Romney "every new computer sold in US to have filter to block porn"
Collapse
X
-
maersksealandSBR MVP
- 09-17-09
- 1673
#1Romney "every new computer sold in US to have filter to block porn"Tags: None -
brettelsSBR MVP
- 11-04-10
- 3376
#2It's a good ideaComment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#390% of parents will agreeComment -
ChalkyDogSBR Hall of Famer
- 10-02-11
- 9598
#4HAHAHAHA!!! That is worse than SOPA or CISPA. Blocking porn basically makes the internet obsolete.
Good luck with that.Comment -
B1GER1C828SBR Posting Legend
- 07-31-07
- 10244
#5I just wouldnt buy a computer for a while and it would easily be bypassed by hackers and such anyway. Wouldnt b a big deal.Comment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#6Originally posted by ChalkyDog
HAHAHAHA!!! That is worse than SOPA or CISPA. Blocking porn basically makes the internet obsolete.
Good luck with that.
dummy
he said, "...every computer would have AN EASY TO ENGAGE FILTER..."
Parents could engage it for their children
Other people would not engage itComment -
blackbeSStSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-06-08
- 9398
#7sorry mitt. not gonna happen.
Originally posted by Sam Odomdummy
he said, "...every computer would have AN EASY TO ENGAGE FILTER..."
Parents could engage it for their children
Other people would not engage it
uhh, they already make things like thatComment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#8did NOT happen
that vid is from last election cycle
Comment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#9Originally posted by blackbeSSt
uhh, they already make things like that
of course they do - it would just come from factory/OEM with it and with a 50% mark up
Comment -
ChalkyDogSBR Hall of Famer
- 10-02-11
- 9598
#10Mormons and their crazy ideas. What's next, no condoms?Comment -
SBR_JohnSBR Posting Legend
- 07-12-05
- 16471
#11LOL..so the poster claimed a quote and the quote is not even close to what he said.Originally posted by Sam Odomdummy
he said, "...every computer would have AN EASY TO ENGAGE FILTER..."
Parents could engage it for their children
Other people would not engage it
I guess that was not available in 07 but now days all computers have parental controls so i guess its fuggin Obama's fault.
Comment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#12John , you need one of those Filters on SBR for JJ's videos - I would engage itComment -
nosniboR11SBR Posting Legend
- 09-02-08
- 10042
#13democrats are the scum of the earth, their day is coming, very soonComment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388208
#14I like this guy
It's a great ideaComment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#15no roosters popping up unexpectedlyComment -
BrentCrudeSBR MVP
- 11-16-05
- 4665
#16Where did Glove by his ill fitting jeans to become the common man?My guess is,the farmers co-op.They make him look and walk like Dancing Bear on Captain Kangaroo.I think Glove is packing some John Holmes junk he bought in his local head shop to fill out his crotch gusset.Maybe Glove wears a goalie steel cup to protect the family jewels from whacked out lefties.Hmmm,damn,Glove is a leftie.It's amazing how lefties look like extreme right wingers when the Obama crowd is around.Comment -
BoscoeSBR MVP
- 02-08-10
- 2811
#17Plenty of free web filters already.Comment -
muldoonSBR MVP
- 01-04-10
- 4397
#18Porn is also available via apple-tv, iphones, android phones, kindle tablets. I'd see if he has investments in net nanny software before he forces every company to include it.
The party that rails against government is already shopping for their Tech Porn CzarComment -
King MayanSBR Posting Legend
- 09-22-10
- 21330
#19Another "conservative" telling me what to Do/watch... If i want to see two trannies 69'ing each other, well damn it, its my right to do so. No homo.Comment -
thetrinitySBR Posting Legend
- 01-25-11
- 22444
#20cant stand either of these clowns wont b voting in novemberComment -
DwightShruteSBR Aristocracy
- 01-17-09
- 101270
#21slowly little by little less and less people are being outraged at this government intrusion. They are be desensitized. That's what the government is counting on. Anti gaming legislation, patriot act are just a couple of numerous examples. Both parties should be ashamed. They will continue to do this unless you guys demand they stop. Calls your congressman. Shameful at how so many are just willing to take it up the ying yang with out as much as a beep. The US government isn't afraid of its people.Comment -
byronbbSBR MVP
- 11-13-08
- 3067
#22Agree. The con job is being slowly applied. If you make people more and more afraid of the boogey man then you can take more and more of their rights as they cede them in the name of "being safe". This isn't just a physical safety either, it's financial and protection of "a lifestyle of leisure". If I am to disagree with you anywhere its that phoning anyone is pointless. The US is a fake democracy where the two parties are the same thing run to defend the power elite. When they fly bombers over the Superbowl its A WARNING.Originally posted by DwightShruteslowly little by little less and less people are being outraged at this government intrusion. They are be desensitized. That's what the government is counting on. Anti gaming legislation, patriot act are just a couple of numerous examples. Both parties should be ashamed. They will continue to do this unless you guys demand they stop. Calls your congressman. Shameful at how so many are just willing to take it up the ying yang with out as much as a beep. The US government isn't afraid of its people.Comment -
ttwarrior1BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 06-23-09
- 28479
#23anyone want to start up a new business selling used and old computers????
We could make a killing selling them on porn sites, im serious
Too bad nobody will take me up on the offerComment -
ttwarrior1BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 06-23-09
- 28479
#24muldoon or mulpoop or whatever, most of us have none of those u mentioned
just regular computersComment -
PickWinnerAllDaySBR Posting Legend
- 08-31-11
- 12722
#25lol how could anyone have a problem with a filter that allows parents to block their kids from looking at porn?
Sounds like the OP wants 12-13 year olds to be perverted with porn so that he can seduce them in chat rooms.Comment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#26Originally posted by PickWinnerAllDay
lol how could anyone have a problem with a filter that allows parents to block their kids from looking at porn?
Only fools would -- Plus he said that 5yrs ago , tech has made giant leaps sinceComment -
DwightShruteSBR Aristocracy
- 01-17-09
- 101270
#27I don't think you get it. Sure, YOU should have the option if YOU choose to but a filter if YOU want one to block porn sites from YOUR children. It should be YOUR individual choice.Originally posted by PickWinnerAllDaylol how could anyone have a problem with a filter that allows parents to block their kids from looking at porn?
Sounds like the OP wants 12-13 year olds to be perverted with porn so that he can seduce them in chat rooms.
NOT the GOVERNMENT mandating it.Comment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#28Originally posted by DwightShrute
NOT the government mandating it.
I agree 100% --- but we are waaaayyyyyy past that. For my generation it began with seatbelt lawsComment -
muldoonSBR MVP
- 01-04-10
- 4397
#29Considering both Windows & Mac already come with parental controls (and have for years), this is another "play the crowd" argument.Originally posted by ttfatfuckier1muldoon or mulpoop or whatever, most of us have none of those u mentioned
just regular computers
Let's protect those poor kids using home brew and Linux machines!Comment -
a4u2fearSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-29-10
- 8147
#30come on, there's always filters, but kids will always find a way, I always did.Comment -
PickWinnerAllDaySBR Posting Legend
- 08-31-11
- 12722
#31Well since we are discussing comments from the republican candidate... we should realize that the democratic candidate for president is pressing hard to mandate health insurance, which is a lot more ridiculous than mandating a filter on a computer.Originally posted by DwightShruteI don't think you get it. Sure, YOU should have the option if YOU choose to but a filter if YOU want one to block porn sites from YOUR children. It should be YOUR individual choice.
NOT the GOVERNMENT mandating it.Comment -
DwightShruteSBR Aristocracy
- 01-17-09
- 101270
#32does it have to be either or? Can't they both be wrong? I think so.Originally posted by PickWinnerAllDayWell since we are discussing comments from the republican candidate... we should realize that the democratic candidate for president is pressing hard to mandate health insurance, which is a lot more ridiculous than mandating a filter on a computer.Comment -
PickWinnerAllDaySBR Posting Legend
- 08-31-11
- 12722
#33They can both be wrong, but one is a tiny issue not worth swaying your vote and another is a gigantic issue that is pretty much point A on Obama's docket.Originally posted by DwightShrutedoes it have to be either or? Can't they both be wrong? I think so.Comment -
scottsinsSBR High Roller
- 12-05-11
- 103
#34"party of small government"Comment -
MUHerd37SBR Posting Legend
- 10-23-09
- 12816
#35What's the problem here? All tv's already have this shit. If you don't want the filter, don't activate it. Pretty simple.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
