Brah i need your help. I found this stat that shows that Roy Oswalt is 0-7 lifetime in St Louis. Yes he was 0-5 as a stro but is also 0-2 as a phil.
Should i take the Cards based on this stat?
priskilla22
Restricted User
09-22-11
2289
#2
Brahma and Lakerboy, the two worst posters on the forum.
This is like the Astros vs the Royals. Who do you guys got?
Comment
m4rka
SBR High Roller
05-28-10
158
#3
oswalt gets lit up today.. stl and over for me
Comment
lakerboy
SBR Aristocracy
04-02-09
94379
#4
Originally posted by priskilla22
Brahma and Lakerboy, the two worst posters on the forum.
This is like the Astros vs the Royals. Who do you guys got?
you have been here for a couple of weeks. settle down
Comment
hawley
SBR Posting Legend
05-10-10
14270
#5
LB you will have to wait for Brah to read the ESPN preview to cap this game.
He is busy posting photos of himself looking jacked but he may get onto this afterwards.
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#6
Originally posted by lakerboy
Brah i need your help. I found this stat that shows that Roy Oswalt is 0-7 lifetime in St Louis. Yes he was 0-5 as a stro but is also 0-2 as a phil. Should i take the Cards based on this stat?
coin flip game
Comment
lakerboy
SBR Aristocracy
04-02-09
94379
#7
Originally posted by brahmabull117
coin flip game
who is heads and who is tails?
if it is a coin flip should i take the plus money?
Comment
BettingWizard
SBR Hall of Famer
11-28-09
6522
#8
how is it a coin flip game when past history shows oswalt is 0-7? you need to stay consistent with your capping
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#9
Originally posted by BettingWizard
how is it a coin flip game when past history shows oswalt is 0-7? you need to stay consistent with your capping
I don't just look at 1 stat and make my decision off that
there's just not nearly enough supporting one side or another in this game for me to support it
Comment
frostno98
SBR Hall of Famer
09-11-07
9769
#10
Comment
ngates815
SBR Posting Legend
12-01-09
13845
#11
What if the Phillies were -195 in this game?
Same pitchers/same exact lineup.
Then would the Phils be the play?
Comment
hels
SBR Hall of Famer
04-12-09
8767
#12
Originally posted by ngates815
What if the Phillies were -195 in this game? Same pitchers/same exact lineup. Then would the Phils be the play?
No, that is retard logic. Based on this if the Phillies were -350 they would still be the play? Who the **** nominated this play? This forum keeps getting more and more stupid.
Comment
ngates815
SBR Posting Legend
12-01-09
13845
#13
Originally posted by hels
No, that is retard logic. Based on this if the Phillies were -350 they would still be the play? Who the **** nominated this play? This forum keeps getting more and more stupid.
I don't even know what to say.
Comment
hawley
SBR Posting Legend
05-10-10
14270
#14
Originally posted by hels
No, that is retard logic. Based on this if the Phillies were -350 they would still be the play? Who the **** nominated this play? This forum keeps getting more and more stupid.
This was a stab at Brah. you missed the boat champ, dont worry about it.
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#15
Originally posted by ngates815
What if the Phillies were -195 in this game? Same pitchers/same exact lineup. Then would the Phils be the play?
I don't even like the phillies at - 110 (or whatever the hell the line is), how would I like them at - 195 on the road in a playoff game???
are u retarded??
most of the time during the regular season when I was taking the phils at - 190 or whatever, they were playing some sht team in the middle of a cold streak
Comment
hawley
SBR Posting Legend
05-10-10
14270
#16
Originally posted by brahmabull117
I don't even like the phillies at - 110 (or whatever the hell the line is), how would I like them at - 195 on the road in a playoff game???
are u retarded??
most of the time during the regular season when I was taking the phils at - 190 or whatever, they were playing some sht team in the middle of a cold streak
Like Arizona because Doc never loses at home
Comment
hels
SBR Hall of Famer
04-12-09
8767
#17
Brah is a truckload more entertaining than the majority of posters here and has only respectfully answered questions in this thread. w/e ngates post is still stupid, so the average capper checking in at least won't believe it to be true. I'm checking out of this thread.
Comment
hawley
SBR Posting Legend
05-10-10
14270
#18
Originally posted by hels
Brah is a truckload more entertaining than the majority of posters here and has only respectfully answered questions in this thread. w/e ngates post is still stupid, so the average capper checking in at least won't believe it to be true. I'm checking out of this thread.
Come on Pal if a poster cannot detect the sarcasm in that post they should not be gambling.
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#19
Originally posted by hawley
Like Arizona because Doc never loses at home
you damn well know that I was winning 3 times for every loss during the baseball season. With an avg play of about - 150, that's the equivalent of hitting about 66% betting on even spreads
Comment
SportsPedagogy
SBR MVP
02-13-11
3691
#20
LOL Dramabull
Comment
SportsPedagogy
SBR MVP
02-13-11
3691
#21
I think becase Brahma cant have sex in real life, he comes into threads , makes a bad choice, ***** all his followers over, leaves the thread and never returns.
Comment
JR007
SBR Hall of Famer
02-21-10
5279
#22
Originally posted by lakerboy
Brah i need your help. I found this stat that shows that Roy Oswalt is 0-7 lifetime in St Louis. Yes he was 0-5 as a stro but is also 0-2 as a phil.
Should i take the Cards based on this stat?
BOUT TIME YOU START ASKING FOR BRA'S ADVICE LB..........YOU KNOW HE WILL STEER YOU STRAIGHT