Would a Federer VS Nadal exhibition at Wimbledon be allowed to take place soon?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BrentCrude
    SBR MVP
    • 11-16-05
    • 4665

    #1
    Would a Federer VS Nadal exhibition at Wimbledon be allowed to take place soon?
    Tennis is pretty stuffy and ridgid as far as accomodating exhibitions is concerned but if some backer with deep pockets from Dubai or someplace wanted to see a match take place soon even skipping a tour date for the two it would be bigger than the Super Bowl for viewing and gambling.

    Federer deserves a mulligan being that the whole thing was a luck of the draw crap shoot in the dark.Nadal and his daddy have too much to lose because he would lose and it would diminish his Wimbledon title.

    They might not play each other for one long time on grass and by then the window of opportunity is gone for a pay per view tv bonanza payday.


    It would be allowed to take place the day an oil barron shiek,Warren Buffett or Gates puts up 2 billion bucks to let Hooters hold a golf outing allowing a couple Hooters girls to become members at Augusta and Hootie says it's ok.Just to be an ass and turn tradition,standards and ridgid regulations on it's butt, I would get things like this started just to see the snobs in society give in to taking the money over principals.
  • Jetsfan
    SBR Sharp
    • 07-07-08
    • 276

    #2
    Football is my main interest, but this would draw huge dollars. Do you know if theres actually a company interested in financing this thing for ppv?
    Comment
    • fiveteamer
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 04-14-08
      • 10805

      #3
      it was only good to watch because it was the wimbledon final.

      who wants to watch what amounts a friendly match?
      Comment
      • jjgold
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 07-20-05
        • 388179

        #4
        They usually don't try in exibitions
        Comment
        • gordon gekko
          SBR MVP
          • 05-01-08
          • 2842

          #5
          Originally posted by jjgold
          They usually don't try in exibitions
          Comment
          • hoopster42
            Restricted User
            • 02-12-08
            • 6099

            #6
            Originally posted by BrentCrude

            Federer deserves a mulligan being that the whole thing was a luck of the draw crap shoot in the dark.Nadal and his daddy have too much to lose because he would lose and it would diminish his Wimbledon title.
            please explain what you mean by this?

            federer had the easier bracket because his other nemesis djokovic lost early but was on federer's side of the draw.

            and if you think nadal got lucky, did you not watch the 2007 wimbledon final where nadal had numerous chances to break federer's serve and lost in 5 sets?
            Comment
            Search
            Collapse
            SBR Contests
            Collapse
            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
            Collapse
            Working...