The women have been squawking about prize equality for years and now there is a new round of squawking as Wimbledon approaches.
You know what? I'm thinking they should get more scratch than men. I'll tell you why.
They're the better draw. I'm only a peripheral observer - so maybe I'm a bad gauge - but when I look back at tennis for the last 5-10 years, I have a lot more memories about things happening on the women's side than the men's.
To me, men's tennis is like white bread soaked in milk. The women have some characters and storylines.
The argument that men deserve more money because they play more sets is silly to me. It's like saying 10K runners deserve more money than sprinters. If anything, men's matches are too long and the women have it right. Who's got time to watch a 4.5 hour tennis match?
That is all.
You know what? I'm thinking they should get more scratch than men. I'll tell you why.
They're the better draw. I'm only a peripheral observer - so maybe I'm a bad gauge - but when I look back at tennis for the last 5-10 years, I have a lot more memories about things happening on the women's side than the men's.
To me, men's tennis is like white bread soaked in milk. The women have some characters and storylines.
The argument that men deserve more money because they play more sets is silly to me. It's like saying 10K runners deserve more money than sprinters. If anything, men's matches are too long and the women have it right. Who's got time to watch a 4.5 hour tennis match?
That is all.