, racist, sexist, xenophobic, islamophobic, you name it.Comment -
Why shouldn't a racist be called a racist? I thought you you can't fight something without calling it by it's name?Originally posted by 15805Comment -
I nominated your post for your honesty.Originally posted by 15805Comment -
Another deplorable taking the Jefferson quote out of context. Imagine living in the place where people voted for this guy...
Comment -
My mistake. Clinton foundation rated as high as, not better than the Red cross.Originally posted by rkelly110Clinton foundation was better rated than the Red cross.
Love how there are no exact figures in those donation figures. From this to that.
Watch here on the Clinton News Network: http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2...ndation-lv.cnnComment -
Originally posted by rkelly110
yes, good job sheepy you're doing your part. Keep posting that bias nonsense, those "my truths" lol
lol Clinton foundation a charity, what a penetrating moronComment -
Says the retard who has never done anything for anyone. You aren't qualified to wipe the Clinton's assOriginally posted by brooks85Comment -
Originally posted by Greget
lol another member of rkelly's family tree. Has to be since only someone that stupid would say family members of benghazi support hillary. At least rkelly takes pride in his stupidity which is great for the clown show. Your show is funny but obvious you're a ghost account.Comment -
What have you done for humanity?Originally posted by brooks85
The Clinton Foundation has saved millions of lives. You sell hotdogs for meth.
End of discussion.Comment -
you are a moron but that isn't news at allOriginally posted by Greget
lol you are really stupidComment -
Your effort to to draw something of value out of brooks is laudable, but inevitably a complete waste of time. I have given up that pursuit and feel more fulfilled for it. Just food for thought.Originally posted by Greget
Watch how he responds to this with a worthless comment and I ignore it.Comment -
Originally posted by d2bets
d2 pretending his post history doesn't show what a lying scumbag idiot he is. The desperation lol
Hey d2, if 1 is increased by 500% what is the answer? lol moronComment
