The 15 Rules

[rjt721]

Machine Choice.

[durito]

His baseball rules are sharper than his NFL teaser strategy

[Machine Choice]

Machine Choice.

I changed my online handle for personal reasons, because I didn't think the other one was appropriate for a gambling site.

I cleared this with Willie Bee and told him I was willing to leave SBR if this was a problem. It wasn't. So take your prissy-ass comments and shove them where your plays were last year...in the toilet.

[donjuan]

Did you pay Buddy Bear?

[Machine Choice]

Did you pay Buddy Bear?

DJ, love the gay avatar. Looking forward to your (non)plays this year.

[spongerat]

wow i didn't know machine choice = st andrew. not that it changes anything. GL machine

[donjuan]

I'll take that as a "no". Why are you so defensive?

[Machine Choice]

I'll take that as a "no". Why are you so defensive?

Why are you always so full of bullshit? Instead of just putting up results and your own opinions, you choose to mouth-off to someone who has put alot of effort into this forum.

I've called you out for what you are. You, RJT and Durito are probably the same person. But if not, you're all definitely empty posters who offer nothing.

[donjuan]

Why are you always so full of bullshit?

So when I asked a question specific to this thread and you responded with something completely different I was the one full of bullshit?

I do put up my own opinions. In fact, I contribute to this forum in a far more positive manner than you are likely ever to (see: this thread for more details).

you choose to mouth-off to someone who has put alot of effort into this forum.

Mouth off? I asked a simple question which you failed to respond to and then you attempted to insult me. LOL.

I've called you out for what you are. You, RJT and Durito are probably the same person. But if not, you're all definitely empty posters who offer nothing.

Or the opposite of this. That you are too thick to glean valuable info from us (and others) is your own character flaw not anyone else's.

[Machine Choice]

Or the opposite of this. That you are too thick to glean valuable info from us (and others) is your own character flaw not anyone else's.

LOL!!

I wish you had helped me in CBB this year! I wish you had helped me in baseball last year!

I've somehow managed to do pretty well without your help. Now go shill yourself to some newbies and GTF outta my face!

[donjuan]

I wish you had helped me in CBB this year! I wish you had helped me in baseball last year!

I've somehow managed to do pretty well without your help. Now go shill yourself to some newbies and GTF outta my face!

Um, didn't you "go all-in" saying you were going to quit gambling or become a pro? You must be doing really well. I'll ask again: did you ever pay Buddy Bear for the bet you lost?

And FWIW, I did attempt to help you in baseball last year. Read the thread again.

[Machine Choice]

Um, didn't you "go all-in" saying you were going to quit gambling or become a pro? You must be doing really well. I'll ask again: did you ever pay Buddy Bear for the bet you lost?

And FWIW, I did attempt to help you in baseball last year. Read the thread again.

I've gone all-in numerous times. Sometimes win, sometimes not. As for needing your help, that was sarcasm.

You don't have anything to offer me, champ. Have a good night. Also I would appreciate it if you never addressed me again, Thanks. I'll return the favor. You keep losing, I'll keep winning....we'll both be happy.

[donjuan]

Clueless as ever, I see. It's amazing how some people never learn.

So did you pay Buddy Bear or not? This is not a difficult question (although perhaps it is as you were unable to answer the first 2 times I asked).

Odds on St Andrew Machine answering the question directly:

Yes +200
No -300

[Machine Choice]

Clueless as ever, I see. It's amazing how some people never learn.

So did you pay Buddy Bear or not? This is not a difficult question (although perhaps it is as you were unable to answer the first 2 times I asked).

Odds on St Andrew Machine answering the question directly:

Yes +200
No -300

The bet was cancelled due to mutual dis-interest. I thought I told you not to address me anymore. Now who's clueless? Silly DJ.

[Machine Choice]

The bet was cancelled due to mutual dis-interest. I thought I told you not to address me anymore. Now who's clueless? Silly DJ.

This was the last comment to you DJ. No more wasting my time. You're just not worth it.

[rjt721]

So take your prissy-ass comments and shove them where your plays were last year...in the toilet.

Must be an awfully nice toilet.

You, RJT and Durito are probably the same person. But if not, you're all definitely empty posters who offer nothing.

Not the same person. But durito and donjuan are much sharper gambling minds than me, so I'll take that as a compliment.

Offer nothing? I tried to help YOU in this very thread. Not my fault you can't take constructive criticism.

[Machine Choice]

Not my fault you can't take constructive criticism.

See if you can guess how much I desire or need your "help". What a joke.

[G's pks]

Machine choice... there are those that try to beat down the ones that win .... Do not fall into their trap... They tried to get TPowell yesterday and i think he went 4-1. I posted four picks and they went 3-1. Got nothing but grief...from one retard...

The last 3 weeks I am 14-6 with posted picks, 11-5 with ones I actually bet...one person has said good job... But each time I have a loss the flood gates open... Just keep doing what you do best...capping...


They just do not like to see people win!

[rjt721]

See if you can guess how much I desire or need your "help". What a joke.

Then why start a thread like this in the first place?

[Cheme82]

Hey I have a question for rjt721, Don Juan, and Durito. You guys sound like smart guys/girls. Smart with numbers at least (which is a big part of being a profitable sports bettor). The thing is, portraying intellect online is very easy to do. I am not saying that's what any of you do, but if you are in fact so sharp and so profitable gambling that books cut your limits. Then why don't you do less belittling and post some of your great picks on this forum?

Please don't tell me what's in it for you because that would be a really dumb thing to say. Remember the whole point of this site is to beat the books. Since you are so far ahead on the profitable gambling learning curve then why don't you help us make some coin and post your picks consistently. I mean make a thread and show us what you play daily so we can all tail you and make ourselves rich.

Now if you are indeed so sharp, but are also selfish and are not willing to share your money-making picks. Why do you even come to this site?

Just wondering.

[Machine Choice]

Now if you are indeed so sharp, but are also selfish and are not willing to share your money-making picks. Why do you even come to this site?

Just wondering.

They come to this site probably out of boredom just to stir shit up and see what happens. I doubt if any of them truly makes any real bets that involve money. Actually, I'm almost positive they don't. And please don't give them credit for being "sharp." Sharp implies results. None of them have any.

[rjt721]

Hey I have a question for rjt721, Don Juan, and Durito. You guys sound like smart guys/girls. Smart with numbers at least (which is a big part of being a profitable sports bettor). The thing is, portraying intellect online is very easy to do. I am not saying that's what any of you do, but if you are in fact so sharp and so profitable gambling that books cut your limits. Then why don't you do less belittling and post some of your great picks on this forum?

Please don't tell me what's in it for you because that would be a really dumb thing to say. Remember the whole point of this site is to beat the books. Since you are so far ahead on the profitable gambling learning curve then why don't you help us make some coin and post your picks consistently. I mean make a thread and show us what you play daily so we can all tail you and make ourselves rich.

Now if you are indeed so sharp, but are also selfish and are not willing to share your money-making picks. Why do you even come to this site?

Just wondering.

Not this argument again.

- I'm not great with numbers.
- I've posted plenty of picks in the past, hundreds of them.

[FreeFall]

Not this argument again.

- I'm not great with numbers.
- I've posted plenty of picks in the past, hundreds of them.

Will you be back in the MLB forum this year? I remember comparing my picks with yours last year as you did quite well.

[Cheme82]

Do you have a thread I can go to?

[rjt721]

Here are some plays for you:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-handicapping/72710-saturday.html

Hey, wait a second, who's that guy in posts 6 and 10?

[G's pks]

Those picks are a year old...you guys could not hold Machine choices, or cheme82's jock strap!

Here are some plays for you:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-handicapping/72710-saturday.html

Hey, wait a second, who's that guy in posts 6 and 10?

[Cheme82]

Not this argument again.

- I'm not great with numbers.
- I've posted plenty of picks in the past, hundreds of them.

"This Argument" Is the one indicator that proves wether or not anybody is a winning sports bettor.

Let's say you have a degree in Math, or you are really good at statistics, or you know all about discrete probability distributions. That doesn't make you a winning sports bettor. Since you say it is an honor to be compared with the other two, then where are their picks? And why do you admire them so much? Because if being good at Math is all it takes to gain your admiration then I should add you to my fan list.

A winning record is not an argument sir, it is the only thing that matters in this business of ours.

[G's pks]

They sit in the handicapping forum telling each other how great they are...quite a few more... All the time never posting a pick...but insulting those who do.

[Machine Choice]

Here are some plays for you:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-handicapping/72710-saturday.html

Hey, wait a second, who's that guy in posts 6 and 10?

Yeah, it's amazing what happens when you just post your plays and stop all the trash-talking in OTHER PEOPLE'S THREADS. You might actually get a compliment now and then. But no....you have to turn your bullshit dial up to 10 and come after me.

Funny, I don't recall EVER going into your thread RJT and telling you how you cap or wager. But you have the audacity to do it to me many times. Why? When have I ever asked your opinions? Now STFU. You do your thing, I'll do mine. I don't think that's too difficult for you understand.

[G's pks]

Cheme82, Machine choice you guys are proven winners... I already had a go around with these goofs in the handicapping forum. They like to pat each other on the back and say 2 x 2 =4!

[jordan_gt_99]

I know, all these retards talk a big game but never post any picks. Specially Burrito who claims he is the shit but never backs it up. I challenge this **** or any of you to go head to head againts Machine in MLB or Cheme in NFL, you will need scientific notation for the kind of ass-whooping you will get.

[rjt721]

Will you be back in the MLB forum this year? I remember comparing my picks with yours last year as you did quite well.

Doubt it.

Those picks are a year old...you guys could not hold Machine choices, or cheme82's jock strap!

In case you didn't notice, there haven't been any baseball games this year.

"This Argument" Is the one indicator that proves wether or not anybody is a winning sports bettor.

Let's say you have a degree in Math, or you are really good at statistics, or you know all about discrete probability distributions. That doesn't make you a winning sports bettor. Since you say it is an honor to be compared with the other two, then where are their picks? And why do you admire them so much? Because if being good at Math is all it takes to gain your admiration then I should add you to my fan list.

A winning record is not an argument sir, it is the only thing that matters in this business of ours.

Ganchrow rarely, if ever, posts picks, and he's without doubt the best poster on this site.

Yeah, it's amazing what happens when you just post your plays and stop all the trash-talking in OTHER PEOPLE'S THREADS. You might actually get a compliment now and then. But no....you have to turn your bullshit dial up to 10 and come after me.

Funny, I don't recall EVER going into your thread RJT and telling you how you cap or wager. But you have the audacity to do it to me many times. Why? When have I ever asked your opinions? Now STFU. You do your thing, I'll do mine. I don't think that's too difficult for you understand.

Might want to go back and read this thread again from the beginning. You were the first one to throw an insult my way. Wasn't a particularly good one, but an insult nonetheless.

One again, it comes back to this - YOU started this thread. YOU opened yourself up to criticism by listing a flawed and downright laughable set of rules. When people expressed this to you and tried to offer advice, you wouldn't have any of it.

Good luck this season.

I already had a go around with these goofs in the handicapping forum. They like to pat each other on the back and say 2 x 2 =4!

When? I don't recall ever corresponding with you on the forum. As a matter of fact, I'd never heard of you until reading this very post.

[Machine Choice]

YOU opened yourself up to criticism by listing a flawed and downright laughable set of rules. When people expressed this to you and tried to offer advice, you wouldn't have any of it.

It's so flawed that it has never failed to yield (for me) more than a 200% profit in a season. It's so flawed that it help me win $10K this year in CBB -- every play and wager amount documented for the entire board to see (unlike your plays and "wagers"). It's so flawed that I received more than 50 PMs asking for a description of it in detail.

If this system is flawed, I don't ever want it fixed! As for "advice," never asked for it and never wanted it. But if you want some tutelage one on one from me, send me your email and we'll discuss a fee.

[rjt721]

It's so flawed that it has never failed to yield (for me) more than a 200% profit in a season.

Fantastic. Look, I have no idea whether you're a successful gambler, nor do I care. But if you are, the point is you could be doing even better without these absurd guidelines you adhere to. Nothing over -139? Why -139? So if the Cubs are -142 and you deem the fair market value to be -160, you don't play the Cubs at -142? And only one game at a particular start time? Come on.

It's so flawed that it help me win $10K this year in CBB -- every play and wager amount documented for the entire board to see (unlike your plays and "wagers").

I posted over 600 plays last baseball season on this very forum.

As for "advice," never asked for it and never wanted it.

THEN WHY DID YOU START THIS FUCKING THREAD?

But if you want some tutelage one on one from me, send me your email and we'll discuss a fee.

Don't hold your breath waiting for that email.

[Machine Choice]

THEN WHY DID YOU START THIS FUCKING THREAD?

My capping and betting strategy was specifically asked for in PMs. That's why I posted the thread.

I DID NOT post it to receive feedback on it. That may seem bizarre to you -- that someone doesn't want your almighty advice. But truthfully...I don't.

Sorry if that wounded your ego, and obviously it did because you kept the hammering up even after the thread had drifted into obscurity. You're insecure and weak. And I wish that I could bet against you one on one because I would exploit every weakness and break your wallet in two.