Just out of curiousity SBR

**raiders72001** · 01-30-06, 11:35 PM

Buddy- The funniest ones were when SBR would intentional misspell the books name and URL if they didn't pay SBR. Even if you brought it to SBR's attention they wouldn't change it.

**pags11** · 01-31-06, 05:07 AM

never had noticed this until now...

**Bill Dozer** · 01-31-06, 10:58 AM

Originally posted by BuddyBear

I don't want to sound like a consirpacy theorist...and I do value SBR's ratings and leadership quite a bit...but why is it some A- books are in bold while other A- books are not in bold in your sportsbookreview.com section.

I know this only fuels debate on whether you guys accept advertising dollars or play favorites and such but I am really wondering.

Thanks

The bolded represent the Recommended List. It is possible for a book to be rated A- and not quite make the list or be too close to a sister book in offerings. Some Euro-bookies are highly rated but are not included in the Rec list.

**SBR_John** · 02-01-06, 01:08 AM

We didnt misspell raiders, we abbreviated and dont forget we didnt give them a link either. They were on the list for free so any exposure, even abbreviated names, were quite a good bargain. Ah the good ole days....

**raiders72001** · 02-01-06, 03:44 AM

I wish you had a forum back in the good ole days. There was more material to get on you back then.

**chester** · 02-01-06, 03:47 AM

what forum?

**raiders72001** · 02-01-06, 03:56 AM

I'm talking about the SBR forum. It hasn't been open that long and John has really cleaned up his act recently.

**SBR_John** · 02-01-06, 03:57 AM

I don’t know Raiders... I often see you creatively embellishing your hits on SBR like there is not enough of a story if told straight. Rob and russ spend hours plotting some silly forumville embellished SBR rumor. Its all good and I enjoy it... you know you have done something good when your critics have to actually make up or embellish their criticism.

**raiders72001** · 02-01-06, 04:00 AM