Detroit Tigers Tonight...Cmon People

[Cloak & Dagger]

lets get real here

they arent losing the game

[SlickFazzer]

Everyone here is on Det.......you know how that usually works out.

Pass for me.

[Cloak & Dagger]

I dont care who is on what

they could play the game on a sandlot field

they arent losing the game tonight

[pat venditto]

regardless if they lose or not. This game has a high probability of winning. Much higher than the -130 line represents.

[pat venditto]

slick dont matter how many people are on it. baseballs not rigged and books go out of business for getting burried alot. just not a+ books cuz they are so finanically stable that they can take big hits. play the tigers pal

[SlickFazzer]

regardless if they lose or not. This game has a high probability of winning. Much higher than the -130 line represents.

-130 = 56.5% breakeven point.

You are correct. SBR Odds has that it opened at -150, someone was firing on Sea.

Anyhow - get this sombich PV. You videos are good,your like a young Mike Corbin.

[Cloak & Dagger]

DET scored zero runs yesterday...I think they are happy to leave MINN

you think they are scoring no runs tonight??....I dont think so

wanna know what Silvas era against the Tigers is??

27.00

I wish ALL THE LUCK IN THE WORLD to Mariner backers

[pat venditto]

tigers avg is 6th i believe in the bigs @ .273 and thats really low considering they were probably in the .250's until about 3 weeks ago and then started to play like they are capable of. I actually don't like to bet on the tigers unless verlander pitches. imo hes the only one on their staff that has the stuff necessary to win consistenly. robertson/bonderman are avg.. gallaraga has been doin well but nothin to special about him. tigers offense + verlander on the mound against a weak seattle lineup hitting about .255 and a bad pitcher in carlos silva Is AN EDGE FELLOW DEGENERATES.

[LT Profits]

I'm on UNDER 8.5 +103.

If I had to play a side though, I'd be on Seattle. The M's are hot since their manager and GM got fired and Verlander has burned the most money in baseball this year (5-12, -11.17 units).

[pat venditto]

im glad u like the other side that means det's gonna win. thanks pal

[ryanXL977]

id do seattle too
detroit is not good

[Cloak & Dagger]

id do seattle too
detroit is not good

Its a wrap now

[ryanXL977]

how that?
what mlb have you seen me lose

[LT Profits]

I actually don't like to bet on the tigers unless verlander pitches. imo hes the only one on their staff that has the stuff necessary to win consistenly.

Verlander is dead last in the pitcher money line standings. Also, the M's have been much better since the firings, and they're batting .289 the last 10 games.

[ryanXL977]

if you think laying on a bad team, below 500, without its two best hitters, on the road, with no pen and a 6 inning starter, is smart

good luck

[pat venditto]

detroit is not very good actually. whats their weakness? pitching. their pitching is attrocious.

verlander however is not.

verlander + weak seattle lineup = edge
tigers lineup + silvas below avg pitching = edge

tigers win.

[pat venditto]

They have batted .289 against who? Bad inconsistent teams like the padres?

[ryanXL977]

detroit does not have its two best hitters, and sheff aint exactly doing anything
detroit has no pen and verlander is not that good. he is a number 2 or 3 starter at best
why lay on him, on the road
vs a HOT TEAM

[pat venditto]

SEATTLE A HOT TEAM?

[Cloak & Dagger]

Keep betting teams like the Mariners and Nationals because of the price

this is why straight up bettors get crushed "long term"

they are letting the price effect their bets....myself on the other hand....I parlay that -140 with a few other games (regardless of price) and I dont have to risk as much

learn about it

[LT Profits]

You keep saying verlander is hot and the seatte offense is weak, ignoring the facts.

Like I said, I didn't play any side here so a Tiger win wouldn't bother me, but there is no way I would lay odds with them in this spot.

[pat venditto]

im done with this convo. i've got the edge thats all that matters tigers win thank me later.

ryan and lt were the 2 sayin zach duke was gonnabeat the yankees vs joba? you got burried in that 1 so i'll just let the game play out and u can hand your money to the book u degenerates.

[ryanXL977]

Keep betting teams like the Mariners and Nationals because of the price

this is why straight up bettors get crushed "long term"

they are letting the price effect their bets....myself on the other hand....I parlay that -140 with a few other games (regardless of price) and I dont have to risk as much

learn about it

anyone who thinks parlays are the way to win, or laying on the road on a sub 500 team with no pen, wont win in the loing run

[LT Profits]

Keep betting teams like the Mariners and Nationals because of the price

this is why straight up bettors get crushed "long term"

they are letting the price effect their bets....myself on the other hand....I parlay that -140 with a few other games (regardless of price) and I dont have to risk as much

learn about it

WRONG! Pllaying value is the ONLY way to win in the long run. And I am on the Nats +140 tonight.

[pat venditto]

lt you bet on the nationals I dont care if its +190 nationals are never a good bet.

[ryanXL977]

im done with this convo. i've got the edge thats all that matters tigers win thank me later.

ryan and lt were the 2 sayin zach duke was gonnabeat the yankees vs joba? you got burried in that 1 so i'll just let the game play out and u can hand your money to the book u degenerates.

try again
i have never bet zach duke or the pirates all year
so get your head out of your ass
i did bet texas vs joba on tuesday+200
that worked out fine

keep layin on the road though
gl

[pat venditto]

lt it hasnt worked for u pal u've bet 2 million games since april and still have a losing record and are down units.

[WileOut]

Cabrera possibly Out. Ordonez Out. Verlander has been padding his stats lately against cupcake hitting teams.

Wouldn't risk a literal nickel on them.

[ryanXL977]

i didnt bet 30k on the wiz to beat the cavs
did you?
track my mlb this year, i am above 50%
are you

[Cloak & Dagger]

WRONG! Pllaying value is the ONLY way to win in the long run. And I am on the Nats +140 tonight.

did I call it or what?




everyone has their different betting ways....straight up I wouldnt lay -140...EVER...with NO TEAM

if I want to bet - money....ill go to the horse track and bet 1/2 and 2/5 all day....its the SAME THING

bigger risk vs small reward

but using -140 in a parlay with maybe another team to reduce that juice....ya....thats how I roll

but good luck with your SEA and WASH bets....you must be making a killing off them all year long

[LT Profits]

Hey Pat, you want to compare our book balances?

And you keep harping on one losing bet that I only expected to win about 40% of the time anyway, which made it a +EV bet at +160 or so.

[Cloak & Dagger]

lt it hasnt worked for u pal u've bet 2 million games since april and still have a losing record and are down units.

[LT Profits]

Cloak, I did not bet Seattle. They are just who I WOULD bet if I played a side in that game.

[ryanXL977]

detroit is not a good team, no pen and two top hitters out
whats the value
i would rather take a chance with yanks at home vs boston with no pen than lay on detroit on the road
its idiotic to lay on the road , esp based on a pitchers name, and verlander isnt even a good pitcher!

[pat venditto]

great so you're loaded and are wasting a money making oppurtunity by betting the nats? john lannan has fluked his last few starts. hes not great pal nats will not win that game. burn more money see if i care