I know it says no systems in the Think Tank but this one can not be frowned upon

[mafioso]

You can go back to 1980 to check this baby out, Its a winner including 2-0 last year to make it a 17-0 system since 1980.

Last years games were bet against the Chargers at Cincy
and Bet against the Packers at Atlanta (Reg Season)

here it is in a nutshell

Bet against any team playing on the road playing a non divisional game
If that same team scored 30 or more the last 2 weeks and allowed 12 or less points in the same two weeks.

thats it plain and simple.

[GunShard]

I'll keep my eye on this.

[LT Profits]

It can be frowned upon because you are not considering the line of the upcoming game.

[That Foreign Guy]

It can be frowned upon because it's blatant data mining.

[Pancho sanza]

It can be frowned upon because it's blatant data mining.

What he said.

[suicidekings]

I know it says no systems but this one can not be frowned upon.

This is exactly what's meant by no systems in the thinktank... A system claiming a 100% win rate that depends on 4 criteria and produced 17 qualifying games in 30 years? Even the guys that are successful using a systems approach would laugh you out of the room with this nonsense.

[Bill Dozer]

It would be one thing if the math of a system or a correlation could be argued for our against.... like factoring in if the line is x when the previous thingy was y. I even like to read the argument on why the Martingale would work. It's good readin for newbie think tankers.

[Extra Innings]

It can be frowned upon because you are not considering the line of the upcoming game.

[mafioso]

I guess I stand corrected, I always felt that anything that stands the test of time and hasnt lost is a thing of value and beauty.

[wiffle]

ban

[topgame85]

17 game sample size will never be considered a large enough sample size to take seriously, plenty here have experienced BJ or roulette where they lost 20 hands straight or black hit 17 times in a row etc. May be something to look at and bet yet math guys won't give it any credibility.

[emoney]

I don't know how books stay in business with guys like this running around.