Don't they mean -14? I'm a broncos fan but I don't see the broncos stopping the chargers. Orton sucks and the chargers don't have a horrible secondary only Tom bradys numbers make them look bad but that's just what he does. Can anyone help me as to why it's only-4 I unerstand no gates and prob no Jackson....But still 34-10 sd.
-
-
I cant tell you why its only -4, however I can tell you if I were to bet on the game I would take Denver.Comment -
Why would u take Denver? Does sd seem like a sucker bet?Comment -
This is the line on the board this week that jumped out at me as being "fishy"
Denver is historically a tough place to play and this is a Rivalry game, where most stats can be thrown out the windowComment -
Let me ask you something, You said you think it should be SD -14 yet the line is -4, what do you think? Again SD could very well cover -4 but on the road and as inconsistent as they can be at times........I would say that Denver should be the right side.
And for what its worth the line is 3.5 now not 4
Comment -
line was -6, now -3.5
makes little sense
but someone knows somethingComment -
Can't bring myself to take Denver here but something stopping me from taking SD as well.......Gotta figure SD wins by 3
Classic "no-play" in this oneComment -
Trap game here. Should come down to the fourth quarter.Comment -
I thought Chargers was bet of the week but they made hard work of it in the end
Comment -
yeah they were my best bet by far and that was because I expected Orton to start. I had $600 on them but as a bronco fan (who hates Orton) I was rooting for Tebow to win this game. Broncos with Tebow in there guys better watch out. Pick him up in fantasy and maybe lay something on Den winning the west gotta get great value on them at this point. ( dont take the winning the west thing seriously and start laughing or making points im just a hardcore Denver fan and im laying some money on it because im biased)Comment
