So, who thinks creditwagering is a hoax!

[frostno98]

After reading what TLD had to say about this, I wondering if this is all a hoax. An elaborate scheme created by the FEDS to moniter what addictive, freeloading degenerate gambler's are willing to do to support their habits. Is it just me, because it's funny how all these people are waiting for payouts at creditwagering, constantly updating who's getting what and when. Jawing back and forth, is your check good, bad, has it cleared yet, have you got your's yet. I mean this is f@cking hilarious especially from them new poster's you see popping up like crazy lately. Creditwagering unknown until BBD accidentally stumble on it, is now every losing gambler's number one sportsbook, because you have to be losing to want to play with monopoly cash right. The worst that can happen is you don't get paid and wasted useful time.

Why is it when there's free money involved everybody's a winner all of a sudden? Why do you need free money to make it easier for you to pick winners If you were to just put $1000 in The Greek or Bet Jam, and play with that same freeloading mentallity you might actually do good in this business and don't have to worry about when your getting paid. And that's all I gotta say about that.

[SBR Lou]

I was paid by them..

I think some people just like reading into things. It's something new, maybe a bit risky even for them to do, but it's a great concept they have and there's a reason that thread has 10k+ views in such a short amount of time.

They claim to have one of the best collection agencies on their side, and I have no doubt they'll be very aggressive in their pursuit of stiffs (as they should be). All the while, they will build a very large, good customer base. Not everybody who bets on games is a dishonest stiff.

[bigboydan]

I don't feel it's a government type sting at all sir, because that could be considering entrapment.

I'm starting to think it might actually be a way for books to find out who's the good risks and who's the bad ones in order to find out what players could be trusted with a credit account. The reason I'm thinking that theory could possibly be the case is. Because processing is becoming extremely hard these days, and I've noticed a lot more of books have requested to their clients to limit their withdraw requests to one per week.

I know this is a complete and total theory on my part, but never the less it's a possibility.

[pokernut9999]

I was paid by them..

I think some people just like reading into things. It's something new, maybe a bit risky even for them to do, but it's a great concept they have and there's a reason that thread has 10k+ views in such a short amount of time.

They claim to have one of the best collection agencies on their side, and I have no doubt they'll be very aggressive in their pursuit of stiffs (as they should be). All the while, they will build a very large, good customer base. Not everybody who bets on games is a dishonest stiff.

What collection agency can do anything ? There are no signed agreements or anything. How can they prove anything or collect anything ? People believe everything they read and hear.

[SBR Lou]

What collection agency can do anything ? There are no signed agreements or anything. How can they prove anything or collect anything ? People believe everything they read and hear.

Well I'm not sure, but I don't know why anyone would care unless they were planning to stiff. The whole "what can they do to me" aspect makes me worry about some of our posters integrity. This same logic can apply to justify stiffing any offshore book, and that's not very honorable or cool. I've never once charge backed from any book, or done anything shady with my funds or to them, and that's the truth. From reading people openly declare they intend to stiff here really is a bit disappointing..

[DacBietViet]

Don't get why the ask for SSN. What would happen if i provided a phony one? Does it really matter

[erybdyducksth]

no kidding i loose respect, Credit wagering paid me. Customer service is good at times. I think the book is crediable to say the least. dont screw over a good thing

[JBC77]

I don't feel it's a government type sting at all sir, because that could be considering entrapment.

I'm starting to think it might actually be a way for books to find out who's the good risks and who's the bad ones in order to find out what players could be trusted with a credit account. The reason I'm thinking that theory could possibly be the case is. Because processing is becoming extremely hard these days, and I've noticed a lot more of books have requested to their clients to limit their withdraw requests to one per week.

I know this is a complete and total theory on my part, but never the less it's a possibility.

You could be right. Would take a bit of capital, seems like an operation like that would have to bleed money for a while...

[Iwinyourmoney]

people get pissed at books when they stiff people... But people think its ok to stiff a book. Sad

[pokernut9999]

I never mentioned anything about stiffing !!! I am saying why do people belive their claims about collections when nothing can be done period !!!! It is a scare tactic , grow up people.

Bottom line is they have no legal means to collect , just like no one has any legal means to collect from any sportsbook.

[jjgold]

So far they are legit

[durito]

If it's the US gov't, why do they take players from all over the world?

Despite what the US gov't thinks, it doesn't actually have the jurisdiction to enforce it's bull shit laws everywhere else.

[pico]

http://creditwagering.com

http://www.ipodprivacy.net

http://www.spanishdrills.com

why are these 3 sites all the same, this looks really fishy to me

[pico]

you can wager on sports and buy ipods and drill some spanish?

[pico]

read this

covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=9&sub=853485&t=0

[bigboydan]

http://creditwagering.com

http://www.ipodprivacy.net

http://www.spanishdrills.com

why are these 3 sites all the same, this looks really fishy to me

Actually their are a total of 12 other websites that redirect you to creditwagering Pico.

[frostno98]

I'm not saying this is a sting to prosecute people, but maybe an operation to collect data from US gamblers, and a monitoring type observation of what people are willing to do to support their gambling habits. That means, seeing who's willing to provide fake or real Identity, who's paying books using a method that they are probably trying to weed out or make it harder to send out with stiffer regulations. That's my theory, for now!

[pico]

Actually their are a total of 12 other websites that redirect you to creditwagering Pico.

doesn't that worry you?

i'd be worried about pinnacle if they have site like swisscashforfree.com

[5 star bomb]

no kidding i loose respect, Credit wagering paid me. Customer service is good at times. I think the book is crediable to say the least. dont screw over a good thing

But you are the one that stiffed cw. So you screwed over a good thing...

[flyingillini]

I don't feel it's a government type sting at all sir, because that could be considering entrapment.

I'm starting to think it might actually be a way for books to find out who's the good risks and who's the bad ones in order to find out what players could be trusted with a credit account. The reason I'm thinking that theory could possibly be the case is. Because processing is becoming extremely hard these days, and I've noticed a lot more of books have requested to their clients to limit their withdraw requests to one per week.

I know this is a complete and total theory on my part, but never the less it's a possibility.

I agree with Dan

[frostno98]

This was my early thoughts of this place for you conspiracy theorist.

[pokernut9999]

I don't feel it's a government type sting at all sir, because that could be considering entrapment.

I'm starting to think it might actually be a way for books to find out who's the good risks and who's the bad ones in order to find out what players could be trusted with a credit account. The reason I'm thinking that theory could possibly be the case is. Because processing is becoming extremely hard these days, and I've noticed a lot more of books have requested to their clients to limit their withdraw requests to one per week.

I know this is a complete and total theory on my part, but never the less it's a possibility.

Guess he changed his mind.

[pavyracer]

Creditwagering will be saved by the Federal Reserve Bank if collapses in the future. It's like the Bear Sterns of online sportbooks.

[Panic]

People need to understand. If the Feds are doing this...its called entrapment.

[pico]

Creditwagering will be saved by the Federal Reserve Bank if collapses in the future. It's like the Bear Sterns of online sportbooks.

[the_orangekat]

People need to understand. If the Feds are doing this...its called entrapment.

Exactly.

[bettilimbroke999]

I've actually sent CW more in than I've cashed out, but I still think they are a great out for the rec. gambler especially during luckbox MLB season when no one should be betting more than 50-100 anyway. They have kept their word and paid out as fast as they said they would when I won and I settled up when I lost, if only all books issued credit maybe we could get bonuses instead of having all the old bonus money go to Western Union fees to get our deposits in and also having your money tied up in a book sucks, makes no sense. Start em out with a small credit line, figure out who the worthless stiffs are, kick them to the curb, and be left with a group of honest gamblers who will pay when they lose, hell if a guy really wants to screw a postup he can charge back anyway.

[SBR_John]

Not a hoax but more like a game of musical chairs and there aint many chairs. Be a lot of guys standing when the music stops.