Thoughts until Week 2...

minet123 · 09-14-10, 01:13 AM

Foldy brilliant
now stay away from 5 team chalk baseball parlays

iifold · 09-14-10, 01:19 AM

If you watched the Raiders this week, you probably think they can't rush the passer...

They were just trying to contain the dual running threat of Johnson/Young...

You are probably thinking this "lack" of pass rush will help the Rookie Sam Bradford and the Rams cover this week in Oakland...

You couldn't be more wrong..

Think this line opened at 4 and is already at 4.5...

Bradford will be on his back all day and the Raiders will get a very very very rare double digit victory..

Campbell will look "great", going something like 15-21 on mostly screens and check downs..

iifold · 09-14-10, 01:32 AM

I haven't checked the weather report, and don't think a line is out yet, but I'm 87.4% sure the Ravens and Bengals put up 50 plus points this Week...

Perfect fukkin storm here..

Jets garbage offense made Ravens defense look better than it is..

Patriots were so busy scoring the Bengals will have to wait till this week..

Ravens can and will put up points with anyone in the league if Flacco gets time..

Yeah, this Over is a lock..

Quote me..

iifold · 09-14-10, 01:47 AM

Wake Forest has score over 100 points so far this year..

Yeah, I know they have played teams BigEric could probably play D-Line for, but 100 points is 100 points..

Stanford is a solid football team, very solid..

But the only big play potential they have is off play action, they can't just run by people straight up..

Your gonna give me 17 points??

Wake Forest +17

Prick, you stumblin, bumblin, drunk fukk.. You better not take this one...

iifold · 09-14-10, 01:58 AM

The Only 2 things that can slow down the Saints are Bad Weather or a good Running Game...

The Bay Area is having an Indian Summer and Frank Gore has lost a step..

Saints -5

Sprinkle the Over 44

tblues2005 · 09-14-10, 02:36 AM

I like your picks so far and I think you got some solid plays here.

Pauulzcappin · 09-14-10, 02:37 AM

Saints are a lock, I'm unloading on them hard.

Seven4os · 09-14-10, 03:57 AM

Go Saints!

Robust · 09-14-10, 04:33 AM

good points iifold..

will be on most of them with ya!

Robust

HauntingTheHoly · 09-14-10, 04:59 AM

Originally posted by iifold

I haven't checked the weather report, and don't think a line is out yet, but I'm 87.4% sure the Ravens and Bengals put up 50 plus points this Week...

Perfect fukkin storm here..

Jets garbage offense made Ravens defense look better than it is..

Patriots were so busy scoring the Bengals will have to wait till this week..

Ravens can and will put up points with anyone in the league if Flacco gets time..

Yeah, this Over is a lock..

Quote me..

Did you check to see how they scored against each other last year?

HauntingTheHoly · 09-14-10, 05:01 AM

People assume the Niner's are garbage b/c they played like garbage week 1. They made just a few crucial mistakes, without those, they could be alright. And homefield on a Monday night with the spotlight on you multiplies the advantage of playing at home by 1.27. Yes, I did the math.

k13 · 09-14-10, 05:10 AM

How much should the Eagles be? It was -3. -3.5 is a fair line.

You can get Saints -4 if you like them that much.

Agree about the Raiders, they win. Last week means nothing except to fools to be using it for week 2.

I saw Jets -1 vs NE before MNF, I'm sure that will change. lol

HauntingTheHoly · 09-15-10, 01:36 PM

Shaun Hill is gonna be awesome and has some of the best intangibiles in the game?

I didn't realize. Why didn't they just start him, then? Surely they've lost something now with the starter going out. I don't see why the EAgles wouldn't tax that ass except that it is on Detroit on turff, right?

dollarbill · 09-15-10, 05:23 PM

One play a week

1-0 posted Green Bay Week one

Atlanta is a superior team to Arizona and add back-to-back road trips for Arizona

Atlanta 34-13

k13 · 09-15-10, 06:49 PM

Originally posted by iifold

Were you wondering why the Eagles are only -3.5??

He is why...

-5.5 now and going up

iifold · 09-15-10, 07:19 PM

Originally posted by k13

-5.5 now and going up

This just proves how fukkin sharp my original post was you clueless fukk..

Every know-nothing in town is putting their life savings on the Eagles because the think Shaun Hill is garbage..

It's guys like you that allow DSI to give away 12K a week..,

We thank you...

k13 · 09-15-10, 07:57 PM

Originally posted by iifold

This just proves how fukkin sharp my original post was you clueless fukk..

Every know-nothing in town is putting their life savings on the Eagles because the think Shaun Hill is garbage..

It's guys like you that allow DSI to give away 12K a week..,

We thank you...

Shaun Hill is garbage, watched enough in San Fran.

Not saying Lions can't cover.

Check my records in all the nfl contests and posted plays.

Saluki09 · 09-15-10, 09:15 PM

This cat obviously didnt see his boy shaun hill sunday. Looked like a typical backup qb for the Lions....Have fun betting on the Lions.

Rig · 09-15-10, 10:02 PM

Pros for the nice write ups

DaProfessor23 · 09-15-10, 10:13 PM

i like the write ups , good stuff

Brock Landers · 09-15-10, 10:18 PM

Chicago +9 King...take my advice your royal highness

Juwon · 09-16-10, 07:55 PM

I need some rookie advice here.

I hopped on the Eagles -4 on Tuesday because like everyone else, I saw Detroit Lions without Stafford and jumped all over Eagles -4. Threw $25 down.

Today, I'm realizing that this isn't as safe a bet as I thought, and want to negate it and just take a $3 loss and bet Lions on Sunday for $25 so that I break even minus the $3 rake, and call it a rookie mistake.

Is this an okay thing to do? This line just reads of fishiness, and far too many people are depending on a quarterback who hasn't played a meaningful down in how many years? He came in with no pressure trailing by double digits, and Shaun Hill has a career mid 80's qb rating. He's not as bad like fold says.

Is it an okay play to negate my bet and just take a $3 hit, then bet on something I'm more comfortable with?