Tennis Dispute

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Regul8er
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 11-06-07
    • 10666

    #1
    Tennis Dispute
    Hey guys. I played this bet at rebatewager, and I'm having trouble understanding.

    I picked Dodig at +155 over F. Gonzalez.
    Gonzo won the 1st set 7-6, Dodig won the 2nd set 6-1, and Dodig was up 1-0 in the 3rd set when Gonzo retired. Now below is the rule listed above the wagering list.

    ATP TENNIS MATCHUPS - Aug 30
    MEN`S TENNIS - US OPEN - (ROUND OF 128)
    MONDAY, AUGUST 30TH
    @ FLUSHING MEADOWS, QUEENS , NEW YORK , NY
    TWO FULL SETS MUST BE PLAYED FOR ACTION
    MEN`S TENNIS - US OPEN - (ROUND OF 128)

    This is what was explained to me:

    for wagering purposes we only take the first 2 sets that were completed, 3rd set was not...That means it ended
    being a push. D odig was claimed the winner for next round,that is correct...but that's for the tournament. As far as wagering the 3rd set was not completed so we take the score based on the finished sets


    ANY INPUT, I FEEL IVE BEEN SCREWED!!!




Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...