How big do we go on the Trail Blazers tonight?

[nyplayer33]

another jerk who thinks he can read the line and the side to bet...go color in your colooring book crayons

[Finch Dinero]

what now donkeys? All in clips 2nd half? Lol bunch of dopes!

Lmfao.

[Ace_of_Spades]

Non Pros shouldn't post? Ah says the guy who took Portland

[ridims]

remains to be seen. waiting for the donkeys to finish dumping their accts on the Clippers. morons just don't get it. Yea ok Clipp show by 40

oh man to funny

[ridims]

what now donkeys? All in clips 2nd half? Lol bunch of dopes!

where you at Dudley?

[raydog]

Heat is to easy, SQUARE PLAY, all the SHARPS on PACERS = HEAT CASH

Clippers is to easy, SQUARE PLAY, all the SHARPS on PORTLAND = LAC CASH

I guess I'm a square according to SBR, but I like to look at it as taking advantage of easy money!

heat = nets...we knew what you meant

fwiw, there was nothing "sharp" about betting portland or indiana...

[onacloud]

heat = nets...we knew what you meant

fwiw, there was nothing "sharp" about betting portland or indiana...

I was talking about the Heat vs Pacers game the other night in Indy.

The line was -2 Heat and all the "sharps" were claiming the Pacers were the sharp side and they lost by what 30?

Everyone automatically assumes everything is a trap line which is ridiculous. These sharps needs to stop over thinking some of these games.

[ridims]

the reason these people sense TRAP all the time is because they had lost all the time. now they second guess themselves and continue to make stupid decisions.

[rockyroad]

the owner of this thread is hearing the birds chirping in the backyard shhhhhhhhh...

[Smoke]

Idiot

[Hotdiggity11]

[jjgold]

I thought I was going to lose this game until I saw score this AM

Lucky win

[EmpireMaker]

Dudley = FAIL

[smoke a bowl]

Win or lose last night Dudley is a joke.

[MrXYZ]

lol the OP ranting about the public and squares. Sharps don't just look at the charts on thespread.com & decide to take an underdog because 85% of the public is on the other team. They use their resources to hire statisticians and buy valuable information from their connections, amongst other factors, before placing a bet. Not to mention with the kind of bankrolls the rest of us can only dream of.

If you're going to fade the public you have to pick your spots. Congrats Clips backers & better luck next time anyone on the Blazers. No one in their right mind could claim to have predicted what would happen in this game.

[SpreadSniper]

gonna look awfully silly if the Clips come to play tonight.....

BOL

Well, you were on the "right" side for the first 3 qtrs, too bad it's a 4Q game. Funny part is this clown was counting his 20 bucks before the game was over.

Those blazers jerseys were tight

[CallMeMrOMac]

We can only hope that the car trunk DonkeyDawg is currently stuffed in does not have WiFi.

[flyboy]

bet on the first half and second half. should have left the first half out but oh well better than losing both!!

[pro-style]

People here are just idiotic.

Stop looking at one game and thinking you know it all.

Did you guys know that even if you have a 55% chance to win (which would yield great profits in the long run) you still LOSE 45% OF THE TIME.

All you retards who think that just because you picked a side correctly you know what you are doing are delusional. It's not about the side you pick, it's about the methodology you use to pick them. Any given pick has a good chance to lose, but over the long run a good methodology has a GREAT chance at winning.

Here is some math for you:

If you are 55% to win every spread bet you placed (only some of you can even dream of ever getting a % this high):

Sample Size 10: Still a loser 49% of the time.
Sample Size 25: Still a loser 38% of the time.
Sample Size 50: Still a loser 28% of the time.
Sample Size 100: Still a loser 18% of the time.
Sample Size 200: Still a loser 9% of the time.
Sample Size 400: Still a loser 2% of the time.

[SpreadSniper]

We can only hope that the car trunk DonkeyDawg is currently stuffed in does not have WiFi.

That was good for a chuckle. But if a man wants to dig his own grave don't let him do it with his hands - give him a shovel or in this guys case a backhoe

[CallMeMrOMac]

I expect a "Wow, turns out I lucked out and my browser froze, the bet didn't go through!" post by lunch time.

Then again, I won't guarantee that because I'm not a tool.

[Smoke]

The books love guys like Dudley

[smoke a bowl]

People here are just idiotic.

Stop looking at one game and thinking you know it all.

Did you guys know that even if you have a 55% chance to win (which would yield great profits in the long run) you still LOSE 45% OF THE TIME.

All you retards who think that just because you picked a side correctly you know what you are doing are delusional. It's not about the side you pick, it's about the methodology you use to pick them. Any given pick has a good chance to lose, but over the long run a good methodology has a GREAT chance at winning.

Here is some math for you:

If you are 55% to win every spread bet you placed (only some of you can even dream of ever getting a % this high):

Sample Size 10: Still a loser 49% of the time.
Sample Size 25: Still a loser 38% of the time.
Sample Size 50: Still a loser 28% of the time.
Sample Size 100: Still a loser 18% of the time.
Sample Size 200: Still a loser 9% of the time.
Sample Size 400: Still a loser 2% of the time.

The OP is an idiot because of the way he runs his fukin trap, the game result last night was just a cherry on top.

[pro-style]

The OP is an idiot because of the way he runs his fukin trap, the game result last night was just a cherry on top.

Fair enough. I don't even know why I bother with a lot of this, it just frustrates me to see soo many ignorant posts and people.

[smoke a bowl]

Fair enough. I don't even know why I bother with a lot of this, it just frustrates me to see soo many ignorant posts and people.

Being on these boards for about 7 years, I've learned to take it all with a grain of salt. It provides me some entertainment while battling the daily grind and once in a great while you still run across a useful nugget.

[Robber]

The books love guys like Dudley

[PS3]

How are you DudleyDawson?

[rdkjglsk]

We can only hope that the car trunk DonkeyDawg is currently stuffed in does not have WiFi.

[Smoke]

Dudley check in

We need another lock for tonight

[Kalibongo]

I hope this piece of shit never comes back.

[ridims]

i have a feeling this guy won't ever be back here or in this thread

[pinnerpsk]

[therocket]

I wonder if brah became Dudley. They had the same demeanor and attitude. Brah was much more handsome.

[Big Bear]

how is this thread still going? what do yall have against this guy?

[Kalibongo]

I wonder if brah became Dudley. They had the same demeanor and attitude. Brah was much more handsome.

I think so too.

Both are douchebags.

Hope he doesn't return.