Anyone here addicted to betting missmatched college football non conference tune ups

[BrentCrude]

With some of the bigger schools playing evenly matched bigger schools in their first game and losing and then playing non conference patsy schools the next two weeks,does it seem like a good betting opportunity that they will tee off on them and cover any spread the bookies put out?

Does anyone love taking the powerhouse schools playing non conference tune up games no matter how ungodly the spreads are?Tempting sucker bets or a betting strategy from years gone by when good big schools could beat bums by as much as they wanted to in order to please the betting alumni?

[flyingillini]

I am a sucker for the games. I lay the points on those games.

[Richkas]

I'll take the points if the non-conference team also lost.

[Justin7]

Take any dog getting 40+ points. They hit about 58%.

[topcat]

.its so easy to win it should be a sin when the books have team totals out on the power teams, its to the betters advantage.the fans want blood.if the home team is winning by 50.the fans want 60.a smart man once told me to know your coaches.some coaches will run it,while some will lay back.texas tech ran up the score last year on smu.the coach was asked why did he run the score up.the coach told the media they had the chance to stop them.loved it when the head coach of texas tech told the media smu had a chance to stop it.lol