If I Go Ahead And Bump Every Thread With The Word "WagerWeb" In It Daily...

[BigBollocks]

If I go ahead and bump every thread with the word "WagerWeb" in it (good and bad) daily, will WWSucks agree to leave the forum? If not, will the mods go ahead and finally give him the well deserved heave ho? Literally EVERY thread and post of his has been about his shot taking attempt, and it clutters up the forums on a continual basis. I think what WW has done and is doing to the players labeled "sharp" is chintzy as hell as well for the record, but it has nothing to do with this cheating cancer. If there's a way to label them "double losers," I think 99% of us would agree on that.

So how about it? If I just bump every WW thread daily, but without the hysterics and antics of WWSucks, can we agree on having reached middle ground? When I'm out of town we can nominate someone else to do it. Hopefully then everyone can still be reminded daily that WWSucks is a con artist and WW doesn't like sharp players, but perhaps then we can all move on at a more abrupt pace. Let me know what you think...

[SBR Lou]

Shot takers, welshers, and admitted scammers are welcomed here with open arms. That's the liberal, open doorsy policy SBR John instilled, and I don't anticipate that changing anytime soon. Unfortunately banishments are reserved for the most heinous of offenders, (aka those that piss off management- Bateman?), and ghosts.

[BigBollocks]

Shot takers, welshers, and admitted scammers are welcomed here with open arms. That's the liberal, open doorsy policy SBR John instilled, and I don't anticipate that changing anytime soon. Unfortunately banishments are reserved for the most heinous of offenders, (aka those that piss off management- Bateman?), and ghosts.

Alas, you appear to be right Crazyl. I hate to see someone who is a professional shot taker be allowed to take over the boards on a daily basis, but if that's what SBR wants for whatever reason, that's certainly what they've gotten. If every other board boots him after laughing him off, and SBR does nothing, it only naturally sends an obvious message. It's their board, and they can of course do as they please.

I'll give him credit where it's due, he's damn good at finding loopholes, and has made hundreds of thousands working tirelessly to find loopholes where possible. His greed got him picked off in this instance, however, and we get to hear his incessant whining as a result (a typical cheater trademark). Oh well, on to more totals capping in an attempt to cashout the more "boring" way