Is anyone admitting to being on Chicago tomorrow?

[WvGambler]

I know some guys here will play it based solely on wanting to seem "sharp"

anyone wanting to admit it?

I bought the hook and took Pack -3 @ -135

[jnickell100]

I probably will take Chicago.

[Reload]

I admit that I am sucked in to taking the Bears! Hope Mike Martz has some trick plays lined up.

[WvGambler]

I don't see how the Pack done win by a TD+, but still dont feel comfortable laying the full 3.5. I think its going to be a much better game than some are thinking.

[jnickell100]

I don't see how the Pack done win by a TD+, but still dont feel comfortable laying the full 3.5. I think its going to be a much better game than some are thinking.

Well what makes you think this game will be different from the 1st two they played earlier this year? They beat them once at home alreayd and lost by 3 points when the starters for the bears didnt play the whole game.

[stealthyburrito]

how could anyone ever take chicago, the pack are the lock of the century

[Reload]

[daneault23]

Yea I am. Some on the spread, and a little on the ML

[WvGambler]

Well what makes you think this game will be different from the 1st two they played earlier this year? They beat them once at home alreayd and lost by 3 points when the starters for the bears didnt play the whole game.

The Pack are far more healthy than before, and Starks has the freshest legs in the NFL right now. Bears will at least have to somewhat respect him...even if hes not worthy. Aaron Rodgers is just rolling right now, and the Jay Cutler is Phillip Rivers Light....worthless under the bright lights.

[FuzzyDunlop]

how could anyone ever take chicago, the pack are the lock of the century

So were the 9.5 point Pats last week. I took them yesterday at +172 solely because I'll never see a home team with a wild card bye hosting a 6 seed for a conference championship even close to +140 in my life again.

[d2bets]

I know some guys here will play it based solely on wanting to seem "sharp"

anyone wanting to admit it?

I bought the hook and took Pack -3 @ -135

And you're admitting THAT?

[HiTMaNN]

I took the bears at +4

[WvGambler]

And you're admitting THAT?

Yes, I did.

[BettingGeek]

Chicago Bears is a sharp play
Win or no win doesnt matter
it's a +EV play

[GELATINOUS CUBE]

I'm on the Bears. Jay Cutty can really produce sometimes, and manana will be one of those days where he can show his talents. Chicago has the edge in a few other deparments too.

[WvGambler]

I'm on the Bears. Jay Cutty can really produce sometimes, and manana will be one of those days where he can show his talents. Chicago has the edge in a few other deparments too.

Please tell...

[Chimneyfish]

Jay Cutty can really produce sometimes, and manana will be one of those days where he can show his talents.

Playing against the best passing defense in the league is a chance to shine?

Cutler's passer rating doesn't break 75 tomorrow.

[tanner40]

Well boys I had no opinion on the spread. Then I got a call from my square buddy and his buddy who is also as square as the come. They wanted to get down $275 on the Packers. I normally will place bets for them, but when both of them were so sure (and $275 is a big play for these guys) I decided to take the action myself.

Bears +3.5 it is

[tanner40]

Chicago Bears is a sharp play
Win or no win doesnt matter
it's a +EV play

Exactly. You cannot lay 3.5 on the road in a conference championship game and win 53% of the time.

[stealthyburrito]

So were the 9.5 point Pats last week. I took them yesterday at +172 solely because I'll never see a home team with a wild card bye hosting a 6 seed for a conference championship even close to +140 in my life again.

[Buried_PIRATE]

Took the bears +4.. I'll be thanking bodog for that +.5 later...

[geebert74]

i am on Jay Cutler and the Bears for tomorrow...

[Chimneyfish]

I know some guys here will play it based solely on wanting to seem "sharp"

Looks like you were right.

[kickenchicken]

im on the bears to win straight out... they will knock rodgers all around... cutler will make enough plays without turnovers to give give chicago the win

[WvGambler]

Looks like you were right.

Well, me being on the Packers may be the edge the Bears need.

[MartyMcFly]

Da Bears!

[xetso]

Just got Bears +3.5 and the ML.

Packers defense fails tomorrow..

[bradnowell]

Chicago Bears is a sharp play
Win or no win doesnt matter
it's a +EV play

ya at +170 its hard to pass up

[OmgUrMom]

too funnny

pack are unstoppable, no one can beat them, bears have no chance in hell

i hope this whole site is one massive level for the sake of humanity

[diehardfan]

The Sharps hit Green Bay early when it was at -3. I hope enough people take the Bears to bring it back down to -3.

[BRAVES1985]

forte will be running all day

hester opening kickoff TD

[hankcream]

As a 3.5 pt home dog, how in the F*&$k can't you play the Bears?? Peppers on Rodgers

[pstaff1989]

I will be on Chicago at +4 tomorrow (bodog lines) for about $300-$330, depending on the final juice. My biggest bet thus far but still only a smaller percentage of my BR. good luck everyone

[815Sox]

I am on Bears Spread, but its small. I am a Bears fan and it will be more fun if they win.

[letitburn]

green bay minus whatever