Is this a "bad line"?

[exstatman]

5Dimes posted a line between periods on today's NHL game with Pitt leading 2-0 after the first

Was +600
Pitt -900

That is for full game, including OT/SO the following for first 60 min only:

Was +1203
Pitt -2257

Washington to win first 60 at double the full game price makes sense, but having to LAY more than double on Pittsburgh for something more difficult to achieve is bizarre.

[Ninersnut]

Goal.

[k13]

2-2, did you bet it?

[Jaug]

Why would this be a bad line???

[Rich Boy]

The second line is essentially "draw = no bet"

Therefore you would have to pay more juice for that bet. Pit is likely to win, but say Wash comes back and this game goes to OT, you will be sweating your balls off. Draw no bet protects you, only way you lose is if Wash WINS in regulation, very tough to do

Line is correct