He's tough, was in Pride for years....He's never really been beat down.
He's a tough sucker.
But i never mess with that damn chalk.
Comment
SBR Lou
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-02-07
37863
#4
Thanks guys. Where's Punchmaster when ya need him too.
Comment
hackattack
SBR Sharp
06-08-08
326
#5
Rampage wins for fun.
Comment
playa420
SBR Wise Guy
03-09-08
881
#6
rampage is a lock
Comment
SBR Lou
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-02-07
37863
#7
Shameless bump.
More opinions please.
Comment
SlickFazzer
SBR Posting Legend
05-22-08
20209
#8
He should win. Since 01 he's only lost to Rua and Silva in their primes, and one other DQ.
He's a tough sucker.
Small bet at 250 is the way to go.
Comment
EddieJones
SBR Sharp
06-10-08
394
#9
Forrest is getting slaughtered.
Comment
rake922
SBR Posting Legend
12-23-07
11692
#10
Can somebody update this thread if it's been decided
Comment
hackattack
SBR Sharp
06-08-08
326
#11
Pretty even so far...rd 4.
Comment
punchmaster
SBR Sharp
09-29-05
322
#12
Originally posted by crazyl
Thanks guys. Where's Punchmaster when ya need him too.
Punchmaster not a UFC guy, crazyl. Only Boxeo!!
Comment
smallon
SBR High Roller
04-28-07
232
#13
If you don't know the players, don't bet. Rampage had shown his vulnerability in past years and only since he defeated Liddell did people start touting him as a great fighter. Good, yes, hard-hitting, yes, great - no. He gasses easily and is a bit sloppy at times. For the record, I bet $100 on Forrest - thankfully. He has shown himself to be a motivated, tough son-of-a-gun who won't quit so for those who thought Rampage was a lock - get a grip.
Comment
purecarnagge
SBR MVP
10-05-07
4843
#14
Originally posted by Cloak & Dagger
The face of the company is NOT losing tonight
its not like betting on Kimbo Slice
You mean his ugly big as nose that a plastic surgeon needs to go fix?
He lost by 2 pts, he sucked it up. gave up a 10-8 round in the 2nd and didn't really come out blazing after that... He just lolly gagged around.
I saw this fight as a coin flip so I took the dog. It paid dividends.
Comment
punchmaster
SBR Sharp
09-29-05
322
#15
Originally posted by smallon
If you don't know the players, don't bet. Rampage had shown his vulnerability in past years and only since he defeated Liddell did people start touting him as a great fighter. Good, yes, hard-hitting, yes, great - no. He gasses easily and is a bit sloppy at times. For the record, I bet $100 on Forrest - thankfully. He has shown himself to be a motivated, tough son-of-a-gun who won't quit so for those who thought Rampage was a lock - get a grip.
Hey Smallon, did you tell players here before the bout that you bet on Forrest? If so , well done, if not, not good to say you did it after the fact and then give a get a grip message to everyone here. Only reason I'm saying this is I'm pretty sure that in Paq-Diaz boxing discussion, you said it could go either way and wouldn't commit in a thread, and once fight is over said you took Paq inside and had a nice weekend. That's simply bad form and it gets old. I'm not combing over these threads too hard, so if you put out the picks prior, well done because it's tough to see someone c'mon consistently after events and say "for the record", etc.
Cheers
PM
Comment
Cloak & Dagger
SBR MVP
11-15-07
4781
#16
well UFC is the new boxing
taking in all the money on bets and fixing matches
I heard it went to decision
cmon people...use your brain...UFC is the new boxing
FIXED
Comment
flyingillini
SBR Aristocracy
12-06-06
41219
#17
Originally posted by punchmaster
Hey Smallon, did you tell players here before the bout that you bet on Forrest? If so , well done, if not, not good to say you did it after the fact and then give a get a grip message to everyone here. Only reason I'm saying this is I'm pretty sure that in Paq-Diaz boxing discussion, you said it could go either way and wouldn't commit in a thread, and once fight is over said you took Paq inside and had a nice weekend. That's simply bad form and it gets old. I'm not combing over these threads too hard, so if you put out the picks prior, well done because it's tough to see someone c'mon consistently after events and say "for the record", etc.
Cheers
PM
Punchmaster,
Thank you for my new floors! Great picks my man!
המוסד
המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים מיוחדים
Comment
smallon
SBR High Roller
04-28-07
232
#18
Punchmaster - first, i picked Pacquiao and I picked Griffin. If I didn't post it beforehand, so be it but I track all my picks and don't feel the need to make certain I post my picks on the board. I chose Nadal and said so but again, I didn't give thought to posting this on the forum - I just did. If I remember the next time, I will but I stand by what I posted.
Comment
SBR Lou
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-02-07
37863
#19
Great call to those on Griffin, I don't know much about UFC and should stay out of wagering on it.
Comment
smallon
SBR High Roller
04-28-07
232
#20
Originally posted by punchmaster
Hey Smallon, did you tell players here before the bout that you bet on Forrest? If so , well done, if not, not good to say you did it after the fact and then give a get a grip message to everyone here. Only reason I'm saying this is I'm pretty sure that in Paq-Diaz boxing discussion, you said it could go either way and wouldn't commit in a thread, and once fight is over said you took Paq inside and had a nice weekend. That's simply bad form and it gets old. I'm not combing over these threads too hard, so if you put out the picks prior, well done because it's tough to see someone c'mon consistently after events and say "for the record", etc.
Cheers
PM
My quote....
Everybody's on the Rampage bandwagon since he beat up Chuckie. But when he was in Pride he showed some serious flaws, one of which is his conditioning. He seems to have gotten better in the past couple of years but Griffin is no slouch and I'm sure he's going to be in the fight for the duration.
This was my thinking which is why I went with Griffin.
Comment
punchmaster
SBR Sharp
09-29-05
322
#21
Originally posted by smallon
My quote....
Everybody's on the Rampage bandwagon since he beat up Chuckie. But when he was in Pride he showed some serious flaws, one of which is his conditioning. He seems to have gotten better in the past couple of years but Griffin is no slouch and I'm sure he's going to be in the fight for the duration.
This was my thinking which is why I went with Griffin.
Comment
purecarnagge
SBR MVP
10-05-07
4843
#22
Personally, I think Rampage got lucky with the chuck fight. On the show he just seemed like he was out of his element. Griffin trains as hard as anyone whose a legend does... He's durable and scrappy.
It seems like 9 months without fighting was bad for Jackson and he wasn't able to handle it...
So on a fight that I thought was 50/50 I took the dog at great value, plus I wanted him to win.
Comment
hoopster42
Restricted User
02-12-08
6099
#23
Originally posted by smallon
Punchmaster - first, i picked Pacquiao and I picked Griffin. If I didn't post it beforehand, so be it but I track all my picks and don't feel the need to make certain I post my picks on the board. I chose Nadal and said so but again, I didn't give thought to posting this on the forum - I just did. If I remember the next time, I will but I stand by what I posted.
my opinion on the subject is say it before the fight/game/match begins or shut the **** up.
if you don't feel the need to post your picks beforehand, then why do you feel the need to post your bullshit about what people should have bet, after the fukkin fact?
i have known people who do what you do, and I have caught them in lies about betting so many times. it's pretty transparent.
Comment
purecarnagge
SBR MVP
10-05-07
4843
#24
Originally posted by hoopster42
my opinion on the subject is say it before the fight/game/match begins or shut the **** up.
if you don't feel the need to post your picks beforehand, then why do you feel the need to post your bullshit about what people should have bet, after the fukkin fact?
i have known people who do what you do, and I have caught them in lies about betting so many times. it's pretty transparent.
The guy can do w/e he wants. If he posts his picks he posts them. Your not required to post plays on this forum. If he doesn't he doesn't. People will take it at face value... At least most the people on the board won money on the UFC fights overall.
If that isn't enough for you then get the damn pole out your ass and stop being some jaded anal prick.
Comment
smallon
SBR High Roller
04-28-07
232
#25
Originally posted by purecarnagge
The guy can do w/e he wants. If he posts his picks he posts them. Your not required to post plays on this forum. If he doesn't he doesn't. People will take it at face value... At least most the people on the board won money on the UFC fights overall.
If that isn't enough for you then get the damn pole out your ass and stop being some jaded anal prick.
Thank you Purecarnage.
And to Hoopster - fvck off. Worry about yourself. I posted my quote - if that's not enough for you, tough shit.
Comment
bookie
SBR MVP
08-10-05
2112
#26
Originally posted by smallon
For the record, I bet $100 on Forrest -
I'm with those who say your post is out of line. For the record, you did not pick Forrest for the record. I'm not saying you didn't pick him, but charging in after the fact to announce that you did is bad form.
Comment
smallon
SBR High Roller
04-28-07
232
#27
Originally posted by bookie
I'm with those who say your post is out of line. For the record, you did not pick Forrest for the record. I'm not saying you didn't pick him, but charging in after the fact to announce that you did is bad form.
Bookie - oh well, if you don't like it and think it's bad form, tough shit pal.
Comment
Capwizards
SBR Sharp
11-28-07
292
#28
TO be fair - I do not handicap MMA. I am a fan, but certainly not an expert here. That being said, one trend that I have noticed is that taking underdogs seems to be a moneymaker in the UFC. If you take the entire card, and roll on dogs there is decent value. On my website I handicap most sports, but I just don't know enough here. Good luck - and pound those dogs!
Good Luck!
Capwizards Team
Comment
MMAJOE
SBR Sharp
05-08-08
284
#29
Originally posted by Capwizards
TO be fair - I do not handicap MMA. I am a fan, but certainly not an expert here. That being said, one trend that I have noticed is that taking underdogs seems to be a moneymaker in the UFC. If you take the entire card, and roll on dogs there is decent value. On my website I handicap most sports, but I just don't know enough here. Good luck - and pound those dogs!
There have been many upsets in MMA in last few years . Most MMA cards there are a few upsets . Alot of times newer or unkkown fighters that have faught in smaller ORGs are undervalued . Also there are going to be more upset with only 3rnds fights ( alot easier to steal the fight ) also with guys throwing kicks , knees , Punches ,and one wrong move you could get submited . Also Cuts stop fights and there are Refs that stop fights early ( to protect the fighters , but not always the best calls ) . There is money to be made in this sport you cant just best all the favorites like boxing .
Comment
hoopster42
Restricted User
02-12-08
6099
#30
it pretty obvious to see the posters who are just a lot of noise, nothing more, nothing less