-
-
Love that this serves as a learning opportunity for young and old gamblers alike. If these spreadsheet is valid, and I harbor slight doubts that is, it provides awesome evidence for all these stupid follow or fade debates and suggestions.
In this example, even a monkey, in this case Gold, can come close to the 50% mark. So even though he is a life time loser, you cannot simply fade his picks.
Following would cost you money.
Fading would cost you money.
It is almost as if the 4.54% edge built in to the -110 line helps the books come out on top.
Just like I guarantee 90% of the people on this board couldn't hit 55% over 100 plays, none would hit at 47% or lower in a time frame that would prove profitable.
So please, let's drop the stupid fukkin fade or follow debates and insults and just focus on winning once in a fukkin while.
(I realize that last statement is less than genuine as without people on the other side of my plays, there would be no market place. I feel unfortunate that without losers there would be no winners, but such is life. Lions never look guilty ripping the throat out of their prey.)
GL JJComment -
Good luck jjComment -
Winners coach
Comment -
Good work jjComment
