I am a biased Vancouver fan as that's where I live. BUT, I think the smart money is on the Hawks ML...your thoughts?
-
-
Actually the smart money is on the Canucks. I respect that you didn't immediately go "ZOMG Canucks an underdog? Easy money!" But in this case they are actually still undervalued.Comment -
Canucks win easyComment -
I am on VAN and the overComment -
ya I am hitting the over for sure. I feel that the bhawks are just beat already...I really am feeling Vancouver this year. But I try and think "what is GOING to happen" as opposed to what I think / want to happen...Ya, I can't bet against these guys (or my Red Sox) - thanks guys and GL.Comment -
I'm on Nucks 1P ML, think they grab an opening period lead in this one.Comment -
79% of puckline bets on 5dimes are on Hawks, yet line moving the other way from -270 to -290.
Reduced juice can get -280. While losing a -280 hurts, value may be there. Nucks only lost by > 1 11 out of 84 games this year, -280 about 73%.
Sharp play may be +1.5 -280.Comment -
I think Chicago wins.Comment -
-280 is never a sharp play rookieOriginally posted by terpkeg
do you even watch hockey?
do you realize that a team pulls it's goalie if their losing late in the 3rd period ?
sharp play
Comment -
You can already tell Hawks have this one....sad performance.Comment -
nice jinx canuckg, this game is far from over but i would not be surprised if canucks choked, they have a history of doing thatComment -
True, but that being said, how many empty net goals have you seen in the playoffs so far.. not too many. Has there even been one??Originally posted by boeing power-280 is never a sharp play rookie
do you even watch hockey?
do you realize that a team pulls it's goalie if their losing late in the 3rd period ?
sharp playComment -
I don't understand how you can put -290 and value even in the same sentence..Comment -
In a situation like this in the playoffs, the home team will come out with all guns blazing. Hawks were the right play.Comment -
4 pps to 0 pps in 1st
Comment -
1-0 hawks after first, canucks are now +170, they weathered the storm and they have a good shot at winning this game, +170 is good value
i hope hawks win this game though, no money on this gameComment -
home team is down 2-0 in the series, this is the NHL man, same thing with the rangers today, it happens everytime, the league wants long seriesOriginally posted by iceminers264 pps to 0 pps in 1stComment -
Yaaaaaaaa 2-1!!!!!!!!!!!1Comment -
Wow +170 looking good now..Comment -
2 goals in less than 1min what a joke
Comment -
**** 2-2Comment -
Backed Vancouver live.Comment -
-280 is never sharp???Originally posted by boeing power;9666677[B]-280 is never a sharp play rookie[/b]
do you even watch hockey?
do you realize that a team pulls it's goalie if their losing late in the 3rd period ?
sharp play
That's a comical statement. I can probably find a few events where, if -280 was offered, it would be a good idea to take it.
I have an idea
. Let us have a challenge.
I will pick the events and set a -280 line. I will also take the -280 (the rookie side). You can have the other side at +240 (you know, the side the veteran sports bettor would take). We will see what happens.
What do you think??????
Comment -
I just started watching hockey the other day.Originally posted by boeing power-280 is never a sharp play rookie
do you even watch hockey?
do you realize that a team pulls it's goalie if their losing late in the 3rd period ?
sharp play
But, since you obviously watch hockey, tell me this:
What percentage of games have an empty net goal?
And, in the playoffs, what percentage of games have an empty net goal?
Will be a good piece of information for me to have when I am analyzing the value of a play.Comment -
Hmmmmmm, this should be tough.........Originally posted by D3 Mighty Ducks
How about you give me straight wagers on the Heat, Magic and Bulls at -290 the next two days.Comment -
Blackhawks don't fukk around..Comment -
3-2 now shut it down!!!!!!!!!!!!Comment -
1 more goal pleaseComment -
i was talking NHl rookie and dont whip me, i'm not your bitch, that's your maOriginally posted by terpkeg-280 is never sharp???
That's a comical statement. I can probably find a few events where, if -280 was offered, it would be a good idea to take it.
I have an idea. Let us have a challenge.
I will pick the events and set a -280 line. I will also take the -280 (the rookie side). You can have the other side at +240 (you know, the side the veteran sports bettor would take). We will see what happens.
What do you think??????Comment -
Well that is not what you said tough guy. And I still disagree. Do you want to keep an open ended wager going where I can have -280 on any NHL play?Originally posted by boeing power
We can have a mod hold the cash in paypal. Or, we can bet some points. Maybe that will be more up your alley.
Maybe you really meant that it is never a good idea to take a PL at -280? Or, maybe it is never a good idea to take a PL at -280 in the playoffs? Or, better yet, maybe it is never a good idea to take a PL at -280 on a road team in the playoffs against the defending champs when they are down 0-2?
Was that what you meant?
Based on your comments, you wouldnt know sharp if it stuck you in your a$$.
Comment -
lol chi is bout to be doneeeComment -
I will take any -280 hockey bet from you rookie
You can play any hockey bet -280 or higher from any sportsbook line from sbr odds
And that whip reminds me of me whipping your mom after analComment -
wooooooooooooooooooooo ho/ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo cnanucks $1Comment -
OK, we will work out the details when I find the play. I hope you are not in a rush, I try to be patient.Originally posted by boeing power
And, chances are, my mom wouldnt get with you. But, you'll probably never know.
Not really sure why you find the need to get all chirpy on the internet. Are you embarassed that I called out your obviously stupid comment? Or, do you really just not understand sports wagering?
Go read a book or something.Comment -
-280 on Bulls ML would be a steal.Comment
