Going With Packers Tomorrow Night..All The Squares On The Bears

zola · 09-13-12, 06:32 AM

Bears +6

How will weather be?

Thinking about the under too

BigDeem5 · 09-13-12, 06:46 AM

Without jennings it will stall the offense a bit, hes a big contributor

PAULYPOKER · 09-13-12, 06:47 AM

Books don't want no parts of da bears action,ATS or ML..................

theHoneyBadger · 09-13-12, 07:36 AM

week 1 over reaction = anyone who is saying alshon jeffrey is one of the big reasons why the bears are elite...

GunShard · 09-13-12, 07:37 AM

When squares like Lakerboy, Brock Landers and Greeny from ESPN are on the Bears.

Your Packers bet became a strong lock.

Statman · 09-13-12, 07:44 AM

Divisional game....Jennings out for GB...Chi has a great running + passing game and taking +6 ?

Chicago for me in this one

My only fear is that we've seen Cutler throw way to many INT's when the pressure is on him. I don't see that happening with the GB D at this point but we'll know how his O line sees things in the first quarter

Good luck in your plays

Big Bear · 09-13-12, 07:50 AM

square plays this week are:
Saints -2.5
Redskins -2.5
Seahawks +3
Ravens +1
Lions +7
Broncos +3

orioles · 09-13-12, 08:05 AM

How did the Slackers do in the Playoffs last year without Jennings? Thursday night games usually go under. Slackers D looks old and slow. Dog and Under.

Mr Handicapable · 09-13-12, 08:09 AM

Yes Rodgers is better than Cutler but once you double Matthews nobody gets near the QB for GB. Plus Chicago picked up Michael Bush to move the pile....compare him to Cedric fumble Benson....who completely sucks. The Bears defense is getting old and they're not great either but Chicago is better all the way around except for Rodgers, Matthews, and Woodson. 27-26 Green Bay in a thriller...Bears +6 for me!!

d2bets · 09-13-12, 08:47 AM

Originally posted by theHoneyBadger

week 1 over reaction = anyone who is saying alshon jeffrey is one of the big reasons why the bears are elite...

He is one of the reasons, and he didn't even have that good of a good game in Week 1. He won't put up huge numbers though because he's a rookie and part of a group that will catch a lot. But Marshall/Jefferey vs. RWilliams/JKnox is the main reason the Bears will be so much better on offense.

fergie's balls · 09-13-12, 09:04 AM

5 dimes down to bears +5 -110

zola · 09-13-12, 09:15 AM

Let's get this $

hubie69 · 09-13-12, 09:17 AM

Classic JJ misdirection thread

McBa1n · 09-13-12, 11:15 AM

Lots of great information in this thread! (lol Packer D or corners are old - sheesh, do you even watch football? haha)

I have no action on the game - I got too emotionally connected to the game, so I'm out.
The Bears were the best or 2nd best team in the NFC EASY last year when Cutler got hurt, in spite of a bottom 10 O Line. Add in Marshall and move Earl Bennett (who is solid) down the depth chart? Now they have strong receiving corps.
What they still lack is an O Line. The game Sunday did change for them when Freeney got injured, obviously... And it went from a ballgame to a blowout.

Only way the Packers have a chance in this is to outscore the Bears (not likely - even if Peanut Tillman doesn't go), or if they are able to sustain pressure on Cutler/get a lot of turnovers. The Bears weakness is at LT. The Packers strength is that Matthews now rushes off that side. I figure the Bears are going to run the ball a LOT that direction, set up the play action for 20 yard down the field routes (the Packer's biggest weakness with their personnel is the 15-20 yard dig) and control the ball.

The only way the Bears lose this one is if they beat themselves... The Packer D is as bad as I've ever seen watching the NFL (preseason + week 1 vs Alex Smith and a balanced 9r attack). They are very soft vs the run and incredibly poor against the pass. Without turnovers, the Pack has 0 chance. If they can get a couple of big picks/fumble recoveries - they can score enough to win. That's a big if. The Bears D is not what it was. It's better than average, but I don't think you can count on them winning games or stealing games for the team anymore.

Mr Handicapable · 09-13-12, 11:59 AM

Originally posted by McBa1n

Lots of great information in this thread! (lol Packer D or corners are old - sheesh, do you even watch football? haha)

I have no action on the game - I got too emotionally connected to the game, so I'm out.
The Bears were the best or 2nd best team in the NFC EASY last year when Cutler got hurt, in spite of a bottom 10 O Line. Add in Marshall and move Earl Bennett (who is solid) down the depth chart? Now they have strong receiving corps.
What they still lack is an O Line. The game Sunday did change for them when Freeney got injured, obviously... And it went from a ballgame to a blowout.

Only way the Packers have a chance in this is to outscore the Bears (not likely - even if Peanut Tillman doesn't go), or if they are able to sustain pressure on Cutler/get a lot of turnovers. The Bears weakness is at LT. The Packers strength is that Matthews now rushes off that side. I figure the Bears are going to run the ball a LOT that direction, set up the play action for 20 yard down the field routes (the Packer's biggest weakness with their personnel is the 15-20 yard dig) and control the ball.

The only way the Bears lose this one is if they beat themselves... The Packer D is as bad as I've ever seen watching the NFL (preseason + week 1 vs Alex Smith and a balanced 9r attack). They are very soft vs the run and incredibly poor against the pass. Without turnovers, the Pack has 0 chance. If they can get a couple of big picks/fumble recoveries - they can score enough to win. That's a big if. The Bears D is not what it was. It's better than average, but I don't think you can count on them winning games or stealing games for the team anymore.

Good analysis....Urlacher's health could be big here with Jennings hurt and Finley becoming a much bigger part of GBs attack. Cutler holds all the cards w/Forte and Bush to give them balance while Rodgers has to do it all himself. Rodgers is great enough to win games by himself ala Peyton w/many of the Indy teams but I'm happy to take the easily superior team with +6.

frostno98 · 09-13-12, 03:43 PM

Yeah the Under seems like a smart play and Bears. Teams aren't that explosive with just 3 days of rest.

BIGDAY · 09-13-12, 03:46 PM

I bit on Packers ML. -220

Juicy, but a winner.

PhillyFlyers · 09-13-12, 03:48 PM

Yeah, sure you are.

Just like you were going with the Giants, then posted pictures of all your Cowboys ML betting slips.

GunShard · 09-13-12, 10:44 PM

Easy money.

McBa1n · 09-13-12, 11:27 PM

Surprised. The Bears had a good game plan going in offensively, taking the ball out of Cutler's hands. They should've run the ball more - the Pack was cover 2 or cover 3 all night.
Bears shot themselves in the foot time/again.

LizReed44 · 09-13-12, 11:37 PM

Mistakes (and an inability to block Clay Matthews) just killed the Bears all night long.

...and you just can't give up a TD on a fake FG.

Goat Milk · 09-14-12, 03:27 AM

Originally posted by PAULYPOKER

Books don't want no parts of da bears action,ATS or ML..................

good call as usual pauly

Pat McCrotch · 09-14-12, 03:42 AM

Credit were credits due

Well done jj u mo-fo

Watched ur oddsmaker video on you tube and that shit was funny as fukk man

jjgold · 09-14-12, 05:19 AM

Patty thanks

When Cutler is your QB you know things will not go great
He is not a big timer period

PAULYPOKER · 09-14-12, 05:28 AM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

good call as usual pauly

My post was true ,

book manipulation on the public which you will never understand,

was not practiced on this particular game,

books were afraid to wager on GB,

simple as that...............

Pat McCrotch · 09-14-12, 05:39 AM

Jj who u betting in the saints match

Im thinking of going ball deep on the saints

The same thing will happen as happened last night

Everyone saying the saints are shitt

They win by 21+ in my opinion!!

Statman · 09-14-12, 06:16 AM

While my bet was a loser on Chi, I have to admit that the fake GB FG play was perfectly executed...

k13 · 09-14-12, 11:53 AM

Originally posted by jjgold

Packers home

Cutler will be scared

Bears look too easy

This will not be close

Rogers sounds confident

Spot on JJ. Bury these squares.

k13 · 09-14-12, 12:10 PM

Originally posted by PickWinnerAllDay

Bears have the better offense. Time to accept it.

Forte got his yards consistently even when the Bears couldn't pass the ball.

Now that they can, he will have more running room than ever. Simple logic. Some people don't have it. Bears were a good team before adding Marshall/Jeffery. Now they are a great team. Period.

Some people can't take the blinders off.
So the better offense scores 10 points on a team that according to everyone here has no D.
Great logic. Great team.