so many suckers fell for that line movement instead of looking at the facts

[The Seer]

The applause wasn't intended for you.

I guess you can't tell sarcasm

[ramones951]

I didn't have either side, but it's easy to call people suckers and say this shit after the game is over! Oregon played like shit and they still could have pulled it out!

Or how about they didn't play like shit, they just finally met their match against a superior defense, an SEC defense...

[HoldEmHook!!]

Why do you keep using this as a reference point? Stanford opened at -1 and was immediately pounded up.

As for this game, Auburn was the better team -- but don't act like this was a slam dunk. Despite that and Oregon playing like total dogshit, it still came down to the final play.

If Kelly kicks the stupid fvcking field goal instead of going for it from the 1, this thread may not have existed.

And if Cam isnt hurt (which he went for x-rays after post game interviews) Auburn would have Hammered Ore.

[Prop Bet Master]

prop master, turn read master for a sec and read post #22. thanks

I read the original post. I didn't see you mention anything about the line movement or that all the suckers are on Oregon. Oregon could have easily won that game and if they did we wouldn't hear shit from you! So shut the **** up, asshole!

[The Seer]

I read the original post. I didn't see you mention anything about the line movement or that all the suckers are on Oregon. Oregon could have easily won that game and if they did we wouldn't hear shit from you! So shut the **** up, asshole!

I just stated facts why Auburn was the better team which was easily noticeable on the field. You are in denial if you think it was as close as the final score. Have a nice day!

[HoldEmHook!!]

I guess you can't tell sarcasm

Seer, stop wasting your time trying to explain things to people who have nothing better to do than complain just to complain. all these idiots are just shoveling smoke......

[tony_come]

Ordering some garlic fried rice...

[mlb]

the ORE QB had to have played his worst game.

agreed ... he was awful

[davus4]

Yup, Under 74 was looking awesome pregame. I was even able to invest further into Under 60 sometime during the 2nd quarter, and it paid off
woohoo!

[melia26]

Public lost and books won BIG!

Work in a book, the big $ was on Auburn and the under.

[paco]

NoCoin. Not at u or any line experts, im justvsaying the game is played ON the field and NOT in a office.

[60 outside]

Had me on the edge of my seat till the final whistle. One heck of a game, just the way a championship game should be. Good job, both teams!

[Jonah]

I didn't have either side, but it's easy to call people suckers and say this shit after the game is over! Oregon played like shit and they still could have pulled it out!

Seer can't see this. I too mentioned in other threads weeks ago that you don't want to go against a beast on the D line in a championship game where he has millions riding on it. Plus having a man and QB, while the other team had a boy.
Those are things you want to have on your side when dealing with a 6 week layoff. A 6 week layoff. Pretty offenses go to die when you have a SIX WEEK LAYOFF. Oregon played terrible, Auburn played great, and barely won. Draw your own conclusions.

[GELATINOUS CUBE]

which line movement are you talking of??

[Jonah]

Had me on the edge of my seat till the final whistle. One heck of a game, just the way a championship game should be. Good job, both teams!

Game was terrible. Boring, anti-climactic with that fluke run at the end, players slipping all over the place. Teams only a shell of their former selves due to I don't know - not playing a game for like 50 days.

[paco]

Work in a book, the big $ was on Auburn and the under.

Melissa ,

[The Seer]

Oregon played terrible, Auburn played great, and barely won. Draw your own conclusions.

the conclusion is that Oregon had no answer for being inferior in the trenches. They played like "shit" because that is how Aub made them play. Anyone with a clue could see this including Saban, Herbstreit, and Meyer who acknowledged it after the game.

[blix177]

w/e man I hope u lose ur shirt off.

[mitote]

I had Auburn -1.5 and consider myself lucky to get the W!

[yurnero]

i was on the right side placing aub -3 and aub ML -160 about a month or so ago. today, before the game started i placed another bet for aub ML at -110. with that said, this game was still VERY close. if the ducks dont get the 2 pt conversion to tie, many aub backers at -2.5 and -3 would of lost.

[sweethook]

sec 5 in a row

[jbrent95]

I'm eating crow with my 2H over 37 wager.

[katstale]

Things to get from this game. Worst field/turf I have seen for a big game. Auburn D was so superior that they survived poor performance by Cam. If they played 10 times auburn wins 8.

Finally, everyone who considers themselves more than a point collector, needs to go back and look at the predictions made by some of the "so called" experts at this forum. They had no clue. Best to fade most of the "names" on this forum.

To SBRJohn: Thanks once again for giving away points. It was a kind gesture which you really didn't have to do!! Look forward to thanking you in person soon.

[wrongturn]

But I use Bodog. So I sit at the edge without falling into it.

[ouman101]

Seer, you could be the biggest SEC homer on this board. The total yards were Oregon: 451 Auburn: 512 The game was a coin flip and it landed on your side this time. I played the under so I didn't care which side won, but to say "Auburn's defense is so much bigger, faster, blah, blah blah...". Dude, they gave up pretty much identical stats.

I knew someone would make this thread, but I figured it would be someone who knows nothing about sports. There were a dozen plays for each team that could have turned this game one way or the other.

[big0mar]

Not sure how you could say anyone who took ORE was a sucker. It was clear what the books were trying to do here.

[nj1035]

Blah blah blah....game could have gone either way.

Get over yourself.

Gotta love the big talker who covers by like a point and talks about how superior his team is and everyone who didn't pick them was an idiot.

[aca]

Congrats, Aub backers!

[AlphaOmega]

This game was a coin flip it could have gone either way. If this if that fukk it the game is over gloating about your win make you sound like a scum bag.

[Jonah]

the conclusion is that Oregon had no answer for being inferior in the trenches. They played like "shit" because that is how Aub made them play. Anyone with a clue could see this including Saban, Herbstreit, and Meyer who acknowledged it after the game.

Oregon QB play had nothing to do with it? Commentators will always talk about why winning teams won, that is what they do. You won't ever hear a deep analysis of why the losing team could have won. Get a clue.

Case in point in baseball, if a pitcher gives up 3 or 4 in baseball over 6 and a third and they when, you will see all the highlights and breakdown of a how he was key to the win, opposite if he loses. He pitched bad. In short, post-game analysis is broken down to vindicate the winner, as it should. For Them.

[pokernut9999]

With 2 1/2 minutes left the score was tied and the yardage was almost the same.

How can anyone say one team dominated the other , the team that had the ball last won.

Game was sloppy as they usually are with a 5 week layoff and I said in an earlier thread it is only one game and to be careful.

[The Seer]

Get a clue.

lol, it's what I do for a living. I have played or coached football for over 30 yrs. When I'm watching a game I can tell what each team is trying to do. Auburn's focus was taking away LaMicheal James and the run which is what they accomplished by holding him to 49 yds. They forced the QB to try and beat them by throwing the ball. He threw for alot of yds but couldn't get the job done. The average yds per rush was Oreg 2.3 and Aub 5.1. That's a dominating difference. Aub had 254 yds rushing and Oregon failed to do what they wanted. Oregon tried to force Cam to do the same. They did a decent job vs Cam but he did bulldoze them for some crucial 3rd downs. If you would have watched the line play instead of following the ball like 99% of most people you could see the difference. Auburn almost blew it by some conservative playcalling in the second half & trying to coast with a lead while Oregon stayed aggressive. I doubt you would know the difference between a 5 technique and a 3 or the B gap and the C or what the weakside linebacker's responsibilities are on a strong side run and you are telling me to get a clue, lol. This thread was to show from past experience that it's not wise to just bet games solely on line movement & ignoring all other factors & nothing more. I got beat before doing the same. It was not to antagonize anyone.

[KKoz9]

This...

Blah blah blah....game could have gone either way.

Get over yourself.

Gotta love the big talker who covers by like a point and talks about how superior his team is and everyone who didn't pick them was an idiot.

And especially this...

With 2 1/2 minutes left the score was tied and the yardage was almost the same.

How can anyone say one team dominated the other , the team that had the ball last won.

Game was sloppy as they usually are with a 5 week layoff and I said in an earlier thread it is only one game and to be careful.

[The Seer]

This... And especially this...

yds per rush shows who dominated the line of scrimmage. It's that simple. Oregon had some big plays that kept them in the game.

[big0mar]

lol, it's what I do for a living. I have played or coached football for over 30 yrs. When I'm watching a game I can tell what each team is trying to do. Auburn's focus was taking away LaMicheal James and the run which is what they accomplished by holding him to 49 yds. They forced the QB to try and beat them by throwing the ball. He threw for alot of yds but couldn't get the job done. The average yds per rush was Oreg 2.3 and Aub 5.1. That's a dominating difference. Aub had 254 yds rushing and Oregon failed to do what they wanted. Oregon tried to force Cam to do the same. They did a decent job vs Cam but he did bulldoze them for some crucial 3rd downs. If you would have watched the line play instead of following the ball like 99% of most people you could see the difference. Auburn almost blew it by some conservative playcalling in the second half & trying to coast with a lead while Oregon stayed aggressive. I doubt you would know the difference between a 5 technique and a 3 or the B gap and the C or what the weakside linebacker's responsibilities are on a strong side run and you are telling me to get a clue, lol. This thread was to show from past experience that it's not wise to just bet games solely on line movement & ignoring all other factors & nothing more. I got beat before doing the same. It was not to antagonize anyone.

Yeah, but you're also underestimating what Chip Kelly brings to the table.

No shit Auburn is the more talented team. Oregon isn't even the most talented team in their conference. Theres a reason why Oregon has to run a gimmicky offense.