Gonna Fade Rod's Next 3 Plays...

[iifold]

Good kid and all...

But I would like to direct everyone to post 5 of his "Top 5 Sharp Rankings" Thread as evidence..

Kiss of death...

Looking to go at least 2-1 here...

Good Luck...

[iifold]

Play 1: Rangers

[Rod1010]

Top 6 Sharps Foldi ... 5dimes about to ban me from playing there.. BAD MOVE PAL..

1.Rod

2.Lakerboy
3.Rfr
4.Canuck
5.Zeta
6.Sinner

[Rod1010]

1 question fold..

Still think I bet on Bader?

[ngates815]

1 question fold..

Still think I bet on Bader?

If Bader won in the first round via chokeout, What would your response to the thread of been?

[Rod1010]

If Bader won in the first round via chokeout, What would your response to the thread of been?

Gates..

The line was at -535 for bader .. Im not really a genius if the play wins you know ?

I wouldn't have responded to the thread of course.. I'd be angry on losing ortiz at +375.

Thought it was pretty obvious I had ortiz... The jinx thread was pretty stupid but It gave me a couple laughs when people actually agreed on laying the -535

Tito was in shape for the 1st time but the squares coudnt see that obviously.

[ngates815]

oh




Well then why not just say "1 play today : Tito to win +375"

Don't you want people to pat you on the back for a win like that? That thread didn't do much for your online reputation (oh you don't mind that)

If tito lost no one would give a shit, because he was +375 and it would be considered a risky bet, and nobody would think that you went "huge" on it.


Maybe I just don't understand the people that care about their online "rep"

[iifold]

Straight bet
[928] tex rangers -133

[FishFace5]

Gates.. The line was at -535 for bader .. Im not really a genius if the play wins you know ? I wouldn't have responded to the thread of course.. I'd be angry on losing ortiz at +375. Thought it was pretty obvious I had ortiz... The jinx thread was pretty stupid but It gave me a couple laughs when people actually agreed on laying the -535 Tito was in shape for the 1st time but the squares coudnt see that obviously.

Jeezus.... Really guy????
I remember this thread. I too chuckled at all the support for Bader at (-)500+. But I would have never thought you had Tito and created a "jinx thread".
First of all the "jinx thread" is beyond played out and was overly stupid and misleading to begin with.
I predict I have you on ignore within the next day or so. One more "my body is a temple" or "im so sharp" post from you and that will be it.

[iifold]

Unlike Rodney to be on the obvious square side tonight...

Hardens velocity was down and that's not good when you have 2 pitches..

[The Bet Master]

Gates..

The line was at -535 for bader .. Im not really a genius if the play wins you know ?

I wouldn't have responded to the thread of course.. I'd be angry on losing ortiz at +375.

Thought it was pretty obvious I had ortiz... The jinx thread was pretty stupid but It gave me a couple laughs when people actually agreed on laying the -535

Tito was in shape for the 1st time but the squares coudnt see that obviously.

You are really embarrassed on how you got that pick so wrong. Get over it and admit to it.

[jjgold]

3 out of 6 of those guys are flat broke

What does that tell you?

[FishFace5]

Top 6 Sharps Foldi ... 5dimes about to ban me from playing there.. BAD MOVE PAL.. 1.Rod 2.Lakerboy 3.Rfr 4.Canuck 5.Zeta 6.Sinner

I was just about to correct JJ that he posted in the wrong thread but then I saw this post.
First of all your list sucks.
2nd of all your comment about 5 dimes is a lie unless of course you are lying about your betting habits.
You would have to be on some ridiculous extended heater and betting max limits for them to want to cut you if you're playing one game a day.
I call bulshit.

[Rod1010]

My 2nd Jinx thread : http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...-290-lock.html


I agree its stupid but it worked for me

[Rod1010]

I was just about to correct JJ that he posted in the wrong thread but then I saw this post.
First of all your list sucks.
2nd of all your comment about 5 dimes is a lie unless of course you are lying about your betting habits.
You would have to be on some ridiculous extended heater and betting max limits for them to want to cut you if you're playing one game a day.
I call bulshit.

Dude, I post winners on this site 60-70% of the time.

I see the yankees are at -165 today..

Go jump on that quick

[Rod1010]

Unlike Rodney to be on the obvious square side tonight...

Hardens velocity was down and that's not good when you have 2 pitches..

Foldi...

65% of public on rangers...

Hope your kidding here ?

[Rod1010]

3 out of 6 of those guys are flat broke

What does that tell you?

They dont learn.. thats what it tells me..

They tilt too often and thats not my style..

They can pick winners and we both know it.

[FishFace5]

Dude, I post winners on this site 60-70% of the time. I see the yankees are at -165 today.. Go jump on that quick

Your percentages are obviously exaggerated but I dont dispute you post more winners than losers.
What I was contesting was that you were going to be thrown out at 5 dimes or even limited for that matter. (although limited is obviously more realistic than thrown out)
You've stated multiple times you place one wager a day for 1 unit. This type of style is never going to get you cut or limited at any legitimate book. (unless your 1 unit is huge and I know in your case it is not)

[Rod1010]

Your percentages are obviously exaggerated but I dont dispute you post more winners than losers.
What I was contesting was that you were going to be thrown out at 5 dimes or even limited for that matter. (although limited is obviously more realistic than thrown out)
You've stated multiple times you place one wager a day for 1 unit. This type of style is never going to get you cut or limited at any legitimate book. (unless your 1 unit is huge and I know in your case it is not)

It was a joke obviously..

I think most posters got it.. Your the same guy that still thinks i bet on bader tho so I can see why..

Oh and most posters know this 60% number isnt exaggerated.. Yankees -165. GO.

[rm18]

A's have no power to take advantage of the park bad matchup for them.

[FishFace5]

It was a joke obviously.. I think most posters got it.. Your the same guy that still thinks i bet on bader tho so I can see why.. Oh and most posters know this 60% number isnt exaggerated.. Yankees -165. GO.

A joke? where do you elude to the idea this was a joke?
I'm done wasting time with you. Your immaturity irks me.
2 things for the record before i go. First, you dont post at 60%+. I give you credit for posting plays and picking winners but you dont hit 60%+. (I challenge you to prove me wrong)
2nd, I never posted in that Bader thread. I do remember it though and did not have any idea you meant it to be a "jinx". Also you and many other newbies do the "jinx" incorrectly. The jinx is supposed to be created after the game\match has already started. For example say you made a thread picking the A's over texas. Texas jumps out to a 3-0 lead. This is the time when the jinx thread should be created. You post things like "no way the A's come back" or "A's lose this game by 10" or "texas is a lock"
You cant just start a thread and pick a side and not even use any sarcasm and then come back after the fact and claim "JINX"
carry on though skinny. I suggest you go eat a burger with some fries or something and maybe burn a blunt after. GL to you.

[ngates815]

A joke? where do you elude to the idea this was a joke? I'm done wasting time with you. Your immaturity irks me. 2 things for the record before i go. First, you dont post at 60%+. I give you credit for posting plays and picking winners but you dont hit 60%+. (I challenge you to prove me wrong) 2nd, I never posted in that Bader thread. I do remember it though and did not have any idea you meant it to be a "jinx". Also you and many other newbies do the "jinx" incorrectly. The jinx is supposed to be created after the game\match has already started. For example say you made a thread picking the A's over texas. Texas jumps out to a 3-0 lead. This is the time when the jinx thread should be created. You post things like "no way the A's come back" or "A's lose this game by 10" or "texas is a lock" You cant just start a thread and pick a side and not even use any sarcasm and then come back after the fact and claim "JINX" carry on though skinny. I suggest you go eat a burger with some fries or something and maybe burn a blunt after. GL to you.

While rodney could be on a nice streak now (who knows who he really bets), he has picked some nice winners. But he did create a thread to track all his plays in, and that was less than 50% after about 8 or 10 picks, so he quit that thread and started making single threads for games so people had to do more work to check his "actual" percentages.

good luck tonight rodney, whoever you're on.

[tanner40]

Foldi you will go 2-1

[Rod1010]

While rodney could be on a nice streak now (who knows who he really bets), he has picked some nice winners. But he did create a thread to track all his plays in, and that was less than 50% after about 8 or 10 picks, so he quit that thread and started making single threads for games so people had to do more work to check his "actual" percentages.

good luck tonight rodney, whoever you're on.

50% i remember .. do you remember me being up $700 at the same time? i cant tell you how many winners ive posted here ..

[ngates815]

50% i remember .. do you remember me being up $700 at the same time? i cant tell you how many winners ive posted here ..

You were @ 50% and +7 units only betting 1 unit a game in that thread?

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/974942-rods-nhl-picks-thread.html

[iifold]

Who is Rod on tonight?

[iifold]

[iifold]

We got play #2...

Tigers -1.5

[Rod1010]

Fold.. It's in your best interest not to fade this play pal..

don't want you losing money here.