Can you pick 100 winners in a row?

[imgv94]

No matter what the odds are? -10000 MLs shoot even -1000000 ML if something like that exists.. I think it would be a fun challenge, dont you? See if you could pick 100 winners in a row.

All sports:
Tennis,NBA,Golf,Soccer etc.. whatever

You can spread it out weeks,months, Shit even years if you want.. What do you think, could you do it?

[pimike]

No one can

[diogee]

I couldn't...I have a hard enough time picking 2 in a row.

[pokernut9999]

I have picked more in a row wrong than right.

[imgv94]

No one can

even if most of your bets are mortal locks like -3000 MLs?

I think it could definitely be done, if spread out carefully and you made sure you were on the nuts everytime.

[bettilimbroke999]

I mean yea if you pick like -30000 odd teams like when UCLA played Miss. Valley State and you had to lay 30000 to win a 100, you probably would win that 100 times in a row as the odds were bout 250-1 of them winning

[Cee]

I might be able to do 5 in a row....

[MadCapper]

yes

[Arnold]

Why not do 1000 in a row?

[twtb19]

I think you could, if you were discipline and bet, as someone mentioned, UCLA vs Miss Val St or any #1 vs #16 type of games.

Edit: I should mention that I dont think I could, but I think others on this forum could. As in it is possible to do.

[OLGC_Slayer]

I couldnt pick ten in a row.

[BigOrangeTitans]

yes

Secondly, ever head of "survival" pools?
NFL thing where every week you have pick a winner. They win you move in, they lose, then good night. You can only pick the same team one time.

Thats only 17 straight, but you'd be surprised how many can do it. My pool of 70 had 4 people with 20 straight. Had to split 7k 4 ways

[durito]

If -3000 is the fair odds of a game, you'd have less than a 4% chance of hitting 100 in a row.

[BeatTheJerk]

whats the point of this thread ...............

[5 star bomb]

beat the jerk DOT COM

[AgainstAllOdds]

yes

Secondly, ever head of "survival" pools?
NFL thing where every week you have pick a winner. They win you move in, they lose, then good night. You can only pick the same team one time.

Thats only 17 straight, but you'd be surprised how many can do it. My pool of 70 had 4 people with 20 straight. Had to split 7k 4 ways

sounds sweet...SBR should do something like this for NFL!!!

[pokernut9999]

Well I am at 9 in a row on horses today. Just hit my 9th one after a little break.

[goldengoat]

if we are talking baseball, i could probably pick 100 losers in a row

[BeatTheJerk]

wagerline.com try 21 in a row 1st ............. it use to be 100,000 prize but they have it at 10,000 right now .......... its not as easy as u think but these r all ats picks or o/u 's and small fav & dogs for your selections .........

[curious]

No matter what the odds are? -10000 MLs shoot even -1000000 ML if something like that exists.. I think it would be a fun challenge, dont you? See if you could pick 100 winners in a row.

All sports:
Tennis,NBA,Golf,Soccer etc.. whatever

You can spread it out weeks,months, Shit even years if you want.. What do you think, could you do it?

I bet I can pick 100 losers in a row! LOL

[thegreatdiatchi]

100 of anything in a row is next to impossible. the most i picked was 10 i believe when i was on a site that had a contest for picking 21 straight victories. Speaking of which, those douches never sent me my hat. Mo/Cee, what was the name of that site again?

[ipickwinners]

wagerline.com

[pico]

with 1.268x10^30 ghost accounts, i can gurantee you i can pick 100 winners in a row no matter what.

[biggamer3]

no

Anyone who thinks its easy hasnt tried, i know since Doberman did it everyone thinks it easy

[imgv94]

whats the point of this thread ...............

has anyone ever told you that you have ZERO common sense. Seems like everyone but you got the point of the thread.

dude get some common sense, it's not that hard.

[imgv94]

100 of anything in a row is next to impossible. the most i picked was 10 i believe when i was on a site that had a contest for picking 21 straight victories. Speaking of which, those douches never sent me my hat. Mo/Cee, what was the name of that site again?

I'm not talking about -110 lines and spreads. I'm talking about 100 consecutive winners on any kind of wager. I'm sure most of us here could pick at least 20-30 in a row.

[Iwinyourmoney]

It could only be done during NCAA football/basketball. Just take the -2000 favs on the ML.

[fingas]

yes, it's possible, i've made it myself mixing laying horses to lose (if they lose i count it as a winner to me).

[NEP Dynasty]

App St over Mich
Stanford over USC
Pitt over WVU

I bet many would have at least one of these games..

[Iwinyourmoney]

App St over Mich
Stanford over USC
Pitt over WVU

I bet many would have at least one of these games..

Very very true

[imgv94]

App St over Mich
Stanford over USC
Pitt over WVU

I bet many would have at least one of these games..

Extremely true.. those would of killed almost anyone who was trying this out..

I do agree with Iwinmoney, college basketball would be the best sport to try this with..

[Shark79]

I can pick my nose 100 time ... and pull out a winner

[Junkyard Dog]

im lucky if i get 1

[diogee]

It would be a fun challenge to do starting with something like $10 or $20 and putting everything on the ML to see where it goes.

[frankiecheese]

Ats

No matter what the odds are? -10000 MLs shoot even -1000000 ML if something like that exists.. I think it would be a fun challenge, dont you? See if you could pick 100 winners in a row.

All sports:
Tennis,NBA,Golf,Soccer etc.. whatever

You can spread it out weeks,months, Shit even years if you want.. What do you think, could you do it?

My max ATS was 10 in a Row. NBA Playoffs and Finals 2000