Buckeyes Not Even Close to Covering Big Number . . .

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ritehook
    SBR MVP
    • 08-12-06
    • 2244

    #1
    Buckeyes Not Even Close to Covering Big Number . . .
    . . . but it was a clear case of "look-ahead," with the huge game next week in LA vs Trojans.

    This poor performance vs a mid-pack MAC team (tho an in-state rival) should make USC an even fatter fave. Good, as for me I'm still looking favorably on taking OSU
  • bigboydan
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 08-10-05
    • 55420

    #2
    Your not kidding it was a look a head game. OSU looked half out of it the entire game.
    Comment
    • treece
      SBR Hall of Famer
      • 11-28-07
      • 6298

      #3
      Only reason I took Ohio was because Beanie Wells was out. Thats what really hurt them.
      Comment
      • hoopster42
        Restricted User
        • 02-12-08
        • 6099

        #4
        and now everyone will be on usc next week and the trojans themselves might take osu a little more lightly, perfect situation for tress and company, go in w/everyone doubting you, use it to motivate your team
        Comment
        • moneyplays
          SBR Wise Guy
          • 08-31-07
          • 788

          #5
          LOL, I love how people are using the "look-ahead" excuse. OHIO STATE fvcking sucks, lets face it.
          Comment
          Search
          Collapse
          SBR Contests
          Collapse
          Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
          Collapse
          Working...