Fed Looks Like A Fukkin Machine

**benrama** · 01-25-11, 02:49 AM

I made a play at my sportsbook for the final to *not* be Federer/Nadal, after I saw how Djokovic, Murry and Soderling were playing. I got +188 odds, but right now - don't like my chances. Nadal and Federer live for slams.

**Ace_of_Spades** · 01-25-11, 02:51 AM

They all look like machines. Hard to pick a winner out of the 4.

**JOHON8** · 01-25-11, 02:56 AM

Originally posted by Ace_of_Spades

They all look like machines. Hard to pick a winner out of the 4.

What I was thinking when I read his statement. When does Federer not look like a machine, that's when you can tell if he isn't winning a tournament.

**noober** · 01-25-11, 03:09 AM

and some stupid people were betting heavy on wawrinka. price went from 1.2 to almost 1.3

**jjgold** · 01-25-11, 06:09 AM

Going to be tough final four

These punks like ranked from 5-20 just cannot even win a fukkin set most of the time on these guys

They just know they cannot win and play like it

Shame on them

**Daveyboy** · 01-25-11, 06:58 AM

Cant believe Federer was as high as 1.3 before this match. Why?!?

**kingsr** · 01-25-11, 07:00 AM

Originally posted by Daveyboy

Cant believe Federer was as high as 1.3 before this match. Why?!?

Because people thought Wawrinka had a chance and people jumped at what they called 'value' +300

**Ace_of_Spades** · 01-25-11, 07:14 AM

Originally posted by kingsr

Because people thought Wawrinka had a chance and people jumped at what they called 'value' +300

How many times have we seen that word been thrown around and the bet isn't even close.

**shari91** · 01-25-11, 08:49 AM

Originally posted by Ace_of_Spades

How many times have we seen that word been thrown around and the bet isn't even close.

Not to offend anyone who uses the word but the only 'value' to be found in tennis betting is when you do your research and then do your calculations. If the price you can get is better than the chance your math suggests should be the price, then you should make the bet. If not, you should pass. Even if the odds are tempting. Sure, bet some big dogs for small amounts if you want action only but betting someone because they had a good run and you can get a good price is still a crappy bet if your work doesn't suggest those odds are worth it.

As for Fed, he's not looking invincible. Neither us Nadal. But theychave the experience of dealing with guys trying to claim their thrones and that means a lot. With that being said, I think Murray will have a bit of a fight with Dolgo so you never know.

**jjgold** · 01-25-11, 08:58 AM

Murray is a high level choker, thinks he cannot win big one
DJO is not as bad

Nadal right now killing the ball better than anyone, DoJo second followed by Fed

**moses millsap** · 01-25-11, 09:21 AM

dont see him beating rafa at all

**bruceBRUCEbruce** · 01-25-11, 09:36 AM

I had a small play on wawrinka last night, he was shredded by the best.

**SRBI** · 01-25-11, 10:00 AM

Rafa is a tennis god.

**Glitch** · 01-25-11, 10:08 AM

Originally posted by kingsr

Because people thought Wawrinka had a chance and people jumped at what they called 'value' +300

thats terrible, i had him at +37500 about a month ago. THATs value.

i feel like nadals playing the best out of everyone right now- even tho i think fed is the best in the world.

lotsa quality players still in, wouldnt be surprised if any of those big 4 won it. will be surprised if dolgolopov gets any more wins or take the whole thing.