Wimbledon Future Bombs Worth a Few Sheckles

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LT Profits
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 10-27-06
    • 90963

    #1
    Wimbledon Future Bombs Worth a Few Sheckles
    Nalbandian 70-1
    Gasquet 80-1

    That is all.
  • pavyracer
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 04-12-07
    • 82862

    #2
    Originally posted by LT Profits
    Nalbandian 70-1
    Gasquet 80-1

    That is all.
    I'd bet the Royals to win the World Series before I put any money on these two clowns. Good Luck.
    Comment
    • fiveteamer
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 04-14-08
      • 10805

      #3
      I'd put my money on LT Profits over anything pavyracer mentioned.

      Pavy is good handing out greek basketball totals. not.
      Comment
      • LT Profits
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 10-27-06
        • 90963

        #4
        Look, we all know Federer will win anyway (or do we?).

        I just think those two bombs are both capable of making deep runs, setting up juicy hedge possibilities later on.
        Comment
        • SBR Lou
          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
          • 08-02-07
          • 37863

          #5
          IMO that is wasting $.

          I have a long shot type bet which I'd use for purposes you mentioned, I'll release that before Monday most likely.
          Comment
          • pavyracer
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 04-12-07
            • 82862

            #6
            Originally posted by fiveteamer
            I'd put my money on LT Profits over anything pavyracer mentioned.

            Pavy is good handing out greek basketball totals. not.
            If you want to bet 80 to 1 odds go ahead moron. It's your money, not mine.
            Comment
            • LT Profits
              SBR Aristocracy
              • 10-27-06
              • 90963

              #7
              Pavy,

              Hence, "a few sheckles". I played 1/5 of a unit on each, so very little risk.
              Comment
              • pavyracer
                SBR Aristocracy
                • 04-12-07
                • 82862

                #8
                Originally posted by LT Profits
                Pavy,

                Hence, "a few sheckles". I played 1/5 of a unit on each, so very little risk.
                That is why I said good luck to you LT. You'll need it.
                Comment
                • LT Profits
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 10-27-06
                  • 90963

                  #9
                  My point is no one should be chastized with taking very small shots with 80-1 shots, provided the plays are few and far between.
                  Comment
                  • pavyracer
                    SBR Aristocracy
                    • 04-12-07
                    • 82862

                    #10
                    Originally posted by LT Profits
                    My point is no one should be chastized with taking very small shots with 80-1 shots, provided the plays are few and far between.
                    Good point. I am the opposite. I like playing odds between 5/1 and 12/1 because I don't believe in miracles. I'm an atheist.
                    Comment
                    • SBR Lou
                      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                      • 08-02-07
                      • 37863

                      #11
                      Originally posted by LT Profits
                      My point is no one should be chastized with taking very small shots with 80-1 shots, provided the plays are few and far between.
                      Agree, wouldn't be very advantageous gambling if no bets like that were ever made IMO. Sometimes you have to make a move and manufacture some +$, certainly don't need to actually win the tourney to be able to pay themselves off.
                      Comment
                      • Wheell
                        SBR MVP
                        • 01-11-07
                        • 1380

                        #12
                        For the play to have value either the futures bet has to be positive EV, or the hedging bets have to be positive EV. I wish you best of luck, both bets seem live to me (although I don't think Nalbandian is 100%).
                        Comment
                        • bigboydan
                          SBR Aristocracy
                          • 08-10-05
                          • 55420

                          #13
                          I'm passing on all futures for Wimbledon, however I can't say I blame you one bit for taking some of that action on Gasquet at 80-1. Great potential hedging opportunity if he makes it far enough.
                          Comment
                          Search
                          Collapse
                          SBR Contests
                          Collapse
                          Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                          Collapse
                          Working...