Shouldnt Matchbook tennis be more than just 1 set...

[robzilla]

for the match to be complete.
i just think its kind of stupid for it to only be 1 set.

[LT Profits]

I have seen 1 set at other books too, although most went to two sets after the Davydenko "fix".

[fingas]

robzilla, that is something that has peculiar rules for every bookie.

here are some of the rules:

1. Ball Served
In the event of a match starting but not being completed, the player progressing to the next round will be deemed the winner.

2. Match Completed
In the event of a match starting but not being completed, all match bets will be void.

3. Set Completed
In the event of a match being awarded to a player before the full number of sets have been played, match bets will stand on the player officialy going through to the next round, provided at least one (1) set has been played.

4. Two Sets Completed
In the event of a match being awarded to a player before the full number of sets have been played, match bets will stand on the player officialy going through to the next round, provided at least two (2) sets have been played.




So, there are 4 ways for them to put their own terms for tennis