Boys take NL overs the rest of September

[Matt Rain]

Gaussal

Gaussian

Scientific rigor, n1gga.

[mathdotcom]

Gaussian

Scientific rigor, n1gga.

The purposeful mis-spelling is the whole point

[Matt Rain]

I don't speak English.

[mathdotcom]

None of your frog brethren do, that's why you should leave already and enjoy being a third world country

Fukking welfare province

[Matt Rain]

I'm an Ontarian now pal.

It's worse than a welfare province. It's filled with public sector thieves and fraudsters.

Fok Quebec (Govt)

[mathdotcom]

AGREED
Small time mentality in both provinces

Will be in Vegas 2014

[mathdotcom]

Oh so this thread only gets bumped when unders come in?

[jjgold]

Mathy your sharp
It's why you work at home depot

[mathdotcom]

Mathy your sharp
It's why you work at home depot

Great way for independent carpenter man like myself to cut costs

[No coincidences]

Looks like a big day for you today. Congrats.

[mathdotcom]

Yes

Now get out of my thread

Real bettors only

[No coincidences]

Yes

Now get out of my thread

Real bettors only

You're still way down on posted plays. Fact.

[mathdotcom]

Prove it

[No coincidences]

Prove it

More like you prove otherwise.

I already linked all your losers. The only play you actually posted an amount to was your $20,000 total loss. Otherwise, we have no idea how much you're betting or even if you're betting these games.

It's not my fault you're too chickenshit to start an actual thread and track +/- units.

[mathdotcom]

You made a statement, you back it up

End of discussion

[No coincidences]

You made a statement, you back it up

End of discussion

OK, in posted plays with actual money amounts involved this year, you're 0-1 and down $20,000. There.

[mathdotcom]

Again.. not true. Posted Greek figures for NBA.

You are like 0/3 in this thread today

[No coincidences]

Again.. not true. Posted Greek figures for NBA.

You are like 0/3 in this thread today

Those posted Greek figures don't make up for a $20,000 loss pal.

I stand by my original statement.

[mathdotcom]

By the way I have 309,000 on the 49ers ML tonight

[No coincidences]

By the way I have 309,000 on the 49ers ML tonight

Screen shot?

I also forgot about this one (post #48, claiming you had over $1.4 million dollars on the Steelers ML last week that crashed and burned):

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/1885500-pinnacle-begging-you-tease-bills-chiefs-p2.html

Good ol' make-believe mathy. Another epic fail. I own you.

[No coincidences]

Can't wait for "ronald" to show up soon and defend your fantasyland posts.

[No coincidences]

Where's the quick response, mathy? Did you or did you not have over $1.4 million on the Steelers last Sunday night? Or does that one not count?

[mathdotcom]

Thank you for your reply. I have now fully mapped out every No Coincidences thread possible.

1. Mathy you lost
1.1. Mathy you were on the opposite side of that winner you posted
1.1.1. Mathy you lost $x on this play
1.1.2. Mathy you did not win $y on that play because there is no screenshot
1.2 Mathy you were not on the opposite side of the loser you posted
1.2.1. Mathy prove it with a screenshot
1.2.1.1. Mathy you edited that screenshot
1.2.1. Mathy you're down on posted plays
1.2.1.1. Mathy you lost $20,000 on the Colts because you told Deuce to take them
1.2.1.2. Mathy you did not have the Packers because you said not to bet favorites
1.3.1. Mathy you've never won a bet
1.3.1.1. Mathy it's a fact you're down
1.3.1.1.1. Mathy it's not my job to prove my statements
1.3.1.1.2. Mathy you lost $20,000 two months ago
1.3.1.1.3. Mathy I don't believe you bet $20,000 on the Packers

So much fun. Wonder which route to choose today.

[mathdotcom]

Correct, 1.4m on Pitt.

Adding $2.3m on WAS/ATL over tonight.

Please track, thank you.

[No coincidences]

Correct, 1.4m on Pitt.

Adding $2.3m on WAS/ATL over tonight.

Please track, thank you.

So at this very moment, are you down or aren't you on posted plays with $$$ assigned to them after that Steelers loss? That's all I'm asking. You wanted me to prove it, so I did. I'm sorry I'm frustrating you so much. Don't get too tangled in your own web of lies.

[No coincidences]

Correct, 1.4m on Pitt.

Adding $2.3m on WAS/ATL over tonight.

Please track, thank you.

$2.3 million, eh?

I suppose it's too much to ask for any validation, though.

[mathdotcom]

So at this very moment, are you down or aren't you on posted plays with $$$ assigned to them after that Steelers loss? That's all I'm asking. You wanted me to prove it, so I did.

=

You're still way down on posted plays. Fact.

How much would you like to bet that 1. at Pinnacle I wager over 100k a month, and 2. I have not had a losing month this year.

Please offer terms.

Thank you

[mathdotcom]

2.7 million now

Got a good number

[No coincidences]

=



How much would you like to bet that 1. at pinnacle I wager over 100k a month, and 2. I have not had a losing month this year.

Please offer terms.

Thank you

Look, don't get offended. You asked me to perform a simple task. I did. Whatever plays you make on your own time is a moot point here.

You dick around all the time and now you want to get serious -- and truthful. The simple fact of the matter is you said "prove it" after I said you were down on posted plays. So I did. Unless you can dig up a post or thread that erases that Steeler bet from last week, I've done just that.

So, in your words, "end of discussion." Sorry to say that tonight's gajillion dollar bet on the MLB over is irrelevant re: this argument.

[mathdotcom]

Bought back on the under

$400 on over now

[mathdotcom]

Could be record number of runs scored in San Diego

[You mad bro]

i bet 13.3 trillion on the braves tonight RRL +245

[No coincidences]

2-7 tonight
4-15 this week
2-17 games over 11

[No coincidences]

2.7 million now

Got a good number

Bought back on the under

$400 on over now

How much juice do you eat when buying back a $2.7 million bet?

[jjgold]

2-7 tonight
4-15 this week
2-17 games over 11

This guy is good