Honest thoughts here

JAKEPEAVY21 · 07-03-12, 12:37 PM

the precedent was set with your previous winner that was "no action"..but whose responsibility is it to know what time that games start? The book should take the lines down right away to avoid this type of issue...

YorkHunt · 07-03-12, 12:41 PM

This happened at bookmaker. I put in a second half MLB wager didnt even look at the score or inning. It was already in the 7th and they still accepted my wager. I called back after I saw that and said WTF why is the line still up your lucky I didnt see the score or would have went the other way as I was losing. They said sorry and according to their policies this is their fault and it becomes a no play.

shari91 · 07-03-12, 12:46 PM

It gets a bit scary if you have a history of past posting at a book. You risk going from the shooter to the shootee when you do it more than once. It should be cancelled though if that's what their rules state.

wtt0315 · 07-03-12, 12:52 PM

both times were tennis matches that were moved due to rain. Both were about 5 mins after start. No i do not have a history of past posting and i actually take offense to that. Like i am going risked my account by wagering on a match that is 1-1 in the first. Both times were done when i logged in and saw match was about to start according to their times and i knew the matches had been delayed by weather from previous times. I didnt have a clue as the matches actually had started. Don't really care either way as neither were big bets. Just wondering about it.

shari91 · 07-03-12, 02:18 PM

Originally posted by wtt0315

both times were tennis matches that were moved due to rain. Both were about 5 mins after start. No i do not have a history of past posting and i actually take offense to that. Like i am going risked my account by wagering on a match that is 1-1 in the first. Both times were done when i logged in and saw match was about to start according to their times and i knew the matches had been delayed by weather from previous times. I didnt have a clue as the matches actually had started. Don't really care either way as neither were big bets. Just wondering about it.

Not sure what you're taking offence to. Your first sentence didn't even refer to how long after the match started that you placed the bet. Within a couple of weeks you do it again. Do a search on the forum and you'll see that depending on the book this alone is enough to demonstrate your 'history'. GL.

Cuse0323 · 07-03-12, 02:56 PM

These books will take advantage of you when they can and not allow it when you're against them. BI/Bookmaker, all shit. Unless you're a winner against them. Shari knows, but now she's a paid shill, no book is safe in the US during baseball season.

Smoke · 07-03-12, 04:06 PM

unreal

shari91 · 07-03-12, 04:40 PM

Originally posted by Cuse0323

These books will take advantage of you when they can and not allow it when you're against them. BI/Bookmaker, all shit. Unless you're a winner against them. Shari knows, but now she's a paid shill, no book is safe in the US during baseball season.

Come on Cuse, I say repeatedly on here that I won't give my opinions about specific books that I don't or can't play it. Not part of my job and if I were asked to shill I wouldn't work here. Most of the regulars would see through that crap quite easily - especially from me since many know the books I play at. FFS I even posted a deal last night that Paddy Power is offering on tennis right now and they're not even an SBR sponsor.

I'm just going on what I know personally and what I've seen others post on here... past post once, yeah books will usually give you the benefit of the doubt. Do it again - especially in the same sport and within a short time frame - and things might start getting murky.

ACoochy · 07-03-12, 05:12 PM

Wtt0315, long time no hear pal.

No more talk. U know what I mean ;-)

BEANTOWNJIM · 07-03-12, 06:06 PM

WHY DONT YOU ASK YOUR BOSS SHARI HE THINKS ITS FINE IF A SPORTSBOOK ACCEPTS A BET 15 MINUTES AFTER A GAME STARTS THEN GRADES IT IN THERE FAVOR WHEN YOU LOSE

WE ALL KNOW ABOUT THE GREAT CASCADE SPORTSBOOK ROBBERY OF ME IN WICH SBR JOHN THOUGHT LENNY FROM CASCADE COULD ACCEPT A BET 15 MINUTES AFTER THE GAME STARTED THEN GRADE IT IN HIS FAVOR WHEN IT LOST

GREAT WATCHDOG HUH BOYS

SBR JOHN THINKS SPORTSBOOK CAN ACCEPT BETS 15 MINUTES AFTER A GAME STARTS AND GRADE IT IN THERE FAVOR WHEN IT LOSES

THAT TELLS YOU ALL YOU HAVE TO KNOW ABOUT SBR JOHN HE WOULD SELL OUT THE PLAYER EVERY TIME FOR ADVERTISING DOLLARS

F-CK HIM

Cuse0323 · 07-04-12, 01:34 AM

Originally posted by shari91

Come on Cuse, I say repeatedly on here that I won't give my opinions about specific books that I don't or can't play it. Not part of my job and if I were asked to shill I wouldn't work here. Most of the regulars would see through that crap quite easily - especially from me since many know the books I play at. FFS I even posted a deal last night that Paddy Power is offering on tennis right now and they're not even an SBR sponsor.

I'm just going on what I know personally and what I've seen others post on here... past post once, yeah books will usually give you the benefit of the doubt. Do it again - especially in the same sport and within a short time frame - and things might start getting murky.

My bad Shari, I barely remember the post I made, had to check my history to see what I posted. I think that was my last thought before I fell asleep and of course it was an angry one for no reason. For the most part I agree with what I said in a haze but don't know why I came at you, sorry.