can some one answer me this question (with reason)

[battle4life]

why are the st louis rams +10 vs the seattle seahawks.......or another way saying it why is seahawks -10 vs the rams....how can you calculate this number and determine if it is true or not.......

[Darkside Magick]

the number is off..i calculated it was about 5 points off...game and line is weird...no play for me

[ngates815]

Be honest warrior.


Did you graduate high school?

[battle4life]

yes ngates idk what the true line should be but 10 points seems a little off based on a few factors....the over under is 38 based on that number this game is looking like rams will score no more than 14 points


i got -7 -8 tops tho 10 is high

4 points for home field seattle very good team

3points becuase seattle is better

where do you get the next 3 points.....

im not saying seattle wont cover but if you ran this stimulation 100 times i think the rams would cover more likly than not...

[LT Profits]

The -10 was almost understandable when it looked like Rams were starting third string quarterback that they just signed recently. The better question is why is it still -9.5 with Bradford now probable? Best guess is that Bradford is still gimpy and would probably not even attempt to play if second stringer wasn't out too.

[cant call it]

Seattle at home. They have had an explosive running game lately and seem slightly dangerous.
Sam bradford questionable. All signs point to seattle.

I think play the under or nothing at all.

[Br0nxer]

why are the st louis rams +10 vs the seattle seahawks.......or another way saying it why is seahawks -10 vs the rams....how can you calculate this number and determine if it is true or not.......

Do the world a favor and go take a nap in the garage with the car running and the door down

[paco]

Public perception and image of how Seattle dominated eagles last game.

Seattle great at home

Rams suck, qb not determined.

Marshawn Lynch is running like Jim Brown

[calmeat]

my projections have seattle as 7pt favorites. And with possible 3rd stringer starting just add the rest of the pts .

[veeds1690]

Bradford starting. Lynch against one of the worst run defenses in the NFL, just something to keep in mind.

[stevenash]

the number is off..i calculated it was about 5 points off...game and line is weird...no play for me

Which formula did you use to calculate it?

[Heart]

how can you calculate this number and determine if it is true or not.......

Oh that's real easy. 3 field goals and a half of a safety. Just go back and look at the historical information for safeties and you should be able to figure out the rest. Good luck

[cant call it]

Rams ML

[ehp6737]

Be honest warrior.


Did you graduate high school?

Is it confirmed B4L is "fightingwarrior" A.K.A. "stiffingwarrior"?

If so this would explain so much

[p19101]

I wanted -7 to play ATS, I figured it might be -8 or -8.5, but it came even higher. I took -2.5 on a couple of teasers.

[k13]

-7 with Bradford
-8 with feely
-9 with whoever

true lines

[Mr Handicapable]

I think the Rams show up tonite but they did make Beanie Wells look like Adrian Peterson at his best not too long ago. I'm on the Lynch prop big again Over 100.5 (-130). He cracked the rushing prop vs Philly early 2nd quarter.

[SBRMAN23]

Yea this line seems crazy