Patty buries the forum again

[Avenger]

typical -200 or more favorite winning 2-1 making the only value bet the under for the game. I didn't play this game but I considered the Mets ML and then after consideration I backed off. This game had 2-1 Phillies written all over it.

Why couldn't it be 4-3?

[jjgold]

lame excuses if ur at work why are u on sbr?

classic

I remember a few months back IWIN was talking about being busy on a fukkin stakeout and he posted 14x in those hrs he was on case. Now IWIN is a good guy but not a copy, he cleans fukkin pools

[CanuckG]

i win no money is a clown

[onetrickpony]

classic I remember a few months back IWIN was talking about being busy on a fukkin stakeout and he posted 14x in those hrs he was on case. Now IWIN is a good guy but not a copy, he cleans fukkin pools

burial brought to u by corbin electrics

[Mikail]

Just because a bet loses doesn't mean it wasn't the correct play.

I agree! That's why my filters had the Mets ML as the play. I don't always play something just based on the numbers. You need to take other factors into consideration too.

[ApricotSinner32]

I agree

[VegasInsider]

It was the "sharp" angle

[ApricotSinner32]

Vegasinsider could you please go in to think tank and explain your strategies and can you explain to all of us how halladay -1.5 was a +ev play? I think many on the forum would love to hear your thoughts.

[CanuckG]

Vegas you had Phils -1.5 and Cardinals Over....was that sharp too?

[VegasInsider]

Only problem with your statement Canuck is that I never claimed them to be "sharp". Nor did I ever claim to be some sharp gambler. I make plays that I think will win....that's all.

[VegasInsider]

Vegasinsider could you please go in to think tank and explain your strategies and can you explain to all of us how halladay -1.5 was a +ev play? I think many on the forum would love to hear your thoughts.

Spreadsheet. Net figure is in the GREEN, that's all I care about.

I'm sure my theories are not the consensus of the Think Tank. To be honest with you, I've never even been in the Think Tank portion of SBR before.

[CanuckG]

Of course it's in the green. I could just up my bets to $300 or $500 and keep betting random soccer games so I could get it in the green. Chances of you betting every single game that you claim on your spreadsheet is at 0%

You went 2-9 or something yesterday but keep chasing so you can improve your spreadsheet

[hugh_morris]

Just because a bet loses doesn't mean it wasn't the correct play.

this is absolutely correct and if you think otherwise dont lay any paper down...out..

[ApricotSinner32]

this is absolutely correct and if you think otherwise dont lay any paper down...out..

[obamaismyuncle]

Spreadsheet. Net figure is in the GREEN, that's all I care about.

I'm sure my theories are not the consensus of the Think Tank. To be honest with you, I've never even been in the Think Tank portion of SBR before.

them spreadsheets can easily be altered after the fact. easily.

vendildo, change your avatar..it's disturbing..thanks.

[ApricotSinner32]

them spreadsheets can easily be altered after the fact. easily.

vendildo, change your avatar..it's disturbing..thanks.

2pac was a legend. What the fuk have you done lately?

[tony_come]

too many sharp guys on here

im just a square

[Deuce]

Too many tough guys here.

[rake922]

Too many tough guys here.

Says the baddest SOB on the forum

[jjgold]

Too many tough guys here.

Not you


I wonder if Sinner will ever put it all together??

If he does I am going to squash it

I cannot have it