UCLA only -1700 ML ???

ryanjep · 10-01-10, 06:55 PM

have you ever heard of a let down game? awful big win last week for the bruins

Dank_Fire · 10-01-10, 06:56 PM

Watch out Wazzu always plays UCLA tough...let down spot for the Bruins imo...im already on Wash St+25

jeffksu · 10-01-10, 07:57 PM

hell ya get on em big big.. ml -1700 no plroblem....get a clue...

tltaylor89 · 10-01-10, 08:04 PM

UCLA -24 IS a $25000 play for me

DrStale · 10-01-10, 08:59 PM

Yeah they'll probably win, but clearly you didn't watch their game against Stanford, this team certainly has the ability to be terrible.

hhsilver · 10-01-10, 11:45 PM

big let down after texas - and i think a big bounce back for texas this week -- too many losing bets come from too much emphasis on the most recent game.

ZetaPsi808 · 10-02-10, 12:43 AM

nobs you are too greatly influenced by UCLA's strong upset win last week. many teams play great as dogs but horrible as favorites. the cubs in mlb are a great example of that.

hanco21 · 10-02-10, 12:46 AM

Thats the ticket, I think I will lay 5k to win $300.........NOT

Marigold HD · 10-02-10, 12:55 AM

Hold on.....I'm on my way to ** to deposit $17,000.....I need to win $1000 and fast....lol

iQon · 10-02-10, 01:03 AM

Only..... -1700

THE PROFIT · 10-02-10, 01:05 AM

this is the kind of thinking that will make you rich & successful

acarmelo1 · 10-02-10, 01:13 AM

Take UCLA +24 -999999999 it is better

spongerat · 10-02-10, 01:45 AM

UCLA also has Cal next week, so its a sandwich spot for them

nobs · 10-02-10, 06:51 PM

Originally posted by jeffksu

hell ya get on em big big.. ml -1700 no plroblem....get a clue...

Yeah I have posted 40-50 of these plays since college football started, and EVERY ONE of them has won. You keep betting your 50% ATS plays and keep claiming that youre hitting 60%, whatever makes you happy.

These are the best +EV plays on the board, some people are just too stupid to see it.

nobs · 10-02-10, 06:53 PM

oh no ml is -1700 im scared im scared to lay -1700. who cares that there is no way in hell that UCLA is going lose.

Dont worry I understand Jeff. You have about $200 to your name and you dont want to bet $200 to win $12. No you would rather risk it all on some 50% ATS play. And you wonder why youre broke

nobs · 10-02-10, 06:54 PM

Originally posted by ZetaPsi808

nobs you are too greatly influenced by UCLA's strong upset win last week. many teams play great as dogs but horrible as favorites. the cubs in mlb are a great example of that.

No I wasnt going by UCLA being great, I was going by the fact that Wash State is pathetic.

Now I know, they did beat Montana State by 1 point, hope they enjoyed what will definitly by their only win of the year

nobs · 10-02-10, 06:56 PM

Originally posted by hanco21

Thats the ticket, I think I will lay 5k to win $300.........NOT

Dude you dont even have enough $$$ to Become a Pro, and you are dreaming about betting 5K. You must have meant 5K pesos

nobs · 10-02-10, 07:00 PM

Originally posted by iQon

Only..... -1700

yeah "only -1700".

Its not too hard to see why so many people on this board dont even have the money to become pros.

Fools are too dumb to play an obvious +EV line. They see the -1700 and get scared.

HMM, me vs. Tiger woods for 4 rounds. What would the line be ?

If its Tiger -1700, yeah that would be " ONLY -1700 "

Anyone who automatically dismisses a line because its -1700 is a fool, and broke.

+ EV plays can be found, even at -1700.

I have posted 40-50 big ML favorites and havent lost yet, hope your ATS coin flips worked out for you today.

DrStale · 10-02-10, 09:19 PM

Did you see the game? -1700 clearly wasn't good value. UCLA was losing this game deep into the 3rd quarter and you're being cocky about laying -1700 on this play?

Andy117 · 10-02-10, 10:30 PM

Originally posted by nobs

yeah "only -1700".

Its not too hard to see why so many people on this board dont even have the money to become pros.

Fools are too dumb to play an obvious +EV line. They see the -1700 and get scared.

HMM, me vs. Tiger woods for 4 rounds. What would the line be ?

If its Tiger -1700, yeah that would be " ONLY -1700 "

Anyone who automatically dismisses a line because its -1700 is a fool, and broke.

+ EV plays can be found, even at -1700.

I have posted 40-50 big ML favorites and havent lost yet, hope your ATS coin flips worked out for you today.

Ouch!

BigMattM · 10-02-10, 10:32 PM

Great call!

BigMattM · 10-02-10, 10:33 PM

I loe me some -1700!

OmgUrMom · 10-02-10, 10:44 PM

I have posted 40-50 big ML favorites and havent lost yet, hope your ATS coin flips worked out for you today.

OmgUrMom · 10-02-10, 10:45 PM

I have posted 40-50 big ML favorites and havent lost yet, hope your ATS coin flips worked out for you today

RollPlayer · 10-03-10, 12:17 AM

It may be +EV, but one loss will kill a bankroll. Be careful...

nobs · 10-05-10, 07:20 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

Did you see the game? -1700 clearly wasn't good value. UCLA was losing this game deep into the 3rd quarter and you're being cocky about laying -1700 on this play?

No I didnt see the game or any scores, whatever the hell the score was in the 3rd quarter doesnt mean jack shit. I have been ahead in the 3rd quarter so many damn times, yet thebook refuses to pay me just because my team "WAS" ahead in the 3rd quarter.

Why the fuk would I watch UCLA vs Wa State ? You got nothing better to do on Saturday than watch a shit game like that.

Dude, I have posted over 40 big ML favorites this season and EVERY one of the has won. The haters are all in my threads being cocky BEFORE the games, funny I am the only one who is cocky AFTER the game.

Now move on, you are definitely dr. STALE