Angel dust freakazoid busts down your door and Hillary says hunting is ok in her book

mathdotcom · 04-17-08, 09:11 AM

I don't understand you, Brent. You write your posts in English... but nothing registers. Strange skill you have.

jackpot269 · 04-17-08, 09:14 AM

Originally posted by BrentCrude

Did anyone watch the democrat debased,I mean debate last night?I rarely listen to Michael Savage's radio show as much as I used to but the guy sure is a comedian when it comes to exposing democrat frauds.

He was playing the debate live on his show and making play by play comments and I was laughing so hard I was crying.

The few highlights were when some softball question was thrown out to Hillary on gun control and she blurted out that she was in favor of people hunting.Savage went on to inject,Hillary,what if I don't hunt and want a handgun to protect against a mad man on angel dust with the strength of 10 men trying to bust my door down.Why do democrats always spin gun control as them being in favor of hunting when that's not what the second ammendment stands for????

Then the one where Hillary was asked again about her being under machine gun attack a few years back when her and Carrot top-Pippy Long Stockings Chelsea landed in Bosnia was a hoot.She said she was sorry for making a mistake by saying it.A mistake!!!!!How about a bald face lie you pregnant papa sea monkey,Who from Whoville shaped pantsuited liar who really meant that she was sorry she got caught in a lie and not for saying it.

Then you had Obama being asked about all his best friends in his known associates file that were mad bombers,racists and communist revolutionaries etc. and he put his usual spin on it by saying he can't dictate what a friend does.If that was anyone else with a past known associates file like he has,he would have been destroyed before he even got into politics.

Can you believe this is what we have to pick from to vote for?Where do all the genius little children that are so perfect in every which way end up in society where they never become president or elected to high office?We really scrape the bottom of the barrel and never get the cream of the crop when it comes to electing people to high office in this country.

Agreed! and the last 8 years proves it !!!

mathdotcom · 04-17-08, 09:15 AM

You'll never get the cream of the crop running the country. By definition, only scumbags and losers go into politics.

curious · 04-17-08, 09:36 AM

Originally posted by mathdotcom

You'll never get the cream of the crop running the country. By definition, only scumbags and losers go into politics.

People always say this, because the American people do not want to hear straight talk, but I am not so sure. I think someone with a backbone who told it like it is would get support. Imagine if someone with a real backbone did run for President. Someone already well known, so they don't have to sell out to lobbyists for advertising money and the media cannot just ignore them.

And this candidate always spoke his mind, always said exactly what he thinks, and exposed the so-called reporters for the wimps that they are by ridiculing the ignorant questions they ask. And, suppose that this person really debated the other candidates by calling them on the carpet over their lies and hypocrisy.

Let's say that Ted Nugent ran for President. He might not win, but he would be the kind of candidate that I describe above. I think the American people are sick of the mealy mouth, slick talking, lying candidates and would prefer someone who speaks clearly, plainly and honestly.

"Mr. Nugent, what is your plan for ending the Iraq war", asks a snarky reporter. "Well, when all of our enemies in Iraq are dead, there won't be anyone else to kill, and then the war will just kind of end on its own, don't you think"? "And what will you do if the Democrats vote to cut off funding for the war"? "I will do what President Lincoln did when the Maryland delegation to the Senate and House tried to filibuster a war spending bill. He put them in a military prison and told them he would keep them there at his leisure. When they asked for legal representation, he told them they did not need it because they were not under arrest. I will do the same thing".

"Mr. Nugent, what is your plan for dealing with the high cost of gasoline"? "Well, gasonline is high because the cowards in Congress allowed the environmental whackos to put moratoriums on oil exploration and drilling on US territory and a moratorium on nuclear energy, and now they are trying to do the same thing with wind and solar power. So the solution is to lock up these traitors, remove the moratoriums, and start producing energy using US resources and tell the Arab oil shieks to go **** themselves."

"Mr. Nugent, what is your plan for illegal immigration"? "Send all the illegals back home. Prosecute to the fullest extent of the law anyone aiding and abetting illegal immigration. And build a 30 foot tall wall similar to the great wall of China on the US Mexico border and create a new branch of the military called Border Guards, and put 200,000 troops along the wall."

mathdotcom · 04-17-08, 09:44 AM

Ever wonder why there has never been a President like this? It's because if you tell people what you think, then those who disagree with you won't vote for you. You have to make a lot of different people think you share their views.

Politicians free of lobbyist influences? LOL

jackpot269 · 04-17-08, 09:53 AM

When you spent 30+ million of your on money to get a job that pays a million over 4 years (and its not a guarantee that you'll get it) there's "something rattling in the leaves" talk about money management

RageWizard · 04-17-08, 09:58 AM

Originally posted by mathdotcom

Ever wonder why there has never been a President like this? It's because if you tell people what you think, then those who disagree with you won't vote for you. You have to make a lot of different people think you share their views.

Politicians free of lobbyist influences? LOL

Your on the right track with these comments. By the time a person gets powerful enough to be a serious canidate for the Presidency, they are so watered down by their own statements that they are locked in to ideas that just continue to kick the can down the road. This is how big things that the government should fix get more screwed up than it was in the first place. Things like Social Security, medicare, and now the sub-prime lending crisis. So do you know that the U.S. is about to lose its triple A credit rating in the world? The sub-prime mortgage bailout will ensure this and another giant debt ticket for my kids to pay down the road.

curious · 04-17-08, 10:23 AM

Originally posted by RageWizard

Your on the right track with these comments. By the time a person gets powerful enough to be a serious canidate for the Presidency, they are so watered down by their own statements that they are locked in to ideas that just continue to kick the can down the road. This is how big things that the government should fix get more screwed up than it was in the first place. Things like Social Security, medicare, and now the sub-prime lending crisis. So do you know that the U.S. is about to lose its triple A credit rating in the world? The sub-prime mortgage bailout will ensure this and another giant debt ticket for my kids to pay down the road.

I'm hoping that the situation gets so bad that the federal government cannot borrow money at any price. Then the crooks in Congress will have to get serious about a balanced budget.

mathdotcom · 04-17-08, 10:27 AM

I think Ron Paul is a perfect example of this. He doesn't mince words, speaks his mind, and has a *very dedicated support base* because of this. The problem is that support base is very small - it consists of degenerates like us

Okay, you can say he's a bit crazy, and if he held more moderate views but spoke his mind just the same he'd be more successful. Yes, he'd be more successful, but not even close to being a candidate for the presidency.

mathdotcom · 04-17-08, 10:31 AM

Look at the problems all Republican candidates have to face with respect to religion in their party:

McCain - mostly ignores religious questions. Most people suspect he is not very religious, but then he supports anti-gambling legislation. So where does he stand exactly? *Who knows*
Romney - openly comes out as saying we should not be having pre-marital sex. That won the religious zealots but lost the normal conservatives.

Which guy is now the Republican candidate?

curious · 04-19-08, 11:36 AM

Originally posted by mathdotcom

Look at the problems all Republican candidates have to face with respect to religion in their party:

McCain - mostly ignores religious questions. Most people suspect he is not very religious, but then he supports anti-gambling legislation. So where does he stand exactly? *Who knows*
Romney - openly comes out as saying we should not be having pre-marital sex. That won the religious zealots but lost the normal conservatives.

Which guy is now the Republican candidate?

I support anti-gambling legislation and I am not religious. It isn't a religious issue.

Well, I think if a candidate ran on a frothing at the mouth "American First" platform and kept his policy statements to America First issues and speak very clearly, openly, and plainly, he would win in a landslide.

America First platform:
1. Iraq War - kill our enemies until there are none left to kill, then the war will work itself out.

2. Trade - offer every country in the world this deal: We sell our goods to you without interference, you sell yours to us without interference. If you subsidize a product it is banned from export to the US. If you sell us a dangerous product under false labels, that product is banned from export to the US. If you knowingly allow pirated products to be exported to the US all products of that category are banned from export to the US. If you use slave labor to produce a product that product is banned from export to the US. If you don't want to sign that agreement then you can close your embassy and stay the phuck out of our country and you wont trade with us at all.

3. Illegal Immigration - illegal immigrants have 30 days to obtain a national ID card and special work permit and PAY TAXES, but they will NEVER be allowed to become citizens if they get that special work permit. Otherwise, they can go back home and apply to come to the US and get on a track to be a citizen just like everyone else. Anyone who does not comply in 30 days is deported immediately on being discovered.

A wall similar to Hadrian's wall or the great wall of China will be built along the US / Mexican border and staffed by 200,000 special border guards which will be a new branch of the US military. Attempting to cross the border illegally will be an extremely serious offense.

4. Foreign aid - end it immediately

5. UN - get us out immediately

6. NATO - get us out immediately

7. Taxes on foreign corporations - tax foreign corporations on gross revenues. Foreign companies in the US play too many games with what their net revenues actually are by using offshore shell companies to inflate "expenses".

8. H category visas - eliminate them immediately and send all H category **** holders home. Companies using H category visas don't even pretend to try to find qualified Americans.

9. Manufacturing job repatriation - tax foreign manufacturing enterprises of any company importing those goods into the United States. Allow profits from foreign enterprises to be repatriated to the United States tax free. Set up urban manufacturing zones which free manufacturers who repatriate factories to the United States from all the onerous regulations, taxes, etc which make doing business in the United States so uncompetitive in world markets.

10. National defense - adopt an America First Doctrine, if a large scale terrorist attack is made on American citizens, when the perpetrators are caught they will be hunted down and any country which tries to shelter them will be treated as accomplices of the perpetrators. The perpetrators' family and friends will be fair game. If evidence is uncovered to show that a foreign nation was directly involved in the terrorist attack there will be an immediate declaration of war and massive retaliatory strikes on said nation.

11. Energy policy - the massive proven oil reserves within US territory will immediately be developed, the environmental Nazis will be told to shut the phuck up. All viable alternative energy technologies such as battery power, hydrogen, wind, solar, coal liquefaction, tar sands, shale oil, sugar cane ethanol, hydro, geothermal, tidal, etc will be developed to the fullest extent possible. The goal will be to produce 100% of America's energy needs from US resources. There will be a ban on importation of foreign oil developed outside North and South America. A pipeline will be built from the huge gas fields in northern Canada to Chicago (this was proposed but blocked by the environmental Nazis). The nation's number one national security issue and number one priority will be achieving energy independence within four years. Any law or regulation which interferes with this goal will be stricken. The environmental Nazis will not be allowed to file lawsuits to block development of energy resources.

12. Military preparedness - there will be universal military service for all able bodied persons upon attaining their 21st birthday. After completion of the full time service each person will enter into a reserve system and remain in the reserves until their 55th birthday. This applies also to immigrants who are seeking US citizenship and immigrants holding special work permits and the children of such immigrants. The only exception allowed to universal military service is extreme physical disability and mothers who are pregnant or have small children. Married couples will be assigned to the same post so that their family is not broken up.

13. Fiscal policy - budget deficits will be illegal. The federal government will be able to borrow money only in the most dire circumstances. Government borrowing of money from foreigners will be forbidden.

14. Lobbyists - it will be illegal for a politician to receive campaign contributions from anyone except registered voters who are American citizens in the area that the politician runs for office in. These contributions of American citizens will be limited to $1,000 per person. All contributions must be declared publicly, there an be no anonymous contributions. Since the American people own the air waves, television stations and radio stations will be required to run advertising for all qualified candidates. Federal funds will be given to qualified candidates for other advertising and campaign administration. It will be a high felony for a politician to do "favors" in exchange for monetary contributions or promises of large voter blocks from special interest groups which "control" those voter blocks. Seeking such a favor will also be a very serious offense.

mathdotcom · 04-19-08, 11:42 AM

"I support anti-gambling legislation and I am not religious. It isn't a religious issue."

...
1] What are you doing on this forum?
2] WHat's your excuse for supporting retarded legislation?

curious · 04-19-08, 11:45 AM

Originally posted by mathdotcom

"I support anti-gambling legislation and I am not religious. It isn't a religious issue."

...
1] What are you doing on this forum?
2] WHat's your excuse for supporting retarded legislation?

1. Because I want to.
2. It isn't retarded. Most of the offshore books routinely rip off American citizens. I will support anything that makes their life more difficult.

mathdotcom · 04-19-08, 11:52 AM

So the solution is to hurt all the other Americans that aren't having any problems?

You are an outcast. Sortir.