I always thought it was in bad taste when exclusively baseball teams advertise Viagra in the behind home plate electronic advertising board.It's got to be embarrassing for people that take their 6-9 year old kids that ask questions as to what everything is. It's like pro baseball that already gets tax payer subsidies for stadiums has to squeeze that last tid bit of tooth paste out of the advertising tube to steep so low as to make money selling Viagra ads.
I'm the first person to say that it should be free market everything but nothing these days is free market and you would think that people would be at least telling the teams and Viagra that it's in bad taste to advertise at games like that.
Why not have abortion doctors place ads behind home plate too.Someone has to pay for Roger Clemens making 17 million dollars pitching in a few games starting after July 4th.
WRONG SUBFORUM,HEHE,I THOUGHT I WAS ON PLAYERS TALK.
I'm the first person to say that it should be free market everything but nothing these days is free market and you would think that people would be at least telling the teams and Viagra that it's in bad taste to advertise at games like that.
Why not have abortion doctors place ads behind home plate too.Someone has to pay for Roger Clemens making 17 million dollars pitching in a few games starting after July 4th.
WRONG SUBFORUM,HEHE,I THOUGHT I WAS ON PLAYERS TALK.