do you really think pacquiao won?

[allabout the $$$]

watching this video puts some doubt in my mind. i didnt watch the fight just going by what ive read and watched

http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhA3T135YUcXkOqtPX

can someone embed this link thanks

[AraiWa]

[LostBankroll]

Draw

[ballahollic2]

I agree with Lost. I would say 114-114 is about right

[2daBank]

"its amazing bradley still alive"..

that was great

[Imsmarterthanu]

Manny Pacquaio won the fight no doubt in my mind. You act like the entire world was watching it on HBO. Mexico wasn't watching it on HBO and neither was Europe and they all thought Pacquiao won. What about the people at the event watching it live were there perceptions swayed by HBO commentary too ? This conspiracy theory is a little far fetched.

[sideloaded]

No, he clearly lost to juan marquez but nobody cared because everyone likes pacquiao more than juan.

[Luca Fury]

The commentary was biased, yes. But that video doesn't show all the times where Pacquiao's punches DID land, and he DID wobble Bradley.

I could go back to any fight where one guy clearly won and/or dominated, and do slow-motion on certain sequences where the winning fighter missed punches that we thought landed live. You can do that for pretty much any fight, but it doesn't mean all the offense that he DID land suddenly doesn't matter.

All that video proves is that the commentary was biased, which we already knew. Jim Lampley is a Pac-Man fanboy and everybody knew that before the fight, this is just further proof of that. The video does NOT, however, prove that Bradley deserved the decision.

Also, in some of the slow-mo shots where the video says Pacquiao missed, you could either see that A) he actually DID indeed, or B), it was hard to tell because the creator turned the video black and white, as well as dimmed the brightness to make it hard to tell what really happened. Also, he stops the slow-mo at certain spots to cut out the punches that landed.

So, while the commentary was definitely biased FOR Pacquiao, this video is equally biased AGAINST him. Two wrongs don't make a right....

[Grits n' Gravy]

No, he clearly lost to juan marquez but nobody cared because everyone likes pacquiao more than juan.

You like men.

[sideloaded]

You like men.

Only a gay man would care.

[Luca Fury]

You like men.

Only a gay man would care.

[iQon]

Stopped watching when the first thing they pointed out is a "hip shot".

I don't think anyone who truly follows boxing believed that was a clean shot in live action. and the punch was low. Speaks volumes.

This biased video was probably made by the same amateur who created the Marquez "foot stopper". Brilliant boxing minds on youtube.

[SBR Lou]

Great video.

[paranoyd androyd]

Lampley's been a joke for a while now.

[Mac4Lyfe]

I had money on Bradley (+360) and that's all that fukking counts...

[ttwarrior1]

put it on bradley next time and see what happens

[SBR Lou]

put it on bradley next time and see what happens

He'll probably win more decisively.

[Ghenghis Kahn]

No, he clearly lost to juan marquez but nobody cared because everyone likes pacquiao more than juan.

orly? i watched that fight and i didn't think he lost the fight. so it's basically your opinion.

[Ghenghis Kahn]

He'll probably win more decisively.

oh lou you scared for mayweather? if pac-man loses for the second time whether fixed or not, that mega-fight will not be that mega anymore. but you already know that...

[sideloaded]

orly? i watched that fight and i didn't think he lost the fight. so it's basically your opinion.

cool story bro

[SBR Lou]

oh lou you scared for mayweather? if pac-man loses for the second time whether fixed or not, that mega-fight will not be that mega anymore. but you already know that...

Yeah, real scared that a guy with four losses, two draws, and who should have at least a fifth loss from one of the Marquez fights would just destroy an undefeated fighter who out-earns him by 50%+ and isn't so foolish as to be handcuffed to a promoter.

You're right, Manny's superior speed, defensive skills, height, power, and recent form should absolutely scare the heck out of a Floyd fan.

What's funny is Pac fans will probably say Mayweather waited until Pac got too old to destroy him — yet Floyd's actually two years older. LOL.

[hawkwind]

Yep, He won!!!

[bobby heenan]

Yeah, real scared that a guy with four losses, two draws, and who should have at least a fifth loss from one of the Marquez fights would just destroy an undefeated fighter who out-earns him by 50%+ and isn't so foolish as to be handcuffed to a promoter.

You're right, Manny's superior speed, defensive skills, height, power, and recent form should absolutely scare the heck out of a Floyd fan.

What's funny is Pac fans will probably say Mayweather waited until Pac got too old to destroy him — yet Floyd's actually two years older. LOL.

over the last 3 years ive heard just about everything under the sun from pactards....they dont have a leg to stand on anymore

[sideloaded]

Ghenghis con is the classic know it all boxing fan who only watches pacquiao or mayweather fights and thinks he knows f-ck all about boxing. Hey big boy go read any pro fighter or expert opinion after pacquaio marquez 3, none of them said pacquaio won. Actually the only people that did watch boxing 2-3 times a year IE you the casual fan. GTFO of here kid. You tried to look cool and outed yourself as another pactard loser.