Originally posted by Gamble32jn
-
Gamble? Are you ok? Where have you been?Comment -
good betOriginally posted by MagicDiceFlow
Ticket Details : # 45458180-1
Wager Type : Team Total
Wager Status : Pending
Risk / To Win Amount : 800.00 / 571.43(USD)
Accepted : 6/10/2012 4:37PM - PST
Sport / Period : MLB Baseball / Game
Selection : Detroit Tigers6/10/2012 5:05:01PM - (PST)
Team Total Over4-140
Pitchers : D. Smyly - L - Must Pitch / H. Bailey - R - Must Pitch
Game Notes : (ESPN) TIME CHANGE
Comment -
you got a horrible line on the tt.. pinny had 4 -102Comment -
That run was BS. The ball never touched the guy..Comment -
reminded me of thisOriginally posted by Tofudogbut got away
Comment -
Comment -
Pinny took a bath on this game. They had great TT numbers for an over, offered + money on the over 9, and gave the Tigers away for the highest + price on the board.Originally posted by lunchbawks
So much for the "sharp" book tonight.Comment -
1 down, 2 mo to go!!!! Lets go.
Comment -
Cairo ****** me friday, not again please.Comment -
2 down, 1 mo to go!!!! Lets go.
Comment -
not sharp at all tonight
Originally posted by No coincidencesComment -
Picked the tigers with my points - one more outComment -
Roar!!!!!! Oh baby.
.
Comment -
Ball gameComment -
Time to watch some AFL now. Good nite fellas.Comment -
i dont agree with ur entire assessment here.Originally posted by No coincidences
total was + money but it was 9.5 where other books 9-120.. so pinny protected a bit from much action
team total on tigers was ov 4 -114 near close and therefore juiced up a tad high on their standards
and as far as the + money on detroit dog...
tons of people subscribe to line services and chase steam.. pinny steamed the shit out of cincy the last ten mins and i would be willing to bet late "fake sharps" lost their tale on this game
the +1.5 line also dropped to psych-out line watchers by seeing the -1.5 cincy rise quickly
-stashComment -
Pinny closed at 9 (+106) on the over -- not 9.5. And this is with the public hammering the over and Bodog offering the over at 9 (-120).Originally posted by secretstashi dont agree with ur entire assessment here.
total was + money but it was 9.5 where other books 9-120.. so pinny protected a bit from much action
team total on tigers was ov 4 -114 near close and therefore juiced up a tad high on their standards
and as far as the + money on detroit dog...
tons of people subscribe to line services and chase steam.. pinny steamed the shit out of cincy the last ten mins and i would be willing to bet late "fake sharps" lost their tale on this game
the +1.5 line also dropped to psych-out line watchers by seeing the -1.5 cincy rise quickly
-stash
They also had Cincy +119 while Bodog, by comparison, only had +110. You don't see plays cash very often when you "beat" Pinny by 9 cents at another book.Comment -
Originally posted by No coincidences
"This is why my basketball intelligence is unmatched on this site. I'm sure there are better cappers but no one can tell you the strategies of most coaches before the game even starts "
Goat MilkComment -
Stop comparing pinny and bovada no coin.Comment -
What do you mean? Most of the time, if Pinny's offering a total at 9 with the over at +100 and Bodog's offering a 9 with the under at +100, you can hammer the under at Bodog and never look back. It's typically an easy cash -- just wasn't here.Originally posted by t-wizzle
I'm not "comparing" the books necessarily -- just pointing out the typical "flaws" that Bovada and other rec. books are exposed to vs. a sharp one like Pinny. Didn't pan out that way in this one though.Comment -
I'm just saying pinnacle to bodog is apples to oranges.Comment -
So if Pinny closes at +119/-126 on a play and Bovada +110/-120, are you saying it's irrelevant?Originally posted by t-wizzleComment -
Yes. I think you are over-complicating things. I would only watch Pinnacle and Greek.
If you want to expose visible and take advantage of their lines than that is a different issue entirely.Comment -
If sharp money is bumping a play to +119/-126 at Pinny and a rec. book is hanging a +110/-120, I'll take the fave in that situation at Bodog every time. Same goes for the way the total closed tonight at Pinny vs. Bodog. Why is that "overcomplicating things"? If anything, it's probably a little too simplistic.Originally posted by t-wizzleComment -
Do you remember lakerboy explaining how pinny's model is to offer the best lines the other night?
Also, pubes still love the tigers hence the lower line at a shop like bodog.Comment -
It's pretty rare that you can get a dog at a better price at Pinny vs. the rec. shops at close. If so, there's typically a reason for it (the dog ain't barking).Originally posted by t-wizzle
There were a lot of exceptions today though, and there have been throughout Interleague. I don't know if it's just harder for the books to get reads on these games or what. I'm not saying you can't get the "best lines" at Pinny, but it's typically of the reduced juice variety on faves.
That's why it surprised me to see a game like tonight, where Cincy closed 6 cents higher at Pinny and Detroit was offered at a price 9 cents better. Then again, Cincy wins that game about 97 times out of 100.Comment -
Great, GREAT finish.
To have the Blue Jays come back from a 4-run deficit and now the Tigers the same. 3-3 on my card today NAISHE.
GREAT GAME, if nobody had money on that game- still would have been great w/ popcorn.Comment
