Hammer the Colts now you Square fukks

[statnerds]

11/28/2010 @ 09:00 pm nfl[9238] colts "live" +8.5-110

[statnerds]

Actually, don't hammer it just yet. Go half unit now and hope Colts don't score here. Another score by SD, or even a stop here may push it to DDs.

And in full disclosure, I have SD +2.5/+110

[statnerds]

Shoot, only went to 9.5. Have to hope for a Bolts score here.

[yisman]

[statnerds]

Football NFL Live Bet
Wager Type:Straight Bet
Colts LIVE
Spread +15½ -110 for Game

[dwaechte]

Sharp bet.

[The Seer]

chasing is not good

[dfberger23]

Fading statnerds has proved to be a profitable angle the last week or two.

[crustyme]

lol

[KingKolzig]

Football NFL Live Bet
Wager Type:Straight Bet
Colts LIVE
Spread +15½ -110 for Game

another chasing loser. what an angry joke this guy is

[phillybadboy]

this guy is terrible

[riggs]

The large majority of the public was on Indy, so how the f*** was SD the square play?

[wtf]

i am THERE!

[csm506]

This guy should hide in the wilderness with his dumb ass picks

[csm506]

If he played all night on the Colts and he is waiting on a Peyton comeback, someone should tell him 2010 is over for the Colts.

[obamaismyuncle]

live betting is playing with dynamite..sooner or later it will blow you up

[Double Bogey]

Lol love this guys betting style

[Poppa Catfish]

[ProfaneReality]

this guy is solid

[shock11]

thanks for the sharp bets there

[mitote]

Don't run him off! He is money in the bank if you fade him!

[peppy1996]

San Diego took your advice.

[Rollins08]

One of the worst posts I have ever seen. Why not stay off the computer? You should stop gambling forever.

[Duff85]

Don't run him off! He is money in the bank if you fade him!

This one is always a misconception too... if the dude isn't skilled enough to pick 53% winners, chances are he can't pick 53% losers either. House is going to beat you whether you tail or fade him long term.

[statnerds]

The large majority of the public was on Indy, so how the f*** was SD the square play?

Ummm, can anyone on this fukkin site read? Why do you think I put the Full Disclosure statement there?

I had SD +2.5 and +110 for the game.

Put a half unit on Indy at +8.5 and another half unit at 15.5.

So if I am sitting on winning tickets for +2.5 and +110, and the score is 33-14, and I take Colts +15.5, I am getting greedy. I would do it again in the same situation.

That late in the game, SD, unless they got a turnover on the 30, which they did, aren't going to score again, or even try to score. So they take the FG and make it a 22 point game.

You guys don't get the fact that the second bet at +15.5 is basically betting Peyton Manning can lead a TD drive during garbage time at home. And if you want to know, Indy scores next was around -165 at the end, but I had it for -110. Do you fukkin get it yet? Took a fumble and then an INT in the endzone to lose that bet. And the initial bet at +8.5 was lost because of turnovers. But I forgot, you guys are so good you can handicap turnovers.

Things that make me laugh. A thread that I had a winning night with, this one, has more views than the combined views of the 4 threads I posted with a combined record of 27-18?

You guys are fukkin hilarious. I get it. You ignore the data that proves you wrong, toss off on your keyboards for that ones that support it, all the while telling people global warming is going to kill us all. Keep bumping my losing threads and avoiding the winning ones. fukkin losers. Laughing all the way to the bank.

[Ninersnut]

Hmmmm at the end of the day you just need a winning ticket.

[dwaechte]

Ummm, can anyone on this fukkin site read? Why do you think I put the Full Disclosure statement there?

I had SD +2.5 and +110 for the game.

Put a half unit on Indy at +8.5 and another half unit at 15.5.

So if I am sitting on winning tickets for +2.5 and +110, and the score is 33-14, and I take Colts +15.5, I am getting greedy. I would do it again in the same situation.

That late in the game, SD, unless they got a turnover on the 30, which they did, aren't going to score again, or even try to score. So they take the FG and make it a 22 point game.

You guys don't get the fact that the second bet at +15.5 is basically betting Peyton Manning can lead a TD drive during garbage time at home. And if you want to know, Indy scores next was around -165 at the end, but I had it for -110. Do you fukkin get it yet? Took a fumble and then an INT in the endzone to lose that bet. And the initial bet at +8.5 was lost because of turnovers. But I forgot, you guys are so good you can handicap turnovers.

Things that make me laugh. A thread that I had a winning night with, this one, has more views than the combined views of the 4 threads I posted with a combined record of 27-18?

You guys are fukkin hilarious. I get it. You ignore the data that proves you wrong, toss off on your keyboards for that ones that support it, all the while telling people global warming is going to kill us all. Keep bumping my losing threads and avoiding the winning ones. fukkin losers. Laughing all the way to the bank.

Simmer down buddy. Act like a cocky punk ass kid and this is the response you get when you're wrong. Learn to live with it or shut the fukk up in the first place.

[statnerds]

Simmer down buddy. Act like a cocky punk ass kid and this is the response you get when you're wrong. Learn to live with it or shut the fukk up in the first place.

I'm fine with cool guys going to extremes when I post losers, as long as those same folks are man enough to give props on threads going a combined 27-18.

[dwaechte]

I'm fine with cool guys going to extremes when I post losers, as long as those same folks are man enough to give props on threads going a combined 27-18.

You just don't get it.

[TheLock]

The LOL part of this thread is the small sample size statnerds is getting hammered about. So no one else has ever run bad?

[statnerds]

The LOL part of this thread is the small sample size statnerds is getting hammered about. So no one else has ever run bad?

Which is made even more humorous by the fact that the sample size excludes the aforementioned 27-18.

Kind of easy to catch on to the game the haters play on here. 8-4 yesterday, and didn't even reach 100 views. I can just imagine how pissed people were when I won cause they had to wait like 8 hours and then couldn't go back in and say one fukkin word...

[G's pks]

where are the 8-4 picks posted before the scores or games ended put a link here thanks!

[G's pks]

11/28/2010 @ 09:00 pm nfl[9238] colts "live" +8.5-110lost

0-1

[G's pks]

Football NFL Live Bet
Wager Type:Straight Bet
Colts LIVE
Spread +15½ -110 for Game

lost

0-2 that is what is posted here...

[G's pks]

Don't run him off! He is money in the bank if you fade him!

Every play he posts loses and every play plus more that he never posts wins wow....