Both Losers Today Outplayed Winners

[icancount2one]

I had both the dogs yesterday too jj, sometimes your teams come out and play like shite, it's the NFL.

[jbrent95]

Jets and Bears really were the better teams but the quick leads were too hard to overcome

What does that mean in superbowl??

I do not know yet

I always thought that one of the hallmarks of a good team is the ability to strike quick and hold the lead.

[Dark Horse]

Funny how the scoreboard readers can explain it so clearly, and not possibly consider a different outcome.

Big Ben: 0 TD, 2 INT.
Sanchez: 2 TD, 0 INT.

Rodgers: 0 TD, 2 INT.
Cutler: 0 TD, 1 INT.

That's what I mean with circus. And those are the teams, with QB's for a combined 0 TD's and 4 INT's in the Conference finals, going to the Superbowl. lol

[infamousbacardi]

Funny how the scoreboard readers can explain it so clearly, and not possibly consider a different outcome. Big Ben: 0 TD, 2 INT. Sanchez: 2 TD, 0 INT. Rodgers: 0 TD, 2 INT. Cutler: 0 TD, 1 INT. That's what I mean with circus. And those are the teams, with QB's for a combined 0 TD's and 4 INT's in the Conference finals, going to the Superbowl. lol

You are assuming that because Cutler, who only played maybe even less than half of the game and threw 1 INT, played better than Rodgers, who played the entire game and threw 1 actual INT, with the other having bounced off the ankles of the receiver. Not to mention, the other QBs in the game for the Bears threw 2 more INTs....you're saying that because Rodgers threw 2 INTs (sort of) and Cutler (who played less than half the game really) threw 1 INT, that the game was closer than the scoreboard?? (which as I said, the Packers were out-gaining them by more than 200 yards at times before shutting down the O like ignorant coaches)

To try and argue the game could have gone either way because the QB who played half the game threw half as many INTs as the QB who played the entire game....I mean...you're argument is just completely baseless. Just let it go...the Bears aren't nearly as talented as the Packers, and the better team won. If you want to use your time wisely, go start asking questions in the Bears message boards as to why your QB completely gave up on his team. That should be fun!

[stevenash]

Steelers vs Packers WHO EVER outplays the other will WIN

I'm confused now, I thought whoever scored the most points win?
No?

[flocko76]

Pittsburgh would have won by more if their pro bowl center hadn't gotten hurt in the first half.

[INVEGA MAN]

I think the nyj and bears won the 1st half too but you can never go by the scores.

[GOBBluth]

I think the packers game would have been alot more lopsided if Rodgers didnt get drilled by Peppers. Rodgers was just playing it safe after that probably because he was woozy as hell. And the steelers game seemed to be in the bag the whole time

[Centralgrizzles]

So they outplayed the other teams? Yet the Jets were down 24 nothing?? hmm...........

[killawookie]

Im pounding GB-2.5!!! JJ how do I get sbr points pal????

So is all of the public.. and why would you ask that question with 3k+ posts

[ebbearsfb1]

they outplayed them so much that everytime gb and pitt needed a play they made it... winners get it done...

were in for a great super bowl..

[lakerboy]

So is all of the public.. and why would you ask that question with 3k+ posts

public is all over the steelers from the info i have.


jets lost the game when they deferred on the coin toss. BIG MISTAKE.

[officepoolguy]

Pittsburgh ran all over the Jets in the first half so Roth didnt need to pass and the only person Cutler outplayed was the 4th string qb.

[the_situation]

really dude? i hope your kidding...gb and pit are the 2 better teams. the crappy teams (bears/jets) only caught up because they were far behind the other teams let up a bit and played prevent.