Since some books round down, would it be unfair to exploit

[ProfaneReality]

software that rounds up ?

I know of a software, and Im sure many are aware that if you risk $5 the to win is $5 even on a -110 line

so if you bet $100 a game just pop it 20 times and you have a juice free bet

although im sure the book would come along and correct it very shortly.

[buztah]

Why do you phux always pull this shit and then cry when your phucken azz gets banned? I hope the book you try this with keeps your deposit and leaves your fickle kunt self in the wind to twist. Phuck you!

[prop]

^ A little harsh IMO
If they want to ban him fine, he played by rules though so pay the fk up and then give a ban.

[buztah]

^ A little harsh IMO
If they want to ban him fine, he played by rules though so pay the fk up and then give a ban.

Bullphuckenshit, pal! So if the POS motherphucker can't make a living by placing shrewd bets he should try to rip off a book? Unreal.

[ProfaneReality]

hey cunt, Ive never done it, I posed a hypothetical, now take your bruised little vagina elsewhere

[buztah]

hey cunt, Ive never done it, I posed a hypothetical, now take your bruised little vagina elsewhere

You should be banned from every book and from participating on any point wagers here.

Not to be trusted.

[BigDaddy]

used to be able to do that at BOS

you could bet a -200 fav for 1 to win 1 and just bet the shit out of it

how did that turn out for us?

[buztah]

BD, these maggots cannot learn. Unphuckenreal!

[MadTiger]

To answer your question, yes, it would be unfair (unethical, immoral based on some religions, etc.).

[rm18]

yeh I used to do this at Bet on sports, you could not bet 1/1 but could bet like 16/15 at -110 i think