2011 ncaa rlm

[matelionis]

I am going to try to keep stats this season for NCAA RLM totals. I missed week 1, so if anyone has any stats that would be great. Starting week 2 I will post Friday the games for Saturday.

Mate

[matelionis]

9/10/11
Central Michigan +10.5 (L)
Toledo +18 (W)
Cincinnatti +4
Tulane +12
East Carolina +17
Washington U -5.5

[BeatTheJerk]

We don't care pal.

[AdamL2424]

I care pal keep posting!!

[matelionis]

We don't care pal.

or....you could suck my c ock.

[SportsMushroom]

this should be interesting, always wondered if rlm is a myth or not

[BeatTheJerk]

Hey mate I'll pass on your rooster offering, but this is what basically gonna happen in this thread. I have seen it a number of times, ok it's a f u c k i n g rerun pal. So yeah your gonna track these RLM plays and in about a month your gonna realize these plays are either gonna hit from 45-55% and your gonna just let the thread die out of boredom and no head way. A month or even a whole season is a small and insignificant amount of time to really see wtf is going on, and after you track your full season RLM it don't mean shit. Every year is f u c k i n g different pal. This is a very random system you are going to track with very little edge in my opinion, so yeah go ahead waste your time and our brain cells and track this so called way of betting. GL with it ...........

[BeatTheJerk]

Watch the games and evaluate from there. Then watch the lines .......

[jeffdane]

whats ur criteria man. fiu had a little bit of rlm

[alexn]

not a myth. i made a bunch of money last year and its already 3-1 this year.

[BeatTheJerk]

http://sportsgambling.about.com/od/advancedtheory/a/reverseline.htm

[alexn]

thanks for the link beatthejerk

[BeatTheJerk]

thanks for the link beatthejerk

No problem buddy, yeah its a very fair and accurate assessment on RLM in my opinion.

[matelionis]

No problem buddy, yeah its a very fair and accurate assessment on RLM in my opinion.

So what are you complaining about?? The link to the article you gave says RLM hits at 57%. So wtf? Why not track it for the season?

[BeatTheJerk]

My point was you won't follow through with it.

[matelionis]

Whatever man. Get out of my thread.

[BeatTheJerk]

I'm done.

[Full Time Hobo]

Another RLM thread.

Good luck

[matelionis]

Late addition:
Western Kentucky +9.5

[Monitor-Tan]

Might want to reconsider Toledo, line dropped because of some starters not playing being the reason for the line dropping..

[Ras1112]

Every year we have one of these. I'm not gonna say say anything good or bad about it but to do it right you will need reliable sources and some guidelines. Where from you getting your data and what % in your case will be accepted as RLM? This is very tricky topic , ones RLM others BS
Just as a prediction based on prior experience, as long as you hitting decent numbers there will following , which is good and bad actually, as people will add and argue over and over and thread will get muddy. So, just a friendly advice limit your selection and stick to some basic rules everyone understands.
BOL!

[matelionis]

9/10/11 Central Michigan +10.5 (L) Toledo +18 (W) Cincinnatti +4 (L) Tulane +12 (L) East Carolina (W)+17 Washington U -5.5 (W)

3-3-0

[BeatTheJerk]

My point was you won't follow through with it.

Yeah that pretty much sums up this mindless idea.