DALLAS +4.5 (vs N. Orleans)
I signed up last summer for their free download of their football magazine, so they had my e-addy on their cyberlist.
The freebie was to promote their NBA phone (or email) service. Their first pick of the postseason.
They say in their message that over the past 23 years their late NBA playoff picks have had around 74% winning years (which I think would be 17 out of the 23).
That's a funny way of so stating. Not, say 63% of wins over that time, but the number of + years.
What the plus years showed, unit-wise, verses what the minus years showed also unit-wise, is a more pertinent question.
Also, altho The Gold Sheet is indeed the "granddaddy" of sports betting sheets, when it comes to touting (thier bread and butter, of course) you really can't trust even your own granddaddy. The ol' fukker will double side you in a New York minute.
(If anyone wants their reasoning behind their pick so post within the next five minutes. I ain't got all day here!)
I signed up last summer for their free download of their football magazine, so they had my e-addy on their cyberlist.
The freebie was to promote their NBA phone (or email) service. Their first pick of the postseason.
They say in their message that over the past 23 years their late NBA playoff picks have had around 74% winning years (which I think would be 17 out of the 23).
That's a funny way of so stating. Not, say 63% of wins over that time, but the number of + years.
What the plus years showed, unit-wise, verses what the minus years showed also unit-wise, is a more pertinent question.
Also, altho The Gold Sheet is indeed the "granddaddy" of sports betting sheets, when it comes to touting (thier bread and butter, of course) you really can't trust even your own granddaddy. The ol' fukker will double side you in a New York minute.
(If anyone wants their reasoning behind their pick so post within the next five minutes. I ain't got all day here!)