Will books ever offer this?

[rm18]

I was thinking that antiparlays would be a good idea for books.

Say you let the better risk 320/100 that he can pick one of two games right, or 750/100 that he can hit 1/3.

What do you guys think? Or does someone already offer this?

Of course you can already do this artificially with 3 parlays but that is too much juice for the bettor

[bigboydan]

i don't know any books offer reverse parlays offhand, or even if they might accept them RM.

[rm18]

Brock Landers made me think of this thread, I bet over half the forum wishes they had a way to bet he will not hit all three of his games today.

Yes you could take all the dogs on the ML but if the first two lose and SF wins then you break even only.

If a parlay of 3 game pays +150 or so you should be able to lay -175 that it does not win I think someone should offer it.

But like I said before I think the most appealing offering would be giving bettors the chance to lay -320 that they can go 1-1 or better